Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-01-2011, 12:32 PM
 
Location: 78747
3,202 posts, read 6,020,875 times
Reputation: 915

Advertisements

Your thoughts and feelings about this incident?

Authorities make changes after first responders watch man drown - CNN.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-01-2011, 01:12 PM
 
1,650 posts, read 3,519,543 times
Reputation: 1142
Well the police and fire folks are only interested in 6 figure salaries and pensions! They dont care about doing their jobs!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2011, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Just appauling. They should all be FIRED immediately.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2011, 01:40 PM
 
Location: South Korea
5,242 posts, read 13,080,225 times
Reputation: 2958
Constant budget cuts will lead to stuff like this where taxpayers expect services they don't want to pay for. But it's dumb to give the Coast Guard responsibility for water rescues and they aren't even able to do a water rescue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2011, 01:57 PM
 
26 posts, read 57,612 times
Reputation: 38
After reading the article, while it is terrible that this man drowned, I can see why the police and firemen were afraid to take action. First, the article says the guy in the water was suicidal. Second, none of the police and firemen were trained to do water rescues, so unless they were confident swimmers or previously lifeguards, they were probably afraid of drowning themselves while trying to drag a struggling man to shore. Third, the policies in place that wouldn't allow them to go in the water: if they violated the policies they would be in danger of losing their jobs, which is a very scary thing in this economy. I'm sure most of them have families and dependents that rely on their income.

What would you do in that situation? Really think about it. You could lose your family's livelihood and your own life trying to rescue a man that does not want to be rescued in an environment you are not used to. I also doubt the fire department keeps any kind of life rafts or floating devices with them. It sucks, but we're all human, even firefighters and policemen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2011, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Northern California
3,722 posts, read 14,725,748 times
Reputation: 1962
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Just appauling. They should all be FIRED immediately.
Just "appalling"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2011, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by humboldtrat View Post
just "appalling"
lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2011, 02:38 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,663,382 times
Reputation: 13635
Yeah, I mean why would they need to know water rescue procedures when the city is on an ISLAND!

Pretty ridiculous not a single officer or firefighter jumped in the water. Couldn't they have gone to the closest Big 5 and gotten a damn raft, kayak, boogie board, or something? I just don't get how any agency in charge of public safety located along the BAY doesn't have some sort of water rescue policies or skills on hand. I can understand Lafayette or Concord, but ALAMEDA??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2011, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
So they just stood there and watched the guy die.

Dont they swear an oath or something?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2011, 02:50 PM
 
Location: San Diego, California Republic
16,588 posts, read 27,394,395 times
Reputation: 9059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliooop View Post
After reading the article, while it is terrible that this man drowned, I can see why the police and firemen were afraid to take action. First, the article says the guy in the water was suicidal. Second, none of the police and firemen were trained to do water rescues, so unless they were confident swimmers or previously lifeguards, they were probably afraid of drowning themselves while trying to drag a struggling man to shore. Third, the policies in place that wouldn't allow them to go in the water: if they violated the policies they would be in danger of losing their jobs, which is a very scary thing in this economy. I'm sure most of them have families and dependents that rely on their income.

What would you do in that situation? Really think about it. You could lose your family's livelihood and your own life trying to rescue a man that does not want to be rescued in an environment you are not used to. I also doubt the fire department keeps any kind of life rafts or floating devices with them. It sucks, but we're all human, even firefighters and policemen.
It's possible to attempt a water rescue without actually entering the water, or at least as far out as the guy was. One could throw a rope to the guy for him to grab on and he could be pulled to shore that way. A long pole would do as well but a rope works better as you would throw it passed them and as you pull it they grab on. They watched for an hour so they had time. I find it interesting that this fire department doesn't know of that technique as it was taught to me by a firefighter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top