Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education > Teaching
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-07-2017, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Eugene, Oregon
11,122 posts, read 5,590,841 times
Reputation: 16596

Advertisements

The worst thing you can do to a student, is tell them they are gifted and are entitled to special status. Truly gifted students will take charge of their own education and will have learned more pre-school, than many will during school. Take a close look at the life-outcomes of those who are put in honor classes. Their performance in the real world, is mediocre.

From my supposedly "high-achieving" high school class, three of them graduated four years later from our university, with three of the places in the "Senior-Six", the highest level of 130, who made Phi Beta Kappa. Ten years later, one of them was an attendant at a day-care center, working with 3-year olds. Another was the divorced wife of a very wealthy guy, who she later found was a homosexual. She had no job. The other completely vanished and no one in town had any idea what had happened to her. There was another honor-roll member from our high school, who was class president and voted "Most Likely to Succeed". At age 35, he was working as the janitor at a chain of banks.

When I met and talked to this guy, I was with a new woman-friend. He had been describing how much he liked working as a janitor. Later, I pulled out my high school annual and showed her his pictures and the honors I described. She was speechless. The lesson is, that if you try to manufacture honors students our of those who just don't have the chops for it, the end result won't be good. The really good ones don't need your help and they don't have a need for recognition by others-------they just learn a lot and perform well. Far too much fuss is made over the appointed scholars, whose progress is stifled by the unearned status that is handed to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-07-2017, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,822 posts, read 24,335,838 times
Reputation: 32953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
The worst thing you can do to a student, is tell them they are gifted and are entitled to special status. Truly gifted students will take charge of their own education and will have learned more pre-school, than many will during school. Take a close look at the life-outcomes of those who are put in honor classes. Their performance in the real world, is mediocre.

...
Agreed. And parents do this all the time.

Not so sure I agree with that at all. Some will, but others will choose to be as typical a kid as they can be.

Other than anecdotally (and anecdotes are fine), do you have any support for that in the literature?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2017, 06:31 PM
 
3,281 posts, read 6,278,924 times
Reputation: 2416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
The worst thing you can do to a student, is tell them they are gifted and are entitled to special status. Truly gifted students will take charge of their own education and will have learned more pre-school, than many will during school. Take a close look at the life-outcomes of those who are put in honor classes. Their performance in the real world, is mediocre.

From my supposedly "high-achieving" high school class, three of them graduated four years later from our university, with three of the places in the "Senior-Six", the highest level of 130, who made Phi Beta Kappa. Ten years later, one of them was an attendant at a day-care center, working with 3-year olds. Another was the divorced wife of a very wealthy guy, who she later found was a homosexual. She had no job. The other completely vanished and no one in town had any idea what had happened to her. There was another honor-roll member from our high school, who was class president and voted "Most Likely to Succeed". At age 35, he was working as the janitor at a chain of banks.

When I met and talked to this guy, I was with a new woman-friend. He had been describing how much he liked working as a janitor. Later, I pulled out my high school annual and showed her his pictures and the honors I described. She was speechless. The lesson is, that if you try to manufacture honors students our of those who just don't have the chops for it, the end result won't be good. The really good ones don't need your help and they don't have a need for recognition by others-------they just learn a lot and perform well. Far too much fuss is made over the appointed scholars, whose progress is stifled by the unearned status that is handed to them.
Good honors and gifted programs are not about a label or special status. These programs should be about ensuring that kids that need appropriate challenges and differentiation from the regular curriculum are receiving it. Nothing more and nothing less. It's a typical misconception to argue that advanced students should be left to their own devices and they will be just fine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2017, 09:12 PM
 
12,847 posts, read 9,055,079 times
Reputation: 34940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
The worst thing you can do to a student, is .... Far too much fuss is made over the appointed scholars, whose progress is stifled by the unearned status that is handed to them.
I'm always amazed by the number of people, from kids in school, to adults that have to make some negative comment about gifted.




Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
Agreed. And parents do this all the time.

Not so sure I agree with that at all. Some will, but others will choose to be as typical a kid as they can be.

Other than anecdotally (and anecdotes are fine), do you have any support for that in the literature?
I do agree with your response here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2017, 09:23 PM
 
331 posts, read 369,895 times
Reputation: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
Good for you!

One of the reasons I hated having some teachers teach only honors was that I think over time they lost perspective about what "regular kids" were all about.
Agree! I have taught on-level Algebra 1 in various schools for the past 8 years, a few times getting to teach Honors courses. This year I have some of each, CP, Honors, and applied. I like each one for different reasons. Honors Geometry, I get to totally geek out (like today when we proved that the circumcenter of a triangle is equidistant from the vertices), and also teach valuable life skills (how to be organized and manage time wisely) to the CP and below kids. Those are sometimes more rewarding because the kids "need" you more. What's most shocking is having the top-of-the-class 9th graders AND some of the bottom-of-the-class in back to back periods.

I think it's a nice balance. I tend to agree that if you teach only honors for too long, you lose touch. We recently had a debate about technology and many teachers of the advanced students were in favor of 1:1 devices for them. Having 5 out of my 6 classes be freshman, I was totally against the idea - they need to learn the basic organizational and note-taking skills first before we can expect them to do so on a device responsibly. Only a few seemed to agree with me and we were the ones with the CP and below tracks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2017, 06:54 PM
 
Location: NJ
807 posts, read 1,033,531 times
Reputation: 2448
I like teaching honors. I appreciate that these kids want to learn, or at least try. And that they have a vision for their future, mostly.

I do not like teaching lower level classes. Mostly because their behavior is worst, they don't care, they don't study, and sometimes it makes me feel like I'm wasting my time. Teaching low level chemistry is like teaching middle school science, and I didn't sign up to be a middle school teacher. Also, lower level kids are way too much work. It's a struggle just to get them to bring a freakin pencil to class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2017, 10:12 PM
 
Location: New Mexico via Ohio via Indiana
1,796 posts, read 2,232,994 times
Reputation: 2940
There are those honors students, however, who are nasty, brutal, cutthroat, scheming, and love nothing better than to be a contrarian to everything the teacher says.
Yeah, I got one in my honors class.
Think Tracy Flick from the brilliant school movie "Election." Smart? Sure. Good home? Yep. But I truly smile when the Tracy Flick of my current crop of twelfth graders is not in my class because of a sports event or because she's sick. I'd rather deal with any low-level kid than her. And most of them are more respectful in the bargain.

Last edited by kpl1228; 02-12-2017 at 10:29 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2017, 08:19 PM
 
331 posts, read 369,895 times
Reputation: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by fred44 View Post
I like teaching honors. I appreciate that these kids want to learn, or at least try. And that they have a vision for their future, mostly.

I do not like teaching lower level classes. Mostly because their behavior is worst, they don't care, they don't study, and sometimes it makes me feel like I'm wasting my time. Teaching low level chemistry is like teaching middle school science, and I didn't sign up to be a middle school teacher. Also, lower level kids are way too much work. It's a struggle just to get them to bring a freakin pencil to class.
One thing that's nice, though, is that low- and average-level students are so totally fine with "just passing" - I've had kids be happy to get a 75 for the quarter.

Honors, on the other hand, fight for every last 1/2 point taken off on a test. It's especially worse in a small school when you have the only Honors section of that class - I taught Honors Geometry like this one year. 27 sophomores - 11 girls and 16 boys - last period of the day - the top 10 in the class in there. There were so many fights for the top it was unreal!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Middle America
37,409 posts, read 53,584,768 times
Reputation: 53073
Kids debating endlessly over why they got docked that half a point, etc. IS tiresome. They're also going to be the ones trying to contest their performance evaluations with their bosses.

Smart, motivated, critically thinking students are great.

Students who've been conditioned their whole lives that they "deserve" 100% in everything in life, and that they are above critique are tiresome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 10:37 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,396 posts, read 60,592,880 times
Reputation: 61012
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrknowitall526 View Post
One thing that's nice, though, is that low- and average-level students are so totally fine with "just passing" - I've had kids be happy to get a 75 for the quarter.

Honors, on the other hand, fight for every last 1/2 point taken off on a test. It's especially worse in a small school when you have the only Honors section of that class - I taught Honors Geometry like this one year. 27 sophomores - 11 girls and 16 boys - last period of the day - the top 10 in the class in there. There were so many fights for the top it was unreal!
Over the years I had a lot of kids who were happy with a 60%.

Had one kid one year who got back the first test and he had a 45. He got all excited and I figured "Oh crap, he's going to complain". Nope. He was excited because that was the highest grade he'd ever gotten on a History test.

I ended up pushing him through, repeating the class would have done nothing for him. Nice kid, very limited.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education > Teaching

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top