Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-17-2011, 06:59 PM
 
2,223 posts, read 5,486,212 times
Reputation: 2081

Advertisements

Someone told me that they actually had a defense system in Galveston, I think bunkers with guns on top, to fight off a possible German invasion? lol. Why attack Texas when there's a huge East coast much closer to them. Somebody must have felt a little too important. And those bunkers must have been there until well into the 60's, but without the guns. I looked it up and it really does seem like Fort Crockett was armed because they thought the U-boats were coming. Anyone old enough to remember? I thought it was funny - just typical Texan.

 
Old 08-17-2011, 08:28 PM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,212,862 times
Reputation: 4258
Texas really thought they were going to get attacked?

Yes

Fort Crockett
Quote:
In 1942 when the menace of German submarines entering the Gulf of Mexico became apparent, it was realized the open guns of Battery Hoskins were very vulnerable to both air and sea bombardment. It was decided that a concrete casemate (often referred to as a "bunker") be built over the gun emplacements to increase their protection and the Army Corps of Engineers began by casemating Battery Hoskins to withstand an attack of 5,000-pound naval shells.
Photos at the link. Or, google galveston bunkers
 
Old 08-17-2011, 08:35 PM
 
Location: Blah
4,153 posts, read 9,266,293 times
Reputation: 3092
Quote:
Originally Posted by GummyBearGang View Post
Someone told me that they actually had a defense system in Galveston, I think bunkers with guns on top, to fight off a possible German invasion? lol. Why attack Texas when there's a huge East coast much closer to them. Somebody must have felt a little too important. And those bunkers must have been there until well into the 60's, but without the guns. I looked it up and it really does seem like Fort Crockett was armed because they thought the U-boats were coming. Anyone old enough to remember? I thought it was funny - just typical Texan.
Two words, Zimmermann Telegram.
Zimmermann Telegram - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How about German U-Boats in the Gulf of Mexico during WWII

U-boats in the Gulf of Mexico

Now with that said, I bet you can tell me the who won the last American Idol contest uh? No wonder our country is ran by idiots!
 
Old 08-17-2011, 09:19 PM
 
2,223 posts, read 5,486,212 times
Reputation: 2081
Quote:
Originally Posted by tofurkey View Post
Texas really thought they were going to get attacked?

Yes

Fort Crockett
Photos at the link. Or, google galveston bunkers
Thanks, didn't know there were still some preserved remains left. I will visit it the next time I go.


Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTRay View Post
Two words, Zimmermann Telegram.
Zimmermann Telegram - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How about German U-Boats in the Gulf of Mexico during WWII

U-boats in the Gulf of Mexico

Now with that said, I bet you can tell me the who won the last American Idol contest uh? No wonder our country is ran by idiots!
Nope, I can't. I don't watch it. You don't know everything either. And this is nothing major.
Besides, those bunkers aren't exactly the best method to fight off U-boats, and the coast was way too far away from Europe to even consider an invasion.
Zimmermann was in 1917. And putting up some bunkers there had nothing to do with this.
I don't think our country is run by idiots.

Anyway, they only had those in Galveston? One Fort?
 
Old 08-17-2011, 09:38 PM
 
Location: A little suburb of Houston
3,702 posts, read 18,212,654 times
Reputation: 2092
Quote:
Originally Posted by GummyBearGang View Post
Anyway, they only had those in Galveston? One Fort?
Strategically placed to protect the entrance to Galveston Bay. Jacintoport and Greens Bayou were home to a large portion of the US production of bombs, ammo, and other armement during the war (many of the old earth-covered ammo bunkers are still in use as storage). Also the home of the oil refineries that produced fuel for all those ships. A Uboat could not make it through that area without surfacing, so the fort would have been effective if it had been needed. The original fort dates back to the 1800's.

The tourist part on Bolivar (Fort Travis portion) just very recently reopened after restoration for damage from Hurricane Ike.

Last edited by Poltracker; 08-17-2011 at 09:50 PM..
 
Old 08-17-2011, 10:15 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,630,016 times
Reputation: 8617
Strategically, there were other areas that were 'hardened', such as the magnesium cells at Dow Chemical, which were vital to U.S. aircraft production. The plant still resembles a bunker.
 
Old 08-17-2011, 11:26 PM
 
15,528 posts, read 10,496,731 times
Reputation: 15812
From Wiki:

Gulf of Mexico - Once convoys and air cover were introduced in the Atlantic, sinking numbers were reduced and the U-boats shifted to attack shipping in the Gulf of Mexico. During 1942 and 1943, more than 20 U-boats operated in the Gulf of Mexico. They attacked tankers transporting oil from ports in Texas and Louisiana, successfully sinking 56 vessels. By the end of 1943, the U-boat attacks diminished as the merchant ships began to travel in armed convoys.

In one instance, the tanker Virginia was torpedoed in the mouth of the Mississippi River by the German U-Boat U-507 on May 12, 1942, killing 26 crewmen. There were 14 survivors. Again, when defensive measures were introduced, ship sinkings decreased and U-boat sinkings increased.

U-166 was the only U-boat sunk in the Gulf of Mexico during the war. Once thought to have been sunk by a torpedo dropped from a U.S. Coast Guard Utility Amphibian J4F aircraft on August 1, 1942, U-166 is now believed to have been sunk two days earlier by depth charges from the Robert E. Lee’s naval escort, the U.S. Navy sub-chaser, PC-566. It is thought that the J4F aircraft may have spotted and attacked another German submarine, U-171, which was operating in the area at the same time. U-166 lies in 5,000 feet of water within a mile of her last victim, the passenger ship SS Robert E. Lee.
 
Old 08-18-2011, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
20,958 posts, read 45,395,703 times
Reputation: 24745
Quote:
Originally Posted by GummyBearGang View Post
Someone told me that they actually had a defense system in Galveston, I think bunkers with guns on top, to fight off a possible German invasion? lol. Why attack Texas when there's a huge East coast much closer to them. Somebody must have felt a little too important. And those bunkers must have been there until well into the 60's, but without the guns. I looked it up and it really does seem like Fort Crockett was armed because they thought the U-boats were coming. Anyone old enough to remember? I thought it was funny - just typical Texan.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GummyBearGang View Post
Thanks, didn't know there were still some preserved remains left. I will visit it the next time I go.




Nope, I can't. I don't watch it. You don't know everything either. And this is nothing major.
Besides, those bunkers aren't exactly the best method to fight off U-boats, and the coast was way too far away from Europe to even consider an invasion.
Zimmermann was in 1917. And putting up some bunkers there had nothing to do with this.
I don't think our country is run by idiots.

Anyway, they only had those in Galveston? One Fort?
So, this started out as a pretty transparent attempt to score points on Texas, and then when it became obvious that Texas wasn't the one with the problem and that the original poster did minimal, if any, research, to determine if there was an actual reason to protect the Texas coast from German attack (which there very clearly was), the OP turns to critiquing military strategy.
 
Old 08-18-2011, 09:55 AM
 
563 posts, read 910,191 times
Reputation: 674
Quote:
Originally Posted by GummyBearGang View Post
Someone told me that they actually had a defense system in Galveston, I think bunkers with guns on top, to fight off a possible German invasion? lol. Why attack Texas when there's a huge East coast much closer to them. Somebody must have felt a little too important. And those bunkers must have been there until well into the 60's, but without the guns. I looked it up and it really does seem like Fort Crockett was armed because they thought the U-boats were coming. Anyone old enough to remember? I thought it was funny - just typical Texan.
Maybe because the largest naval base in the United States is located in Norfolk, Virginia?

If you were German is that where YOU would plan your attack smart guy?

I think I would rather enter somewhere that had weaker defenses... just sayin'
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top