Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
[quote=jerseygal4u;29938029]Where did she say she promised him sex?
Maybe he paid her for conversation only,but wanted sex as part of the deal? /quote]
Another myth, that lonely men hire escorts just to "talk."
He should have done his research with the big head.
This is a common scam for dial-a-hookers, where they show up and take the money and run. The "driver" is ready to beat and maybe even kill the hapless chump if he resists, though his mere presence is usually enough. Dangerous work but as you can see, it can very lucrative for almost no work.
Sorry, no sympathy here. It was a business transaction, and the woman defaulted the "contract", which was, "sex for cash", if she wanted to terminate the contract, her obligation was to return the money. She was a thief.
She had a choice.
I wonder how often this woman had done the same scam, knowing most men would not report the theft for an illegal transaction. She scammed the wrong man this time.
Are you saying it is OK to shoot a person if they renege on a contract? The streets would be flowing with blood if this was the case.
Are you saying it is OK to shoot a person if they renege on a contract? The
streets would be flowing with blood if this was the case.
I find it appalling that anyone (I'm thinking of the jury) could remotely conceive of the notion that in a such a situation, you are entitled to kill someone.
Now, if I had been on the jury and he had given her a black eye, I probably would have trouble convicting him of assault in that situation. If he had simply used physical force to take the money back from her, I know I wouldn't have convicted him of anything.
No. I said,"she is a thief". Breaking a contract is fine. Taking the money, and leaving was the problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by markg91359
I find it appalling that anyone (I'm thinking of the jury) could remotely conceive of the notion that in a such a situation, you are entitled to kill someone.
Now, if I had been on the jury and he had given her a black eye, I probably would have trouble convicting him of assault in that situation. If he had simply used physical force to take the money back from her, I know I wouldn't have convicted him of anything.
Physical force and assault would be unwarranted.
Prostitution is still illegal. Sure he got scammed....suck it up.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
