Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > U.S. Territories
 [Register]
U.S. Territories Puerto Rico, Guam, U.S. Virgin Islands, etc.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should Puerto Rico become a state or an independent nation?
State 75 41.90%
Independent nation 84 46.93%
Other (please specify in your post) 20 11.17%
Voters: 179. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-08-2020, 01:44 PM
 
Location: On a Long Island in NY
7,800 posts, read 10,108,790 times
Reputation: 7366

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoPro View Post
What does race have to do with it?
Puerto Rico is a victim of US imperialism.
So was Texas ... should we give it back to Mexico?

 
Old 02-15-2020, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
12,950 posts, read 13,346,261 times
Reputation: 14010
Nope, Texas fought for its independence from a tyrannical Mexican government and earned it in blood.

Now in the case of the “Mexican Cession of 1848” (New Mexico, Arizona, California, Nevada) you would be correct. They can have it back.
 
Old 02-15-2020, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Florida
14,968 posts, read 9,814,811 times
Reputation: 12084
Quote:
Originally Posted by WIHS2006 View Post
Roughly 90% of the population opposes independence.

Should we get rid of Alabama and West Virginia too? Or are they special because White Republicans live there?
You don't acknowledge the obvious difference? It's not about race.... so why even go there?
 
Old 02-15-2020, 03:29 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,169 posts, read 8,021,713 times
Reputation: 10139
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave_n_Tenn View Post
You don't acknowledge the obvious difference? It's not about race.... so why even go there?
Ehh Puerto Rico being 99% Non White probably doesnt help its case for statehood. There definitely is some WHite Republican Bias there.
 
Old 02-15-2020, 04:20 PM
 
Location: Florida
14,968 posts, read 9,814,811 times
Reputation: 12084
Quote:
Originally Posted by masssachoicetts View Post
Ehh Puerto Rico being 99% Non White probably doesnt help its case for statehood. There definitely is some WHite Republican Bias there.
Bias for what? If PR wanted to be a state... they just have to vote yes. The ballot is blind to race. Who would prevent it? They're already Americans.

It wouldn't be financially beneficial for PR .
 
Old 02-18-2020, 09:00 AM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,639 posts, read 18,235,725 times
Reputation: 34515
Quote:
Originally Posted by masssachoicetts View Post
Ehh Puerto Rico being 99% Non White probably doesnt help its case for statehood. There definitely is some WHite Republican Bias there.
Firstly, Puerto Ricans are predominantly white; white Hispanics if you will, though a fair amount are other races and of mixed race. That said, PRs most serious challenge to statehood is that it would likely upset the political balance in Washington as any PR state would be likely to send Democrats to Congress vice Republicans,
 
Old 02-18-2020, 04:02 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,827,146 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
That said, PRs most serious challenge to statehood is that it would likely upset the political balance in Washington as any PR state would be likely to send Democrats to Congress vice Republicans,
That's exactly why the GOP is opposed to PR gaining statehood. Mitch McConnell said that as long as he controls the Senate, statehood will never happen.

I think it's ridiculous to deny statehood based on political affiliation.
 
Old 02-19-2020, 05:28 AM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,639 posts, read 18,235,725 times
Reputation: 34515
Quote:
Originally Posted by LM117 View Post
That's exactly why the GOP is opposed to PR gaining statehood. Mitch McConnell said that as long as he controls the Senate, statehood will never happen.

I think it's ridiculous to deny statehood based on political affiliation.
While reasonable minds can disagree on that, do know that this is not unique to Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party. Texas can legally split into five separate states under the terms of its admission to the Union. You know there is no way in hell that Democrats would allow for such a split as it would upset the balance of power.

I'm on the side where I think politics does matter, especially once we start talking about a change in political power alignment that could threaten issues you care deeply about.
 
Old 02-19-2020, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Somewhere below Mason/Dixon
9,471 posts, read 10,808,176 times
Reputation: 15980
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
While reasonable minds can disagree on that, do know that this is not unique to Mitch McConnell or the Republican Party. Texas can legally split into five separate states under the terms of its admission to the Union. You know there is no way in hell that Democrats would allow for such a split as it would upset the balance of power.

I'm on the side where I think politics does matter, especially once we start talking about a change in political power alignment that could threaten issues you care deeply about.
We used to admit two states together to preserve the balance of power in a very divided era. We are that divided again. The problem is that the previous time period that we did that to preserve the balance of power was the era leading up to the civil war. The fact that we don’t want to admit PR because of the politics of it should scare everyone as it says something not so good about the state of this country.
 
Old 02-19-2020, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,639 posts, read 18,235,725 times
Reputation: 34515
Quote:
Originally Posted by danielj72 View Post
We used to admit two states together to preserve the balance of power in a very divided era. We are that divided again. The problem is that the previous time period that we did that to preserve the balance of power was the era leading up to the civil war. The fact that we don’t want to admit PR because of the politics of it should scare everyone as it says something not so good about the state of this country.
I think that's a fair way of looking at things. But I argue that we've been politically divided (and very much so) for most of our country's history. And we've been admitting states in pairs/groups (within a year of each other) for the bulk of this country's history. And this goes beyond the Civil War. Heck, the most two recently admitted states (Alaska and Hawaii) were admitted at the same time in large part to preserve the political balance, and this was in 1959. Fun fact is that the original thought process was that Alaska would be a Dem state while Hawaii would be a Republican state. Of course, the opposite has occurred, though Democrats initially did govern Alaska and Republicans did initially govern Hawaii.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > U.S. Territories
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top