Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Did the 2nd NY claim provide a state benefit of 26 weeks, as well?
Call NY back and ask about unexhausted EUC on your first two claims.
You clearly began EUC on the 2011 claim, but at 6/2012 there should have been remaining at least another 28 weeks to collect.
05 wks Tier 1
14 wks Tier 2
09 wks Tier 3
Without knowing the length of your 2nd claim, it is hard to estimate how much EUC from that first claim remains, since that it what you were drawing on 2012-2013.
Also, did the 2nd claim qualify for EUC. Many do.
It is possible your EUC from the first claim was exhausted and the 2nd claim did not qualify. But, you need to find out.
For my first claim I stopped claiming my weeks during the months that I had started working (Feb-Apr) and then again until it ended. So I should have at least 10 weeks until the counting just 52 weeks in a year and since it's a max of 63 weeks for that claim I should have 23 weeks remaining.
When I filed for my 2nd claim I was told that whatever was remaining would be lost so I never asked them about it again. And I did qualify for EUC I had already started getting the first tier but since I found a job I stopped claiming it.
That's not helpful in arriving at your exact EUC balance. We need to know the exact number of weeks NY benefits you received on the 2nd claim.
Actually, it is 28. At the time you began claiming EUC, Tier 1 was paying 20 weeks. So, you received your first 52 weeks, as follows:
01 - NY waiting week
26 - NY state benefits
10 - worked
15 - EUC Tier 1
Leaving
05 EUC Tier 1 (20-15)
14 EUC Tier 2
09 EUC Tier 3
28 EUC wks remaining
Nothing is lost. Whoever told you that is WRONG. If you began EUC on Claim 1, whatever remains should have been paid after you exhausted your 2nd claim state benefits. Then, NY should have begun paying EUC from the 2nd claim, if that claim qualified.
There were issues a year or so ago when some states would not pay current claim EUC if claimant was still collecting 1st claim EUC at the 2nd claim bye, but NJ has since reversed that and is now paying EUC from both claims, even if claimant goes past the 2nd claim bye collecting 1st claim EUC.
Also, DOL EUC regs define "exhaustee" very liberally. If there is any EUC remaining on the 1st claim, you are entitled to it.
If NY paid 2nd claim EUC before exhausting 1st claim EUC, it was in contravention of DOL guidelines on administration of EUC.
Call NY about your unexhausted benefits.
If you continue to have problems, contact USDOL for your region:
That's not helpful in arriving at your exact EUC balance. We need to know the exact number of weeks NY benefits you received on the 2nd claim.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ginakc
For my first claim I stopped claiming my weeks during the months that I had started working (Feb-Apr) and then again until it ended. So I should have at least 10 weeks until the counting just 52 weeks in a year and since it's a max of 63 weeks for that claim I should have 23 weeks remaining.
Actually, it is 28. At the time you began claiming EUC, Tier 1 was paying 20 weeks. So, you received your first 52 weeks, as follows:
01 - NY waiting week
26 - NY state benefits
10 - worked
15 - EUC Tier 1
Leaving
05 EUC Tier 1 (20-15)
14 EUC Tier 2
09 EUC Tier 3
28 EUC wks remaining
Quote:
Originally Posted by ginakc
When I filed for my 2nd claim I was told that whatever was remaining would be lost so I never asked them about it again. And I did qualify for EUC I had already started getting the second tier but since I found a job I stopped claiming it.
Nothing is lost. Whoever told you that is WRONG. If you began EUC on Claim 1, whatever remains should have been paid after you exhausted your 2nd claim state benefits. Then, NY should have begun paying EUC from the 2nd claim, if that claim qualified.
There were issues a year or so ago when some states would not pay current claim EUC if claimant was still collecting 1st claim EUC at the 2nd claim bye, but NJ has since reversed that and is now paying EUC from both claims, even if claimant goes past the 2nd claim bye collecting 1st claim EUC.
Also, DOL EUC regs define "exhaustee" very liberally. If there is any EUC remaining on the 1st claim, you are entitled to it, as well as unexhausted EUC from your 2nd claim, if any.
If NY paid 2nd claim EUC before exhausting 1st claim EUC, it was in contravention of DOL guidelines on administration of EUC.
Call NY about your unexhausted benefits.
If you continue to have problems, contact USDOL for your region:
Question, I am collecting in Ma for few months( regular ui) then I got a temp job in New York, came back to MA and started collecting again until my benefit year ended on November, I qualified for tier 1 but UI called me that I don't qualified for an extension in MA anymore since I worked 4 months in NY, and that I need to file a new claim in NY, but I file in NY iit could be denied or maybe can collect half what I'm collecting now, I only made 10000 for the 4 months in NY, can I refuse NY benefits and have the tier1 in MA??
Question, I am collecting in Ma for few months( regular ui) then I got a temp job in New York, came back to MA and started collecting again until my benefit year ended on November, I qualified for tier 1 but UI called me that I don't qualified for an extension in MA anymore since I worked 4 months in NY, and that I need to file a new claim in NY, but I file in NY iit could be denied or maybe can collect half what I'm collecting now, I only made 10000 for the 4 months in NY, can I refuse NY benefits and have the tier1 in MA??
Federal EUC regulations prevent payment of EUC benefits if you have eligibility for new state benefits, except if the new claim can be deferred under HR4213. You are fortunate MA caught these earnings, which many states overlook, resulting in an overpayment assessment to you at later time.
Did you collect ANY EUC tier benefit on that MA claim? Or, did your benefit-year-end coincide with your transition to EUC?
If you began EUC on that earlier claim and the NY benefit is $100 or 25% lower than the MA benefit, then you should be eligible for an HR4213 deferral to continue EUC benefits on the MA claim. You would need to deal with both states to get this done. Coordinating this may be difficult. You would need to prove to MA that the NY claim is H4213 eligible. MA is not the easiest state to work with these days.
That said, keep in mind, under current legislation, all federal EUC payments end December 28, 2013. So, you may be glad to have that NY claim if EUC is not extended into 2014.
My bye was on November 9, still on Regular unemployment, so I applied for an extention tier 1 but they told me I don't qualified for extension since I worked in NY, how much you think I will get in NY if I made from April to August like 11000$? Do I qualified for HR4213? I'm collecting in MA 183$ per week., I worked from April to August in NY, came back to MA and reopen my claim for Regular UI, but in November 9 was the bye. What should I do? Actually I regret taking the job in NY
And what happen if NY denied my benefits for late claim, I worked from April to August and is November now, ?? Will MA let me keep the old claim if NY denied it??
And what happen if NY denied my benefits for late claim, I worked from April to August and is November now, ?? Will MA let me keep the old claim if NY denied it??
NY won't deny your claim as long as there are base-year earnings available at the time you apply. Yes, you can go back to the MA claim if NY denies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klins1228
how much you think I will get in NY if I made from April to August like 11000$?
You may or may not qualify in NY.
Answer these three questions, please:
What did you earn in NY for the quarter ending June 2013?
What did you earn in NY for the quarter ending September 2013?
How many weeks total did you work in NY?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klins1228
My bye was on November 9, still on Regular unemployment, so I applied for an extention tier 1 but they told me I don't qualified for extension since I worked in NY, Do I qualified for HR4213?
No. Because you never received EUC before your benefit year-end. A new state claim opened before you begin EUC on the earlier claim voids your rights to that EUC.
Ending in June 2013 I earned 6000$ and endings September I earned like 5000$, I worked from April 2013 -August 2013, if NY benefits is lower by 25% I have the option to go back on MA extention, right? How much you think I'll get in New York?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
