Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-03-2017, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Paranoid State
13,044 posts, read 13,872,320 times
Reputation: 15839

Advertisements

Federal and data show that beginning in 2013, in the majority of sparsely populated U.S. counties, more people died than were born -- the first time that's happened since the dawn of universal birth registration in the 1930s.

Starting in the 1980s, the nation's basket cases were its urban areas -- where a toxic stew of crime, drugs and suburban flight conspired to make large cities the slowest-growing and most troubled places.

Today, however, a Wall Street Journal analysis shows that by many key measures of socioeconomic well-being, those charts have flipped. In terms of poverty, college attainment, teenage births, divorce, death rates from heart disease and cancer, reliance on federal disability insurance and male labor-force participation, rural counties now rank the worst among the four major U.S. population groupings (the others are big cities, suburbs and medium or small metro areas).

Rural America Is the New 'Inner City'

http://www.wsj.com/articles/rural-am...ity-1495817008
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2017, 10:50 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,796,716 times
Reputation: 35920
^^I don't know where they're getting that breakdown, as the census bureau doesn't track suburbs separately. Their divisions are urban and rural.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 03:33 PM
 
2,695 posts, read 3,773,513 times
Reputation: 3085
Since there is a paywall to read this article, I cannot comment on the specific details. This FOX Business article provides a few more details about the WSJ article.

More often than not, I see rural towns on the decline for many reasons. People move for jobs and the job growth is not in rural, isolated areas of the country. Generally speaking, job growth occurs in larger metros across the country. Manufacturing jobs have been leaving the U.S. for decades, which has caused further decline of many rural areas. Many of these small towns may have only 1 major employer and once that big company is gone, rarely does something else come in and take its place.

I don't see a turn around for many rural areas anytime soon, if there is no clear way to create jobs in sparsely populated areas. There is no one simple answer to solving such a problem of American rural decline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top