Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-11-2021, 06:51 AM
 
13,005 posts, read 18,896,239 times
Reputation: 9251

Advertisements

About 30 years ago, Joel Garreau wrote "Edge City," about suburban commercial developments. They had many flaws, such as car dependence, bad traffic and being convenient only in one direction from Center City. They are now mostly abandoned as young people don't want to drive that far and many prefer urban living. But fear of contagion could bring some of them back. Your thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-14-2021, 08:22 AM
 
11,230 posts, read 9,308,278 times
Reputation: 32252
Mostly abandoned? In what universe?

Come to Dallas and show me the ”abandoned suburban commercial developments”.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2021, 12:39 PM
 
13,005 posts, read 18,896,239 times
Reputation: 9251
Go to Hoffman Estates IL or parts of NJ, even VA
You'll find them. Yes, abandoned malls, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2021, 12:56 PM
 
Location: Queens, New York
765 posts, read 620,525 times
Reputation: 2500
Depending on how remore working/working from home sticks around, suburbs may get a renewal from people wanting to live in less densely populated areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2021, 02:15 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,157 posts, read 7,980,515 times
Reputation: 10123
Yes maybe. I see it happening know in American big city edge cities.

Ie, Newark and Bridgeport to NYC, Haverhill and Worcester to Boston.

Mostly due to cost and access to things other than just city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2021, 08:37 PM
 
3,438 posts, read 4,450,556 times
Reputation: 3683
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
About 30 years ago, Joel Garreau wrote "Edge City," about suburban commercial developments. They had many flaws, such as car dependence, bad traffic and being convenient only in one direction from Center City. They are now mostly abandoned as young people don't want to drive that far and many prefer urban living. But fear of contagion could bring some of them back. Your thoughts?
Only in some ill-informed urbanophile's dreams.

Not sure how transit-dependence is a positive objective for anyone especially when contrasted with the independence a car provides.

Some places may have traffic problems - but that's going between a place that's not so great (employment in the city) to a place where you can actually have a yard, housing not connected to your neighbors, decent school district, lower crime rates, your own garage, and generally distance between you and the bad that comes with the city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2021, 07:42 AM
 
Location: Queens, New York
765 posts, read 620,525 times
Reputation: 2500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
Go to Hoffman Estates IL or parts of NJ, even VA
You'll find them. Yes, abandoned malls, too.
There are definitely a fair amount of abandoned malls. That's mostly due to rising rent costs, rising online shopping, and several of the companies that act as anchor stores in malls going out of business or facing difficulties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2021, 02:33 PM
 
3,438 posts, read 4,450,556 times
Reputation: 3683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingo Gibby View Post
My guess is that most of the anti-car advocates are single males who have never attempted to take a couple of preschoolers to an appointment or, better yet, shopping via mass transit.
Quite typical for this forum.

They also have:
i) problems with definitions of terms like "suburb";

ii) an inability to understand why others are not interested in their lifestyle or re-visiting dormitory living;

iii) an inability to sell others on a mythical housing environment so they attack reality;

iv) an inability to sell others on an actually undesirable housing environment (for others) so they try to attack everywhere else as somehow being inferior or failing;

v) a fascination with choo-choo trains;

vi) hatred for folks that own and utilize cars for utilitarian purposes rather than mere recreational purposes;

vii) hatred for parking lots and private open space;

viii) a need to generate a vocabulary of fluffy, ambiguous words ("urban fabric") or perjorative words ("car dependent") to support a communitarian/socialistic agenda (e.g., anti-car, pro transit-dependence, pro small living quarters ("you don't need a yard..."))

Fundamentally, most also likely aren't in the income bracket or property valuation bracket to suffer the taxes they want everyone else to spend to support the mythical lifestyle they seek.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2021, 06:39 AM
 
Location: 404
3,006 posts, read 1,491,307 times
Reputation: 2599
In many suburbs, kids' lives are limited by parents' availability to drive them everywhere. Walking to a neighbors' house could be "too dangerous." Child Services may be called on parents who let their kids walk to school. When they can't get rides, kids will probably stay inside and do something sedentary like play video games.

Driving is becoming less affordable for most of the nation, with repairs, insurance, fuel, and seven year car loans. The many excuses in posts above won't make driving cheaper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2021, 06:41 AM
 
Location: Queens, New York
765 posts, read 620,525 times
Reputation: 2500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nattering Heights View Post
In many suburbs, kids' lives are limited by parents' availability to drive them everywhere. Walking to a neighbors' house could be "too dangerous." Child Services may be called on parents who let their kids walk to school. When they can't get rides, kids will probably stay inside and do something sedentary like play video games.

Driving is becoming less affordable for most of the nation, with repairs, insurance, fuel, and seven year car loans. The many excuses in posts above won't make driving cheaper.
Gee, it's almost like some people want improved public transport infrastructure for concrete reasons, not just whatever bs their opponents think they want it for!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top