Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-09-2015, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,525 posts, read 75,333,969 times
Reputation: 16620

Advertisements

There were debates on how strong the sun was during Maunder Minimum days but new study came to a conclusion...



[1507.05191] The Maunder minimum (1645--1715) was indeed a Grand minimum: A reassessment of multiple datasets

"Conclusions: We conclude that solar activity was indeed at an exceptionally low level during the Maunder minimum. Although the exact level is still unclear, it was definitely below that during the Dalton minimum around 1800 and significantly below that of the current solar cycle #24. Claims of a moderate-to-high level of solar activity during the Maunder minimum are rejected at a high confidence level."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2015, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,525 posts, read 75,333,969 times
Reputation: 16620
Goodnight

NASA/Marshall Solar Physics

http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/im..._predict_l.gif

Latest prediction from NASA is now lower.

its current predicted and observed size makes this the smallest sunspot cycle since Cycle 14 in February of 1906, according to NASA

Note that Cycle 24’s peak (today) is lower than Cycle 23’s peak.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2015, 12:52 AM
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
11,655 posts, read 12,960,282 times
Reputation: 6391
So was the "low peak" projection for the 21st century accurate? We had both very hot and cold records in the past 15 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2015, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,525 posts, read 75,333,969 times
Reputation: 16620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theropod View Post
So was the "low peak" projection for the 21st century accurate? We had both very hot and cold records in the past 15 years.
Goes by cycles rather than decades or centuries.

From NASA Dec. 21, 2006:

"Evidence is mounting: the next solar cycle is going to be a big one. Solar cycle 24, due to peak in 2010 or 2011 “looks like its going to be one of the most intense cycles since record-keeping began almost 400 years ago,” says solar physicist David Hathaway of the Marshall Space Flight Center.

He and colleague Robert Wilson presented this conclusion last week at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco."

So what actually happened?

Instead of being “one of the most intense cycles since record-keeping began,” it turns out that solar cycle 24 is the weakest solar cycle in more than 200 years.

And people still out there believe in future predictions of sun, sea level, & global temps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,525 posts, read 75,333,969 times
Reputation: 16620
Interesting read on how they are predicting the solar peak.



More info with link.

"The most accurate method for predicting the amplitude of the next solar cycle is to use the strength of the solar polar magnetic fields at solar minimum. But with solar minimum likely to be three years away, who can wait that long?

The strength of the solar polar magnetic fields at solar minimum is a very accurate indicator of the maximum amplitude of the following solar cycle, as per this graph from Dr David Hathaway of NASA"

"In summary, a few methodologies are givings us predictions for Solar Cycle 25 which straddle the amplitudes of the Solar Cycles 5 and 6 of the Dalton Minimum which had maximum amplitudes of 49.2 and 48.7 respectively"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2016, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,525 posts, read 75,333,969 times
Reputation: 16620
Default Sun Goes Blank

WHOA!





Good read. More with link!


3:00 PM | *The sun has gone completely blank*


Quote:
The sun has gone completely blank. This may not last too long, but at least for now, there are currently no visible sunspots – a sure sign of an approaching solar minimum - and this is the first spotless day on the sun since 2014. In fact, there has been only one spotless day on the sun since 2011 – until today that is. The current solar cycle is the 24th since 1755 when extensive recording of solar sunspot activity began. Solar cycle number 24 is the weakest solar cycle in more than a century with the fewest sunspots since cycle 14 peaked in February 1906.


Second, it is pretty well understood that solar activity has a direct impact on temperatures at very high altitudes in a part of the Earth’s atmosphere called the thermosphere. This is the biggest layer of the Earth’s atmosphere which lies directly above the mesosphere and below the exosphere. Thermospheric temperatures increase with altitude due to absorption of highly energetic solar radiation and are highly dependent on solar activity.

Finally, if history is any guide, it is safe to say that weak solar activity for a prolonged period of time can have a cooling impact on global temperatures in the troposphere which is the bottom-most layer of Earth’s atmosphere - and where we all live. There have been two notable historical periods with decades-long episodes of low solar activity. The first period is known as the “Maunder Minimum”, named after the solar astronomer Edward Maunder, and it lasted from around 1645 to 1715. The second one is referred to as the “Dalton Minimum”, named for the English meteorologist John Dalton, and it lasted from about 1790 to 1830 (above).


Both of these historical periods coincided with colder-than-normal global temperatures in an era that is now referred to by many scientists as the “Little Ice Age”. One of the reasons prolonged periods of weak solar activity may be associated with colder global temperatures has to do with a complicated relationship between solar activity, cosmic rays, and clouds on Earth. Research studies in recent years have found that in times of low solar activity - where solar winds are typically weak - more cosmic rays reach the Earth’s atmosphere which, in turn, has been found to lead to an increase in certain types of clouds that can act to cool the Earth.







Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2016, 12:33 PM
 
29,537 posts, read 19,626,354 times
Reputation: 4549
At what point will these low or no sun spots begin to cool the earth? We've been getting record months year after year. Maybe AGW is a dominant driver over all other factors right now.




I'm not seeing a correlation

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2016, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,525 posts, read 75,333,969 times
Reputation: 16620
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
At what point will these low or no sun spots begin to cool the earth? We've been getting record months year after year. Maybe AGW is a dominant driver over all other factors right now.




I'm not seeing a correlation
How come 2008 isnt on your Top 10 hottest years and look at the sunspots then.

Pretty sure there is a huge lag time too, but we been peaking with the sun.

In fact maybe there isnt a lag time. 1998 and 2015 come to mind for hot global years, right? Look at the sun chart. Thats exactly when we reached the peak sun in Cycle 23 and Cycle 24.

And this.. you think its coincidence the warming and Ice Ages came during Solar Maxima and Minimum?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2016, 01:04 PM
 
29,537 posts, read 19,626,354 times
Reputation: 4549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambium View Post
How come 2008 isnt on your Top 10 hottest years and look at the sunspots then.
15th warmest on record


https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201513

Quote:
Pretty sure there is a huge lag time too, but we been peaking with the sun.

In fact maybe there isnt a lag time. 1998 and 2015 come to mind for hot global years, right? Look at the sun chart. Thats exactly when we reached the peak sun in Cycle 23 and Cycle 24.

Ocean cycles, and sun spots definitely play a role, but the more I read, the more I'm becoming convinced that GHGs are dominant right now. Though I don't buy into the dire climate model projections


Quote:
However, many scientists are not convinced. Georg Feulner, the deputy chair of the Earth system analysis research domain at the Potsdam Institute on Climate Change Research, has studied the effect a solar minimum might have on Earth's climate. His research has shown that temperature drops correlated to a less intense sun would be insignificant compared with anthropogenic global warming, according to the Washington Post.

Regarding the Maunder Minimum predicted by Zharkova, Feulner said, "The expected decrease in global temperature would be 0.1 degrees Celsius at most, compared to about 1.3 degrees Celsius since pre-industrial times by the year 2030," Feulner told the Post. Furthermore, this isn't the first time research has predicted waning heat from the sun, to which experts also said that man-made global warming won't be trumped.
Is a Mini Ice Age Coming? 'Maunder Minimum' Spurs Controversy


Quote:
And this.. you think its coincidence the warming and Ice Ages came during Solar Maxima and Minimum?
They don't coincide with sunspots. Ice Ages and Inter Glacial periods coincide with the Milankovitch Cycles
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2016, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,525 posts, read 75,333,969 times
Reputation: 16620
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
Ocean cycles, and sun spots definitely play a role
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
I'm not seeing a correlation
So on one hand you agree it has a role, on the other you can't see the correlation.


We will never see a 100% exact correlation. Look at the whole picture.


You've taken on a different approach to things lately. Not sure if you're reading the wrong things or just your opinion changed because something happened, but I remember it being different before recently.
Between the PDO and now this. We both can find things that support our opinion, I get that, (it gets old after time) but if you think the Sun doesn't affect weather & climate on Earth that's crazy. It doesn't take a genius to see what the long term effect is.. Just look at the graph. We're still in Modern Maxima, hence all the hot years recently


But you cant say "hey look, the sun is quiet, its gonna be cold tomorrow" It doesn't work like that.


Also understand Urban Heat Islands and "local" warming is different now. We didn't have Jumbo airplanes and blacktop in the 1800s. So you have to factor that in as well...or at least remember it.


I think it's fascinating , I always loved Science , but I don't think we should go back and forth and try to prove one theory or another. There's still a ton of work and research to be done.. I myself will stick to NASA with the info and charts provided.. I know there's more to learn!


NASA/Marshall Solar Physics


What's Wrong with the Sun? - NASA Science


Understanding the sun-climate connection
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top