Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So I found these interesting Koppen maps on Wiki, they probably are not super accurate, but I think they do a pretty good job. So which of the following states/provinces have the most diverse climates? Also something to keep in mind is that some of these states only have a tiny microclimate that represents one of the climates, so for instance Washington has 14 distinct climates, but it's only dominated by 4 or 5 of them. Also some climates are more similar than others. Also when voting pick your top three picks.
I would have guessed California would be #1 followed by Alaska and then BC just due to the size, latitudinal spread and mountainous terrain.
Yeah I had a similar inclination, but it's understandable why Colorado would be so high since it straddles both sides of the rockies so it experience different precipitation patterns whereas California only experiences mediterranean precipitation patterns. Also considering how large they are, they're not all that diverse only in there most southern regions are they super diverse.
Also I think this map uses colder thresholds for C climates since it considers Spokane to be Csb even though it's Dsb.
Those are some nice maps, but I prefer the 0°C isotherm for C/D climate split.
I originally put California, but I can also see Colorado because it has more variation in precipitation seasonality.
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,615,202 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by grega94
Yeah I had a similar inclination, but it's understandable why Colorado would be so high since it straddles both sides of the rockies so it experience different precipitation patterns whereas California only experiences mediterranean precipitation patterns. Also considering how large they are, they're not all that diverse only in there most southern regions are they super diverse.
Also I think this map uses colder thresholds for C climates since it considers Spokane to be Csb even though it's Dsb.
Not all of CA is mediterranean precip pattern, the deserts and mountains get the summer monsoon
This is because I prefer to look at extremes of climate and large they are. No place in Alaska for example has hot summers, all of Colorado's climate zones are elevation-inspired and the state lacks a sea-level frost-rare climate, which in my mind disqualifies them.
California wins due to the mere co-existence of Eureka and Death Valley. It's a shoe-in. British Columbia is in second due to Tofino, Osoyoos and Fort Nelson being in the same province.
LaPush and Spokane combine to make Washington third.
This is because I prefer to look at extremes of climate and large they are. No place in Alaska for example has hot summers, all of Colorado's climate zones are elevation-inspired and the state lacks a sea-level frost-rare climate, which in my mind disqualifies them.
California wins due to the mere co-existence of Eureka and Death Valley. It's a shoe-in. British Columbia is in second due to Tofino, Osoyoos and Fort Nelson being in the same province.
LaPush and Spokane combine to make Washington third.
Spokane isn't even that dry or hot, Tri cities are much hotter and drier.
Those are some nice maps, but I prefer the 0°C isotherm for C/D climate split.
I originally put California, but I can also see Colorado because it has more variation in precipitation seasonality.
I agree about the 0 deg split. I find it quite hard to call Cleveland or Philadelphia "subtropical".
This is because I prefer to look at extremes of climate and large they are. No place in Alaska for example has hot summers, all of Colorado's climate zones are elevation-inspired and the state lacks a sea-level frost-rare climate, which in my mind disqualifies them.
California wins due to the mere co-existence of Eureka and Death Valley. It's a shoe-in. British Columbia is in second due to Tofino, Osoyoos and Fort Nelson being in the same province.
LaPush and Spokane combine to make Washington third.
Yes, this makes a lot of sense. Rather than counting Köppen it's better to consider extremes of temperature and precipitation. California, BC, and Washington do well in this regard. However, I'd suggest putting BC on top: neither California nor Washington have a real subarctic climate.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.