Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-20-2012, 08:01 AM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,207,220 times
Reputation: 5481

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yzette View Post
I've mentioned this on other threads, but if your employees routinely work late, one of three things is going on: They are underqualified for their jobs, they have personal problems and don't want to go home, or you're understaffed.
I would disagree with this. Blanket statements such as this are dangerous to make. Sometimes you are correct, but other times there are legitimate needs for employees to work late. If everyone took your advice, absolutely no high tech startups would exist, as one example.

 
Old 03-20-2012, 09:14 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,774,139 times
Reputation: 7020
I think we should do like Germany and France and go to a 32-35 hour work week.
 
Old 03-20-2012, 09:40 AM
 
917 posts, read 2,005,321 times
Reputation: 723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
I think we should do like Germany and France and go to a 32-35 hour work week.
I agree.
 
Old 03-20-2012, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Providence
335 posts, read 939,242 times
Reputation: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tober138 View Post
Not every salaried position is based on "40 hours per week." I question why people seem to think that once a salaried person works more than 40 hours that they are somehow working for free.



In my experience, when people are hired for a salaried position (at least once they reach a certain level) - the bottom line is getting their job done properly and on-time, the actual hours do not matter, whether it takes 35 or 45 per week.



I also find there is more flexibility in terms of one's time. As I said before, I average about 45 hours per week (sometimes a bit more around certain deadlines). But at the same time, if I want to take a long lunch to run a few errands or if I need to take a few hours for a personal matter like a doctor's appointment, to get to a game or concert after work, or just to sleep in a bit, I can just do that - I don't have to punch a clock or get approval for "time off" (I may shoot my boss or our admin a quick e-mail to let them know I'll be in a few hours late or leaving a few hours early, but it is just an FYI, not a request). At the end of the day - as long as I get my job done right and on-time, no one worries about how many hours my butt is physically behind my desk.

I would much rather be in this type of position where I may work a bit longer than others, but have a lot more personal flexibility than a clock-puncher. But, as I've also said before, this kind of set-up works for me. If others have a different take on how they structure their work / life balance - totally cool. To each their own.





Or...possibly they work with clients acrossss the country or internationally and have to adjust for those time differences. Or many people at smaller start-up companies often put in a lot more hours because they are working to get that company off the ground so it can succeed. In short, there can be many reasons why some people put in longer hours - it is not always due to poor management (by the employee and / or the management).

And most people in high level positions (VP / CEO, etc) likely did not get to that level by always working only 8 hours per day, M-F.
This is true in my case...my Director works crazy hours because we have client business in Europe and APAC which requires her to be on certain calls (me too sometimes). I am levels below her and I work at least 45 hours per week, it's just expected of anyone in the management level to work whatever necessary to get the work done. I see her working at 1am and I don't want that for myself, ever. But if you want to move forward and earn a higher salary, it is almost certainly required.
 
Old 03-20-2012, 10:25 AM
 
8,679 posts, read 15,269,059 times
Reputation: 15342
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
I would disagree with this. Blanket statements such as this are dangerous to make. Sometimes you are correct, but other times there are legitimate needs for employees to work late. If everyone took your advice, absolutely no high tech startups would exist, as one example.
Keyword in my post: "routinely." Once in a while for a big project, sure. It can even be an occasion for team-building, with having food brought in and so on.

As for high-tech start-ups, they are notorious for being misery factories. Many start-ups are, regardless of field. I interviewed at one in New York, a company that was developing "health care solutions." It was like stepping into a morgue. It was a big bull pen where people were hunched over computers set up on lunch tables. No one talked. No one had any photos in their workspaces. No plants. The interviewer noted that people were working 60 hours per week, sometimes more, and had been doing so for over a year. She pointed to a tissue box on the table in the conference room where we spoke and said, "Sometimes there are tears."

From what I understand, that kind of environment is not uncommon.

My attitude about that is "Yeah, right. Thank you, drive through, find another wage slave."

If they don't have the funding to pay for adequate staffing, they shouldn't be starting up. That's why so many of them fail.
 
Old 03-20-2012, 10:50 AM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,207,220 times
Reputation: 5481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yzette View Post
Keyword in my post: "routinely." Once in a while for a big project, sure. It can even be an occasion for team-building, with having food brought in and so on.

As for high-tech start-ups, they are notorious for being misery factories. Many start-ups are, regardless of field. I interviewed at one in New York, a company that was developing "health care solutions." It was like stepping into a morgue. It was a big bull pen where people were hunched over computers set up on lunch tables. No one talked. No one had any photos in their workspaces. No plants. The interviewer noted that people were working 60 hours per week, sometimes more, and had been doing so for over a year. She pointed to a tissue box on the table in the conference room where we spoke and said, "Sometimes there are tears."

From what I understand, that kind of environment is not uncommon.

My attitude about that is "Yeah, right. Thank you, drive through, find another wage slave."

If they don't have the funding to pay for adequate staffing, they shouldn't be starting up. That's why so many of them fail.
Again, I disagree. For your typical type-A personality, what you describe would be nothing short of miserable. There are types of people (me included) who would absolutely hate the idea of working 40 hours, punching a clock and going home. The kind of people who sign up for high tech startups have a blast at it. They work because they enjoy it and love creating something new.

If you want a job just to pay the bills, then you would be right. Working 60 hours/week would be miserable. But if you want something more than money from your job, it is far from a 'misery factory'.

Hell, I a few weeks ago I called in to work from vacation on a beach because I had three hours with nothing planned and I simply enjoy my job. Your view on things only holds water if you assume people hate what they do for a living.
 
Old 03-20-2012, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
3,879 posts, read 8,384,203 times
Reputation: 5184
I've never worked more than 40 hours per week regularly. I even had one job that was only 37 weekly.

Personally I think we should go down to a 35 hour. For my job, I could personally be just as productive in 30-35. The rest is all mind-numbing downtime. Such a waste of time.
 
Old 03-20-2012, 10:59 AM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,207,220 times
Reputation: 5481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Crabcakes View Post
I've never worked more than 40 hours per week regularly. I even had one job that was only 37 weekly.

Personally I think we should go down to a 35 hour. For my job, I could personally be just as productive in 30-35. The rest is all mind-numbing downtime. Such a waste of time.
So why don't you get it done in 30 hours and pick up 10 more hours of work? Do more than what your job is now?
 
Old 03-20-2012, 11:15 AM
 
977 posts, read 1,815,305 times
Reputation: 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
Hell, I a few weeks ago I called in to work from vacation on a beach because I had three hours with nothing planned and I simply enjoy my job. Your view on things only holds water if you assume people hate what they do for a living.
Good for you, corporate donkey. Maybe they don't hate what they do, but they have many other things they'd rather be doing than work, esp on vacation.
 
Old 03-20-2012, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
3,879 posts, read 8,384,203 times
Reputation: 5184
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
So why don't you get it done in 30 hours and pick up 10 more hours of work? Do more than what your job is now?
I don't even have 30 hours worth of work to do which is why I am vigilantly looking for another job. I could honestly do this job in 10 hours a week.

Its been 18 months and I am tired of begging for more work and responsibility. They just don't have anything for me to do and I'm not interested in printing things, scanning things or mailing things for people who are actually busy. My job is a total dead-end.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top