Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-17-2018, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,106 posts, read 41,277,178 times
Reputation: 45146

Advertisements

An acquaintance who runs a medical office is considering promoting an employee who is currently functioning as a receptionist at an hourly wage. She would be placed on a salary and given additional responsibilities, including taking on some of the load of correspondence for her physician employer. She also will be making decisions concerning the urgency of scheduling patients with problems, and making judgment calls in sending some patients directly to the hospital. That would mean reviewing charts and drafting letters for his approval. She will not be managing any other employees.

She is actually overqualified as a receptionist, as she has an MBA.

From the Department of labor:

Administrative Exemptions

To qualify for the administrative employee exemption, all of the following tests must be met:
•The employee must be compensated on a salary or fee basis (as defined in the regulations) at a rate not less than $455* per week;
•The employee’s primary duty must be the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers; and
•The employee’s primary duty includes the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance.

She meets the first two criteria. His question is whether her additional duties meet the last test. The goal is to give her more responsibility, use her MBA skills, but not incur overtime costs. She will certainly be doing a lot more than a receptionist would, though she would continue to do that, too, and what she does would be of significance to patients, as many of the letters impact such things as disability determinations.

What say you, labor law gurus?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-17-2018, 09:08 PM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,050,479 times
Reputation: 21914
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
An acquaintance who runs a medical office is considering promoting an employee who is currently functioning as a receptionist at an hourly wage. She would be placed on a salary and given additional responsibilities, including taking on some of the load of correspondence for her physician employer. She also will be making decisions concerning the urgency of scheduling patients with problems, and making judgment calls in sending some patients directly to the hospital. That would mean reviewing charts and drafting letters for his approval. She will not be managing any other employees.

She is actually overqualified as a receptionist, as she has an MBA.

From the Department of labor:

Administrative Exemptions

To qualify for the administrative employee exemption, all of the following tests must be met:
•The employee must be compensated on a salary or fee basis (as defined in the regulations) at a rate not less than $455* per week;
•The employee’s primary duty must be the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers; and
•The employee’s primary duty includes the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance.

She meets the first two criteria. His question is whether her additional duties meet the last test. The goal is to give her more responsibility, use her MBA skills, but not incur overtime costs. She will certainly be doing a lot more than a receptionist would, though she would continue to do that, too, and what she does would be of significance to patients, as many of the letters impact such things as disability determinations.

What say you, labor law gurus?
I think you answered your own question. Please read the portion of your post that I call out in bold print.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2018, 09:31 PM
 
13,130 posts, read 21,001,609 times
Reputation: 21410
As a business owner, I fully agree with fishbrains that the level of independent and discretionary authority on significant matters meets the standard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2018, 10:00 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,106 posts, read 41,277,178 times
Reputation: 45146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabrrita View Post
As a business owner, I fully agree with fishbrains that the level of independent and discretionary authority on significant matters meets the standard.
Thanks! Cannot rep you again yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top