Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-13-2016, 11:43 PM
 
1,889 posts, read 1,324,592 times
Reputation: 957

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grigoriachel View Post
Many of these 'tendencies' may be influenced by heredity which might complicate this conjecture.
I think you're already aware of the following: Behavioral Epigenetics

However this is kind of drifting in biology, which is not really relevant to the thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-14-2016, 05:31 AM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,567 posts, read 28,665,617 times
Reputation: 25165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Randal Walker View Post
Discussion largely based on historical precedents, or patterns from history. I have seen comments that we are at the end of an age.
What countries do you consider to be the West?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 09:53 AM
 
Location: Somewhere in Southern Italy
2,974 posts, read 2,815,589 times
Reputation: 1495
The West will be at a crossroads and will have to choose between nationalism and isolationism, ideologies who are becoming more and more popular in the USA and several European countries, or a common destiny and closer ties to counter the growing influence of developing countries such as China, India, ecc.

Another problem that the West will have to face is the ageing population (UK, France and USA being the exception) and immigration coming from Subsaharian Africa/Middle East/East and Southern Asia for Europe; Southern and Central America/East and Southern Asia for the USA and Canada, Southern and Eastern Asia for Australia. This immigration could be key for these countries to offset their ageing population but they have to be careful with it as they must try to retain their national identities and culture and therefore either establish a peaceful coexistence or integrate them in their own society.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 11:45 AM
 
2,639 posts, read 1,994,681 times
Reputation: 1988
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
What countries do you consider to be the West?
Western/Central Europe, U.S.A. & Canada, Australia & New Zealand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 12:19 PM
 
400 posts, read 422,510 times
Reputation: 523
What future? Our future is Poverty for the many and comfort for the few.

The West (Western Europe, North America, Japan) has offshored its production of sophisticated manufactures to the emerging nations and thereby has dismantled the ladders of opportunity for a huge swath of its people. Canada's current account deficit today is north of $50 Billion (..and we don't have the luxury of issuing a reserve currency like the Americans) because most manufactured products we use today are made offshore. I read a stat a few years ago in a Manufactuing trade journal to the effect that, in the ten years ending in 2011, in the USA 54,620 (!!) manufacturing facilities that employed north of 6 million people LEFT the United States.

So, let's see now...we in the West have trained vast segments of the workforces of foreign countries in the organizational methods, procedures and the technologies that took a century to acquire, built their factories for them and allowed tariff free entry of the products that were produced in those facilities. In the process, huge numbers of our graduates exiting our institutions of higher learning can't find any jobs that would make use of their skills and talents because those jobs are now being performed by chinese, vietnamese, mexicans, and malaysians and so on. So Jobs, which most people need to survive as they can't depend on accumulated assets, are now paid less than ever before because corporations are bidding for labour 'over there' and not here.

Meanwhile, at least in Canada's case, the dollars foreigners earn from selling us their junk are being recycled into the Real estate of our major cities such that the average young person can't even afford to buy a modest home. When policies lead to a reduction in real wages for the majority combined with higher asset/housing prices, I call that 'impoverishment'. Except for the top 10% (government bureaucrats, shareholders, top CEOs, professionals), the future ain't here, that's for sure. Unless you don't mind flipping real estate or making condos.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Katy,Texas
6,474 posts, read 4,074,569 times
Reputation: 4522
Quote:
Originally Posted by lookyhere View Post
What future? Our future is Poverty for the many and comfort for the few.

The West (Western Europe, North America, Japan) has offshored its production of sophisticated manufactures to the emerging nations and thereby has dismantled the ladders of opportunity for a huge swath of its people. Canada's current account deficit today is north of $50 Billion (..and we don't have the luxury of issuing a reserve currency like the Americans) because most manufactured products we use today are made offshore. I read a stat a few years ago in a Manufactuing trade journal to the effect that, in the ten years ending in 2011, in the USA 54,620 (!!) manufacturing facilities that employed north of 6 million people LEFT the United States.

So, let's see now...we in the West have trained vast segments of the workforces of foreign countries in the organizational methods, procedures and the technologies that took a century to acquire, built their factories for them and allowed tariff free entry of the products that were produced in those facilities. In the process, huge numbers of our graduates exiting our institutions of higher learning can't find any jobs that would make use of their skills and talents because those jobs are now being performed by chinese, vietnamese, mexicans, and malaysians and so on. So Jobs, which most people need to survive as they can't depend on accumulated assets, are now paid less than ever before because corporations are bidding for labour 'over there' and not here.

Meanwhile, at least in Canada's case, the dollars foreigners earn from selling us their junk are being recycled into the Real estate of our major cities such that the average young person can't even afford to buy a modest home. When policies lead to a reduction in real wages for the majority combined with higher asset/housing prices, I call that 'impoverishment'. Except for the top 10% (government bureaucrats, shareholders, top CEOs, professionals), the future ain't here, that's for sure. Unless you don't mind flipping real estate or making condos.
Good point but a pet peeve I have is that you mistake "The West" for developed nation. Japan although it had western influence from American control in the past, the country is not western. It is East Asian at best. Here are a list of prominent Western Nations. U.S.A, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, U.K, Switzerland,Denmark Sweden, France, Norway, Finland? and Austria. East of Austria and Germany is the end of the west and the beginning of Soviet influenced nations.
Here is a couple developed nations that are not western, meaning West European (Including North Europe and South Europe excluding Greece and the Balkans) or a country founded by West Europeans (South Africa is debatable if it a western nation).
Japan, South Korea, U.A.E, Qatar, Israel, Singapore, Kuwait, Brunei, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau. Their are a few more that are more debatable including many small island nations that are basically still British territories or dependent completely on tourism so are disproportionally represented. The other debatable ones are Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman and a few others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Katy,Texas
6,474 posts, read 4,074,569 times
Reputation: 4522
Quote:
Originally Posted by lookyhere View Post
What future? Our future is Poverty for the many and comfort for the few.

The West (Western Europe, North America, Japan) has offshored its production of sophisticated manufactures to the emerging nations and thereby has dismantled the ladders of opportunity for a huge swath of its people. Canada's current account deficit today is north of $50 Billion (..and we don't have the luxury of issuing a reserve currency like the Americans) because most manufactured products we use today are made offshore. I read a stat a few years ago in a Manufactuing trade journal to the effect that, in the ten years ending in 2011, in the USA 54,620 (!!) manufacturing facilities that employed north of 6 million people LEFT the United States.

So, let's see now...we in the West have trained vast segments of the workforces of foreign countries in the organizational methods, procedures and the technologies that took a century to acquire, built their factories for them and allowed tariff free entry of the products that were produced in those facilities. In the process, huge numbers of our graduates exiting our institutions of higher learning can't find any jobs that would make use of their skills and talents because those jobs are now being performed by chinese, vietnamese, mexicans, and malaysians and so on. So Jobs, which most people need to survive as they can't depend on accumulated assets, are now paid less than ever before because corporations are bidding for labour 'over there' and not here.

Meanwhile, at least in Canada's case, the dollars foreigners earn from selling us their junk are being recycled into the Real estate of our major cities such that the average young person can't even afford to buy a modest home. When policies lead to a reduction in real wages for the majority combined with higher asset/housing prices, I call that 'impoverishment'. Except for the top 10% (government bureaucrats, shareholders, top CEOs, professionals), the future ain't here, that's for sure. Unless you don't mind flipping real estate or making condos.
Good point but a pet peeve I have is that you mistake "The West" for developed nation. Japan although it has western influence from American control over the country is not western. It is East Asian at best. Here are a list of prominent Western Nations. U.S.A, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, U.K, Switzerland,Denmark Sweden, France, Norway, Finland? and Austria. East of Austria and Germany is the end of the west and the beginning of Soviet influenced nations.
Here is a couple developed nations that are not western, meaning West European (Including North Europe and South Europe excluding Greece and the Balkans) or a country founded by West Europeans (South Africa is debatable if it a western nation).
Japan, South Korea, U.A.E, Qatar, Israel, Singapore, Kuwait, Brunei, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau. Their are a few more that are more debatable including many small island nations that are basically still British territories or dependent completely on tourism so are disproportionally represented. The other debatable ones are Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman and a few others. Another group is developed Eastern European nations
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 01:53 PM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,480,204 times
Reputation: 12187
It would be interesting to time travel and see if other world powers were diverse from migrations. We tend to think of Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, Rome, etc as homogeneous when they might have been more diverse during their height. I know many Italian Americans have significant amounts of Sub-Saharan African ancestry (often up to 10%), at some point there was a large number of Blacks in Italy, same with North African.


The West is choosing diversity rather than cutting back on the welfare state that needs many young workers to support it. East Asia has the same low fertility rate but remains anti immigration. It will be interesting to see which strategy works out the best, both have pros and cons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 02:42 PM
 
Location: western East Roman Empire
9,367 posts, read 14,313,867 times
Reputation: 10085
Quote:
Originally Posted by NigerianNightmare View Post
Good point but a pet peeve I have is that you mistake "The West" for developed nation. Japan .... Here is a couple developed nations ...
Let it be a pet peeve of yours if you want, but the so-called "west", some nebulous cultural term that no one can agree on, is irrelevant to economic history - who remembers the first humans who stood upright? who remembers the first group of hunter-gatherers? who remembers the first agricultural settlement? -, what matters is industrialization, the countries of early industrialization and now its global spread a mere 200 years later, 200 years, a small pittance in human history, a tiny, tiny window. The past before that is, as mentioned, increasingly irrelevant and will very soon no longer matter at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 02:57 PM
AFP
 
7,412 posts, read 6,898,554 times
Reputation: 6632
Quote:
Originally Posted by censusdata View Post
It would be interesting to time travel and see if other world powers were diverse from migrations. We tend to think of Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, Rome, etc as homogeneous when they might have been more diverse during their height. I know many Italian Americans have significant amounts of Sub-Saharan African ancestry (often up to 10%), at some point there was a large number of Blacks in Italy, same with North African.


The West is choosing diversity rather than cutting back on the welfare state that needs many young workers to support it. East Asia has the same low fertility rate but remains anti immigration. It will be interesting to see which strategy works out the best, both have pros and cons.
Provide a source that supports your claims of 10% aDNA in Italians. There are studies that indicate that 1%-2% is not uncommon in Italians(and from very deep ancestry) entirely from the maternal side, however I have never seen any credible documentation of up to 10% in any individual unless that individual has recent Sub-Saharan African ancestors. It is also not uncommon in the US for individuals to claim hyphenated ancestries when in reality they have multiple ancestries or don't even know who their father is.

Last edited by AFP; 04-14-2016 at 03:29 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top