Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Albany area
 [Register]
Albany area Albany - Schenectady - Troy - Saratoga Springs metro area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-05-2008, 05:18 PM
 
80 posts, read 359,127 times
Reputation: 24

Advertisements

Bringing this topic back to life. Current opinions???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2008, 02:15 PM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,445,137 times
Reputation: 3647
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiminCT View Post
Hartford needs above ground ELECTRIC lines on that rail...and refurbished stations. THey still use diesel engines for the Amtrak line.

Albany...simply too small right now to warrant commuter rail
Do you realize that the metro populations of Albany and Hartford are actually comparable in size?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2008, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,917 posts, read 56,893,272 times
Reputation: 11219
Yes, Hartford and Albany are comparable in size but the rail line being proposed serves three metropolitan areas (Hartford, Springfield and New Haven) and connects to one of the busiest commuter rail lines in the world (Metro-North's New Haven line). So it would connect 2 million people to a system that serves another 5 million. a little better than the albany system. Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 11:45 AM
 
169 posts, read 418,929 times
Reputation: 66
Guys we need to step into the 21st century. I understand why people like to drive--its faster! If you can provide something faster for people to go to work, they will take it regardless of gas prices. That's why I advocate maglev, its way faster, not that expensive to construct (under 20million a mile) and has an elevated design so it can be completely grade separated simply by building it over streets. And it also has way less maintenance costs, and uses less than 70 percent electricity than conventional electric rail. Lets drop the light rail discussion, or the old commuter train. You guys need to realize this is the future, we need to do something different and take a step forward while doing so. This type of system would be extremely profitable btw.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 01:18 PM
 
169 posts, read 418,929 times
Reputation: 66
I want to say u guys are on the right track but the track you want is a maglev track, not conventional rail track. But from a figurative sense, u guys are on the right track.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 02:29 PM
 
169 posts, read 418,929 times
Reputation: 66
check out the article in TU. Front page online, about this exact issue. But between u n me, they got it wrong. Light rail sucks. Maglev, son!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Albany area

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top