Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-14-2016, 09:31 PM
 
1,551 posts, read 3,646,070 times
Reputation: 3131

Advertisements

It seems like the same reaction whenever something is in scarce supply. Just charge more for it. Sounds simple except the people that can least afford it are the ones that get hurt the most.
The people that have the money certainly don't lose any sleep because their water prices go up. They don't take less showers, they don't typically water their lawns less and they don't use their pool as a flower garden. All they do is write a bigger check.
There are other alternatives out there but most don't care about the little guy. Too bad. Get a better job. That's usually what those people hear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-15-2016, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
5,649 posts, read 5,966,125 times
Reputation: 8317
Quote:
Originally Posted by locolife View Post
Just because AZ uses less now than it did in the 50's doesn't mean we aren't wasting water. There's plenty of waste here still, I splash through intersections constantly where people let their sprinklers literally water concrete, each and every single day. The amount of lawn here and acres of desert covered in high water use winter grass for the game of golf is truly mind boggling.
^ This.

People claim its a "drop in the bucket", but take the amount of water wasted watering grass each and every day, for decades. It adds up, and quickly. And most of the people I see watering lawns are using inefficient sprinklers, half of them aimed at the street, and watering mid day.

They say it doesnt make a difference? Then ask why the city offers people money to rip up grass. Ask the people of CA why theyre using artificial lawns, or having their grass painted. It does make a difference!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2016, 11:18 AM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,959,794 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG CATS View Post
^ This.

People claim its a "drop in the bucket", but take the amount of water wasted watering grass each and every day, for decades. It adds up, and quickly. And most of the people I see watering lawns are using inefficient sprinklers, half of them aimed at the street, and watering mid day.

They say it doesnt make a difference? Then ask why the city offers people money to rip up grass. Ask the people of CA why theyre using artificial lawns, or having their grass painted. It does make a difference!
The point being that, unlike CA, we can have both agriculture and greenery in the central city through smart planning and incentives to farmers. Behind the scenes, that is the real battle, how to get farmers to switch to efficient irrigation methods. As the law stands now, they have virtually no reason to do so. You could rip up every shred of grass in Phoenix and barely scratch the surface of the actual problem. You would be trading QOL for a mere 1-2% water use reduction. That would be a bad economic move for AZ and thankfully it knows that. It knows that minimizing the visible aspects is crucial to maintaining an economy.

If you could switch farmers using flood irrigation to drip irrigation you could reduce water use as an aggregate more than 15x what would be accomplished by ripping up grass. And it wouldn't be hard, just expensive because they are gaining leverage as the drought rolls on. Much like unadjudicated streams (Gila and Little Colorado) and the tribes/parties to that adjudication.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2016, 12:01 AM
 
4,235 posts, read 14,063,176 times
Reputation: 4253
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2016, 06:34 AM
 
1,699 posts, read 2,432,751 times
Reputation: 3463
The farmers are not watering the lawn........ It is your food.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2016, 09:30 AM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,959,794 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by corydon View Post
The farmers are not watering the lawn........ It is your food.
It's more complicated than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2016, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,822 posts, read 24,321,239 times
Reputation: 32953
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGMotorsport64 View Post
It's more complicated than that.
While the overall picture is more complicated than that, Corydon's statement is one of those simple truths that cannot be denied.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2016, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Pahrump, NV
2,850 posts, read 4,521,584 times
Reputation: 2797
i found an interesting link:

Lower Colorado River Operations | Lower Colorado Region | Bureau of Reclamation

shows the lake level history of lake mead
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Chandler, AZ
4,071 posts, read 5,147,258 times
Reputation: 6169
While Lake Mead does fluctuate over time...it is not exactly the bellwether for our State Water supply. CAP gets its water from Lake Havasu, which is below Lake Mead, and brings it over to Lake Pleasant...but that is only one of our sources. SRP has multiple lakes/dams/groundwater facilities that make up their supply. There are numerous aquifers, one of the most recent found under Goodyear...and the article is claiming that we are in trouble because the lake has gone down 100 ft or so in the past 15 years? We aren't in trouble...Vegas and Central CA are as they get the lions share of their water from Lake Mead. I am all for water conservation but we are far from the sky falling here folks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 10:39 AM
 
Location: In the hot spot!
3,941 posts, read 6,727,785 times
Reputation: 4091
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtAZ View Post
While Lake Mead does fluctuate over time...it is not exactly the bellwether for our State Water supply. CAP gets its water from Lake Havasu, which is below Lake Mead, and brings it over to Lake Pleasant...but that is only one of our sources. SRP has multiple lakes/dams/groundwater facilities that make up their supply. There are numerous aquifers, one of the most recent found under Goodyear...and the article is claiming that we are in trouble because the lake has gone down 100 ft or so in the past 15 years? We aren't in trouble...Vegas and Central CA are as they get the lions share of their water from Lake Mead. I am all for water conservation but we are far from the sky falling here folks.
I hope you are right KurtAZ!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top