Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-18-2009, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Gwinn, Michigan
72 posts, read 148,343 times
Reputation: 41

Advertisements

Sorry all, i didnt mean to paint a rosey picture of Arizona's job/employment situation vs Michigan's. My brother and sister moved out to Goodyear early this summer and are having a very hard time finding jobs, so i can relate. I was just strictly comparing unemployment rates......i mean Michigan is holding top honors there at 15.4%......i think arizona is 7 -9% range.........could be wrong.

From a far, those kind of rates seem much better than Michigan's do. Michigans lower side of the unemployment rate for the past 10-15 years has been around where Arizona's is right now.

Baraga county, just north of me right now is 24.5% unemployment.......its grim! Alot of the jobs are getting lost because businesses are going under, not just laid off for a while. I doubt alot of these kind of jobs are going to come back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-18-2009, 08:35 PM
 
Location: Mesa, Az
21,144 posts, read 42,148,401 times
Reputation: 3861
Quote:
Originally Posted by krock1dk View Post
The opinion of many Michiganders towards Arizona is often the result of ignorance and disgust for the cold weather and lack of jobs. Trust me, I moved here from MI and the talk is the same there. They say the same thing about Florida too. Whenever I go back to C my family in East Lansing, many people tell me things like "I wish I was you. I should consider going there. You should go there and not come back. Your family should move there too. Arizona is the best (even though they've never been here). And I'll bet they have lots of good jobs there." I Laugh every time I here that stuff and tell em the truth from my perspective. Often they dont believe me. Nonetheless, if I found a job there I would probably move back. The people are nicer--no CA influence. GREEN GRASS. Four seasons. WATER. Excellent cost of living. And the jobs will eventually return. However, I cant stand the cold. But you cant have everything and have to take the good with the bad--shoveling snow. But the extreme heat here is just as bad, so you are simply trading one extreme for another. The funny thing is that many Michiganders who move here to get a "better life" often move back after a few years when they realize the truth that AZ isnt what they thought it was. You can have a great life, no matter where you live, and dont have to move to a sunny climate to do so.
And the reality is that you strongly prefer Michigan..........many of us '4 season' refugees hate cold weather.

Yes; the summers here can be piggish in the Phx area, that stated, what will probably wind up forcing me out of here will be the overcrowding (the #1 reason that I will not ever live in the Los Angeles area again)---------not the heat.

The above stated: the #1 reason I cringe in living in Bullhead City is due to its 5-10 degree hotter summers than here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2009, 10:18 PM
 
1,012 posts, read 2,561,455 times
Reputation: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwinn_raptor View Post
Sorry all, i didnt mean to paint a rosey picture of Arizona's job/employment situation vs Michigan's. My brother and sister moved out to Goodyear early this summer and are having a very hard time finding jobs, so i can relate. I was just strictly comparing unemployment rates......i mean Michigan is holding top honors there at 15.4%......i think arizona is 7 -9% range.........could be wrong.
You are wrong, but its OK. Arizona's unemployment rate is 9.7%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2009, 10:26 PM
 
Location: Spots Wyoming
18,700 posts, read 42,077,816 times
Reputation: 2147483647
I don't take those numbers as too solid. Where do they come from? Stats on what they track. You have 9.7 people drawing unemployment. It doesn't include those that benefits run out of. If a person is unemployed and hasn't found a job during the time of unemployment, they don't count. It's only those that are currently registered, and or, drawing unemployment.

There is no way of figuring home mom/dad that don't want employment. It doesn't count homeless. It doesn't count those that have run out of benefits and now have nothing. So, in reality, the numbers are greater.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 08:14 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,081 posts, read 51,259,863 times
Reputation: 28330
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElkHunter View Post
I don't take those numbers as too solid. Where do they come from? Stats on what they track. You have 9.7 people drawing unemployment. It doesn't include those that benefits run out of. If a person is unemployed and hasn't found a job during the time of unemployment, they don't count. It's only those that are currently registered, and or, drawing unemployment.

There is no way of figuring home mom/dad that don't want employment. It doesn't count homeless. It doesn't count those that have run out of benefits and now have nothing. So, in reality, the numbers are greater.
The US published figure is based on a household survey - not on claims filed or being paid. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics contacts about 60K households in the US and asks them if they are employed - for the purposes of this survey self-employment is counted as is "underemployment". The results are adjusted with population estimates to arrive at the number you read. Because it is a survey it is subject to all the error that surveys are - primarily sampling and definition. The household survey uses proxied or third-party answers where respondents give information on family members in the household, for example. At any rate, unemployment claims being paid or not paid are not influencing this number.

Regardless of method, as a relative measure, it is useful. Michigan's number is much worse than Arizona's and there is no doubt that unemployment there is more widespread and serious. As anyone here (Arizona) can tell you, things are bad - very bad - so I can only imagine what it is like in MI.

Last edited by Ponderosa; 09-19-2009 at 08:36 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Spots Wyoming
18,700 posts, read 42,077,816 times
Reputation: 2147483647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
The US published figure is based on a household survey - not on claims filed or being paid. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics contacts about 60K households in the US and asks them if they are employed - for the purposes of this survey self-employment is counted as is "underemployment". The results are adjusted with population estimates to arrive at the number you read. Because it is a survey it is subject to all the error that surveys are - primarily sampling and definition. The household survey uses proxied or third-party answers where respondents give information on family members in the household, for example. At any rate, unemployment claims being paid or not paid are not influencing this number.

Regardless of method, as a relative measure, it is useful. Michigan's number is much worse than Arizona's and there is no doubt that unemployment there is more widespread and serious. As anyone here (Arizona) can tell you, things are bad - very bad - so I can only imagine what it is like in MI.
I agree, the numbers are useful, just not real accurate. You can look and see one area is more reliable for employment, but exact, they are not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 10:15 AM
 
Location: SoCal desert
8,091 posts, read 15,442,060 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
The US published figure is based on a household survey - not on claims filed or being paid. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics contacts about 60K households in the US and asks them if they are employed - for the purposes of this survey self-employment is counted as is "underemployment".
less than .02% of the pop? (that's 2/100th's!)
(unless my math is wrong ... 60,000 divided by 300,000,000 plus?)

Gah. That's worse than the Nielsen TV ratings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 11:19 PM
 
1,012 posts, read 2,561,455 times
Reputation: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElkHunter View Post
I don't take those numbers as too solid. Where do they come from? Stats on what they track. You have 9.7 people drawing unemployment. It doesn't include those that benefits run out of. If a person is unemployed and hasn't found a job during the time of unemployment, they don't count. It's only those that are currently registered, and or, drawing unemployment.

There is no way of figuring home mom/dad that don't want employment. It doesn't count homeless. It doesn't count those that have run out of benefits and now have nothing. So, in reality, the numbers are greater.
You are preaching to the choir! The real unemployment rate is at least twice as high as what is reported. I can tell you that Arizona also doesnt look at illegal immigrants. They make up a huge bulk of construction, landscaping and maid service jobs here. At least they did until the economy here fell apart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2009, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Mesa, Az
21,144 posts, read 42,148,401 times
Reputation: 3861
Quote:
Originally Posted by krock1dk View Post
You are preaching to the choir! The real unemployment rate is at least twice as high as what is reported. I can tell you that Arizona also doesnt look at illegal immigrants. They make up a huge bulk of construction, landscaping and maid service jobs here. At least they did until the economy here fell apart.
Actually; our illegal aliens are down about 30-50% compared to 2 years ago...........and, still dwindling in numbers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2009, 01:43 AM
 
Location: Tucson, AZ 10/06/09
135 posts, read 516,069 times
Reputation: 87
Well compared to central Ohio, Dayton has lost GM's blazer plant, Delphi, NCR, Mead and a handful of other smaller subsidiaries to those big employers. Also the weather is just not to my liking any longer, muggy, humid, wet summers, weird winter weather, it rains, it freezes, it melts then freezes again then it snows a little to cover it all up. It'll be 30 degrees one day and 60 the next. At least when I lived in NH for 5 yrs you found out real fast what winter was. I'm ready for the change. Flip me over Myrtle I'm done on this side.............
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top