Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Anyway Ejay1 is just a "stubborn kid" that will not care anything but to "ARGUE". This kid will never care to any reason, to any source and to anyone that he doesn't like the face LOL. This kid will "DENY EVERYTHING" that he doesn't like it to be. Anyway Ejay1 I would like to buy "an ice cream" for you if you stop talk none sence and start to be reasonable with us LOL. How old are you kid? I know you like "ice cream" right? So stop argue with us and I will buy you one LOL.
Indosphere and Sinosphere are represent about the "culture influence" of countries in Asia. Those who are Sinosphere, are more influence by Han-Chinese culture. Those who are Indosphere, are more influence by Indian culture. Anyway the term Indosphere and Sinosphere are just represent only about "culture influence", but have nothing to do with speaking language and genetic/DNA of people. Also Mongolia and The Philipine aren't in any of these, because their culture didn't influence by neither Han-Chinese or Indian. Mongolia have their own culture and not related to Han-Chinese or Indian, and The Philipine is influenced by Spanish culture.
Tai-Kadai came from China much later than Austro-Asiatics (Cambodians) who were already there. So yes, you have the recent 14 million Chinese in Thailand, but you also have the majority Thai who came from China not too long ago (in the grand scheme of things)
Yes, Cambodian are the original people of Indo-China. On the time of 802-1431 Khmer empire was the greatest empire in Southeast Asia. They were "superior in culture" than any other race in Southeast Asia on that time. So they influenced other people those came later and "lake of culture" like Thai/Lao/Shan(Tai) people.
Thai/Lao/Shan(Tai) people start to move down from Southern of China at the same time of "Mongol investion of China". "The Immigration of Thai/Lao/Shan(Tai) people" and "Mongol investion of China" both events happened around 12-13th century, So "The Mongol investion of China" would explains, "WHY" Thai people have to move away from Southern of China.
For Vietnamese/Kinh people, they didn't originated in Southern of China and move down to Indo-China like Thai/Lao/Shan(Tai) . The origin of Viet/Kinh civilization is around "Red River Delta" that located in North of Vietnam. In the history Viet/Kinh have invaded and rules by Han-Chinese for over 1000 years, So that would explains of their Han-Chinese influence, by the way Vietnamese language is still considered as Austroasiatic language.
On the time of 802-1431 Khmer empire was the greatest empire in Southeast Asia. They were "superior in culture" than any other race in Southeast Asia on that time.
I disagree, maybe in Indochina countries. But 2 empires in maritime SEA were greater (7th-16th century). Cambodia even needed to pay tributes and a Cambodian king was even beheaded while the prince (Jayavarman II) was kidnapped.
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,043,908 times
Reputation: 11862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smtchll
Tai-Kadai came from China much later than Austro-Asiatics (Cambodians) who were already there. So yes, you have the recent 14 million Chinese in Thailand, but you also have the majority Thai who came from China not too long ago (in the grand scheme of things)
There was probably some local mixing, but overall the 'original Thai' are almost as Chinese as the later Chinese immigrants.
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,043,908 times
Reputation: 11862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nutapong
Yes, Cambodian are the original people of Indo-China. On the time of 802-1431 Khmer empire was the greatest empire in Southeast Asia. They were "superior in culture" than any other race in Southeast Asia on that time. So they influenced other people those came later and "lake of culture" like Thai/Lao/Shan(Tai) people.
Thai/Lao/Shan(Tai) people start to move down from Southern of China at the same time of "Mongol investion of China". "The Immigration of Thai/Lao/Shan(Tai) people" and "Mongol investion of China" both events happened around 12-13th century, So "The Mongol investion of China" would explains, "WHY" Thai people have to move away from Southern of China.
For Vietnamese/Kinh people, they didn't originated in Southern of China and move down to Indo-China like Thai/Lao/Shan(Tai) . The origin of Viet/Kinh civilization is around "Red River Delta" that located in North of Vietnam. In the history Viet/Kinh have invaded and rules by Han-Chinese for over 1000 years, So that would explains of their Han-Chinese influence, by the way Vietnamese language is still considered as Austroasiatic language.
Most of the original people of SEA were dark-skinned negritos. Cambodians probably also largely came from China.
The Viets also came from China, probably SE China. Those Mongoloid features are clearly adaptations to a colder climate. It's the same pattern of movement of people from north to south (there's an even more ancient reverse movement) across East Asia.
Tai-Kadai came from China much later than Austro-Asiatics (Cambodians) who were already there. So yes, you have the recent 14 million Chinese in Thailand, but you also have the majority Thai who came from China not too long ago (in the grand scheme of things)
news flash...the tai-kadai who inhabited southern china at the time werent as sino-looking as thai-chinese
in fact tai-kadai arent any more mongoloid lookng then austro-asiatics
btw Vietnamese are austroasiatic
Quote:
The Austro-Asiatic (Austroasiatic) languages, in recent classifications synonymous with Mon–Khmer, are a large language family of continental Southeast Asia, also scattered throughout India, Bangladesh, and the southern border of China. The name Austro-Asiatic comes from the Latin words for "south" and "Asia", hence "South Asia". Among these languages, only Khmer, Vietnamese, and Mon have a long-established recorded history, and only Vietnamese and Khmer have official status (in Vietnam and Cambodia,
owned austra boy.....the only people who didnt look mongoloid are the australoids and negritos who were present in SEAsia way before austroasiatics or austronesians...hence why tagalogs dont look very asian(both NEA or SEA)
basically, anyone that doesn't agreed with you are just a troll right? You are such pitiful.
no dumass....the link says those are aetas/negritos from pampanga...not visayan...
I dont try to trick and lie like you and your thai ladyboy friend does
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
