Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Asia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should Tibet be a free nation?
Yes 31 65.96%
No 10 21.28%
Not sure 6 12.77%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-02-2020, 08:37 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,195 posts, read 107,842,460 times
Reputation: 116097

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangerous-Boy View Post
yes


never trust a communist!
Never trust an entrenched theocratic system, nor a feudal one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-02-2020, 09:55 AM
 
14,993 posts, read 23,884,085 times
Reputation: 26523
I think the question is really - "should Tibet have the right of self-determination". Let Tibetans determine if they want independence. Now, naturally, they currently are not given that right by PRC. It's further complicated by the fact that many Tibetans live in exile - Nepal, India, and the U.S.
I think the Dali Lama had at one point petitioned for Tibet independence but is now saying he is for staying part of China as long as they have "cultural independence" i.e. less Chines control. This of course will never happen - Tibet is pretty much what East Germany was 50 years ago, it ain't Shanghai with cell phone and western stores, we are talking old-time hardcore commiebloc control - secret police, survellience, political prisoners...complete with PRC soldiers shooting Tibetans trying to cross the border into Nepal as if it was the Berlin Wall days.

Quote:
Originally Posted by munna21977 View Post
If people support Tibet to be a separate nation, then what about Puerto Rico or Hawaii ? Those regions are culturally different or not ? Map of world will change into thousands of countries if different culture aspect becomes a criteria for a separate nation.
What about them? Your assumptions are incorrect. Puerto Rico has been given the right to self-determination by the U.S. Their have been votes to determine future course for the residents of PR - independence, statehood, some other variation, and they have overwhelmingly chosen to remain part of the U.S. (statehood or commonwealth are still TBD). Any why not? I mean are you kidding? They are suckling on the teat of US dependence. You think they want to give up that? If anything it's the rest of the U.S. saying "please PR, become independent".

Hawaii is already a state and many from the lower 48 have moved in, along with a healthy population of Asians. Only 10% of the population is native Hawaiian. You do the math, you think they want independence (even if it was an option)?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2020, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Earth
7,643 posts, read 6,475,037 times
Reputation: 5828
Quote:
Originally Posted by munna21977 View Post
If people support Tibet to be a separate nation, then what about Puerto Rico or Hawaii ? Those regions are culturally different or not ? Map of world will change into thousands of countries if different culture aspect becomes a criteria for a separate nation.

Peurto Rico voted to become a state.


Hawaii would be annexed by China.



Quote:
Originally Posted by shanv3 View Post
Atleast for the sake of Mt.KangrinPoqe, yes. Its too much of a hassle to be harrassed by PLA soldiers everytime you try to go there.

Don't forget to free Mt. Kailash. Its sacrilege that its occupied by godless communists.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
Never trust an entrenched theocratic system, nor a feudal one.

Word. Bible thumpers and jihadists suck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2020, 11:16 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,127 posts, read 39,371,920 times
Reputation: 21217
It sort of depends on how it actually plays out. Its former government wasn't great. The other thing is that there's now a large Chinese population within Tibet. If there could be an amicable agreement, which is thus far pretty unlikely, then it would seem like a decent idea as would be an Uyghur nation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2020, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Earth
7,643 posts, read 6,475,037 times
Reputation: 5828
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
It sort of depends on how it actually plays out. Its former government wasn't great. The other thing is that there's now a large Chinese population within Tibet. If there could be an amicable agreement, which is thus far pretty unlikely, then it would seem like a decent idea as would be an Uyghur nation.



Lets be honest here. No one really cares about uyghurs. Instead of following Tengrism or buddhism, they turned their backs on paganism just to follow the foreign bedoiun ideology which hampers their independence movement because jihadists could easily hijack it. In a post 9/11 world, a communist looks better than a jihadist. Even their own muslim brothers don't care about them. Why isn't Pakistan, taliban, central asia, or hardcore shia Iranians launching jihad against the PRC? Hypocrites. every last of them.


It probably is a correct preventive measure by the CCP and PLA what they do to the uyghurs. But the CCP and PLA are just as evil. Have the barbarian fight the barbarian. its cheaper. Ancient chinese saying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2020, 04:49 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,127 posts, read 39,371,920 times
Reputation: 21217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangerous-Boy View Post
Lets be honest here. No one really cares about uyghurs. Instead of following Tengrism or buddhism, they turned their backs on paganism just to follow the foreign bedoiun ideology which hampers their independence movement because jihadists could easily hijack it. In a post 9/11 world, a communist looks better than a jihadist. Even their own muslim brothers don't care about them. Why isn't Pakistan, taliban, central asia, or hardcore shia Iranians launching jihad against the PRC? Hypocrites. every last of them.


It probably is a correct preventive measure by the CCP and PLA what they do to the uyghurs. But the CCP and PLA are just as evil. Have the barbarian fight the barbarian. its cheaper. Ancient chinese saying.
Nah, the crackdown just radicalizes people even more. It’s a terrible policy. So is arming the most radical wings of a religion, but that’s what ends up happening. Iran was for a split second a pretty open society with a Muslim society, but foreign intervention destroyed that. Similar things played out along with a specific strain of religious nuttery from Saudi Arabia that that nation was able to push with the oil wealth that we helped them build. I stayed with a friend’s family in Morocco and they showed me pictures of Morocco during a time several decades ago where the street scene was less conservative and we watched old Egyptian films where there was plenty of innuendo and bare shoulders compared to movies of that era from Western countries. The Muslim world became heavily radicalized and part of it was from the Cold War propping up and shutting down of what they thought was best. It’s not unreasonable to think that the draconian measures taken by China is sowing the seeds for a terrible blowback.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2020, 05:21 PM
 
5,462 posts, read 3,034,327 times
Reputation: 3271
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
Nah, the crackdown just radicalizes people even more. It’s a terrible policy. So is arming the most radical wings of a religion, but that’s what ends up happening. Iran was for a split second a pretty open society with a Muslim society, but foreign intervention destroyed that. Similar things played out along with a specific strain of religious nuttery from Saudi Arabia that that nation was able to push with the oil wealth that we helped them build. I stayed with a friend’s family in Morocco and they showed me pictures of Morocco during a time several decades ago where the street scene was less conservative and we watched old Egyptian films where there was plenty of innuendo and bare shoulders compared to movies of that era from Western countries. The Muslim world became heavily radicalized and part of it was from the Cold War propping up and shutting down of what they thought was best. It’s not unreasonable to think that the draconian measures taken by China is sowing the seeds for a terrible blowback.
Blowback may happen but will be crushed. Look what happened at Chechnya or dagestan. They got their freedom of religion and autonomy back, but they were destroyed first.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2020, 07:30 PM
 
5,428 posts, read 3,494,204 times
Reputation: 5031
Quote:
Originally Posted by shanv3 View Post
Wouldnt it be nice if they had only USA, Europe , Russia, China, India and Arabia/Africa?? They encompass pretty much every race and religion .
Only if you break the world down into simple parameters. In South-East Asia alone you've got countries like Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia that are quite distinct from one another and wouldn't fall under the umbrella term of China.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2020, 07:38 PM
 
6,340 posts, read 2,893,854 times
Reputation: 7273
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
It sort of depends on how it actually plays out. Its former government wasn't great. The other thing is that there's now a large Chinese population within Tibet..
Why is that? Because after China took over Tibet in 1950 they encouraged Chinese immigration into the region.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2020, 01:50 AM
 
Location: Siena,Tuscany,Italy
175 posts, read 93,584 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by munna21977 View Post
If people support Tibet to be a separate nation, then what about Puerto Rico or Hawaii ? Those regions are culturally different or not ? Map of world will change into thousands of countries if different culture aspect becomes a criteria for a separate nation.
Yeah,I agree with you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Asia

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top