Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Atheism and Agnosticism
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-10-2018, 03:52 AM
 
63,785 posts, read 40,053,123 times
Reputation: 7868

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
Probability says otherwise.
You need an in-depth course on probability theory because your shallow understanding of it and willingness to use it in situations where it is not appropriate underscore the shallowness of your learning.
Quote:
Question-begging is a fallacy.
You might want to engage in some study into fallacies as well because you seem not to have a clue how to apply them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-10-2018, 03:58 AM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,087 posts, read 20,700,397 times
Reputation: 5928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
People have been burnt at the stake for following the wrong atheism?
The Newport chapter of the International Atheist Conspiracy have rubbed a few out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticPhD View Post
You need an in-depth course on probability theory because your shallow understanding of it and willingness to use it in situations where it is not appropriate underscore the shallowness of your learning. You might want to engage in some study into fallacies as well because you seem not to have a clue how to apply them.
Mystic mate, it would do a lot of good if you could just step back and take a good look at the way you post.

Instead of explaining where he was wrong or at least where you disagreed or what was flawed about his thinking, you simply say that he is ignorant. This is your biggest fault - hubris and it does you no good at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2018, 04:21 AM
 
12,918 posts, read 16,857,522 times
Reputation: 5434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
No, I blame religion for what other people have suffered; and for what the religious are trying to do.



Go to the middle east and say there is no God. Wear a hard hat.
I would LOVE to see just how well the atheists of the world are able to get together on their own planet. Deciding who would have to do the work, while the rest could sit at a computer all day is only the first of the many issues that would slap them in the face. Something tells me that the numbers of wars would make earth look like a giant Mr Rogers Neighborhood in comparison. They would very quickly begin creating new religions on their own

I would rather live in a planet full of religious fundamentalists. I know the kind of people they are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2018, 04:23 AM
 
63,785 posts, read 40,053,123 times
Reputation: 7868
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSPONDER View Post
Mystic mate, it would do a lot of good if you could just step back and take a good look at the way you post.
Instead of explaining where he was wrong or at least where you disagreed or what was flawed about his thinking, you simply say that he is ignorant. This is your biggest fault - hubris and it does you no good at all.
It is the shallowness of his knowledge combined with the certainty he holds for his analyses that convinces me that he is not exactly an ideal target for such extensive re-instruction. I have found during my time here in the forums that the accusations of hubris, arrogance, condescension, superiority, etc. are virtually unavoidable. It is what it is and there is little that I can do about it. Everything in my view of life and our purpose for existing leads me to seek to promote as much love for one another as possible. I endeavor to present and defend my understanding of our purpose and to encourage others to adopt the same goal. BUT, I will respond to challenges to my understanding, especially when they exhibit so little understanding of the reasons for them. It doesn't alter my genuine desire to love each and every person I interact with but some make it a real challenge and I remain only human, Arq.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2018, 04:40 AM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,087 posts, read 20,700,397 times
Reputation: 5928
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticPhD View Post
It is the shallowness of his knowledge combined with the certainty he holds for his analyses that convinces me that he is not exactly an ideal target for such extensive re-instruction. I have found during my time here in the forums that the accusations of hubris, arrogance, condescension, superiority, etc. are virtually unavoidable. It is what it is and there is little that I can do about it. Everything in my view of life and our purpose for existing leads me to seek to promote as much love for one another as possible. I endeavor to present and defend my understanding of our purpose and to encourage others to adopt the same goal. BUT, I will respond to challenges to my understanding, especially when they exhibit so little understanding of the reasons for them. It doesn't alter my genuine desire to love each and every person I interact with but some make it a real challenge and I remain only human, Arq.
Some of here are experts; most are not. Experts are valuable of course, but it is an error to think that you must be an accredited expert to critique anything. The fact is that in the religion/Theism debate, even the experts are no more knowledgeable than the average layman when they get off their specialist subject. And such a far -ranging discussion gets off the Specialist Subject all the time.

What this means is that we turn to those who are experts for the conclusions and we do not have to be experts ourselves nor should we be. Furthermore, when one if arguing from a position of Faith, the epertise is routinely fiddled and manipulated to support the faith, and Authority is simply a cheat to bamboozle the unwary into accepting what they say without question.

You will be familiar with the Creationist ploy of trying to produce a string of 'scientists' to try to give Authority to their trash. This is a Ploy we need to be aware of, as well as the method of deceit by quotemining, whether in Print, post or in a video. What this means is that harry and all of us are well - justified in seeing a crock when it is presented and your stock ploy of saying they are not educated in the field is not a valid argument, even if it is anything more than one of your ploys - like suggesting that it is your duty to instruct people.

Mystic, you are the one who badly needs a course of re-education, but first you have to accept that you need it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2018, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,768 posts, read 4,974,055 times
Reputation: 2111
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticPhD View Post
You need an in-depth course on probability theory because your shallow understanding of it and willingness to use it in situations where it is not appropriate underscore the shallowness of your learning. You might want to engage in some study into fallacies as well because you seem not to have a clue how to apply them.
I hear a well spoken omega, nothing more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2018, 07:37 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,768 posts, read 4,974,055 times
Reputation: 2111
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyRules View Post
I would LOVE to see just how well the atheists of the world are able to get together on their own planet. Deciding who would have to do the work, while the rest could sit at a computer all day is only the first of the many issues that would slap them in the face. Something tells me that the numbers of wars would make earth look like a giant Mr Rogers Neighborhood in comparison. They would very quickly begin creating new religions on their own

I would rather live in a planet full of religious fundamentalists. I know the kind of people they are.
Strange, he is responding, but not to what I wrote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2018, 07:42 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,768 posts, read 4,974,055 times
Reputation: 2111
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticPhD View Post
It is the shallowness of his knowledge combined with the certainty he holds for his analyses that convinces me that he is not exactly an ideal target for such extensive re-instruction. I have found during my time here in the forums that the accusations of hubris, arrogance, condescension, superiority, etc. are virtually unavoidable. It is what it is and there is little that I can do about it. Everything in my view of life and our purpose for existing leads me to seek to promote as much love for one another as possible. I endeavor to present and defend my understanding of our purpose and to encourage others to adopt the same goal. BUT, I will respond to challenges to my understanding, especially when they exhibit so little understanding of the reasons for them. It doesn't alter my genuine desire to love each and every person I interact with but some make it a real challenge and I remain only human, Arq.
You said neurosurgeons were wrong. (The brain and parallel processing).
You said biochemists were wrong. (Exergonic chemical reactions).
You are defending About | Inspiring Philosophy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2018, 09:22 AM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,087 posts, read 20,700,397 times
Reputation: 5928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
You said neurosurgeons were wrong. (The brain and parallel processing).
You said biochemists were wrong. (Exergonic chemical reactions).
You are defending About | Inspiring Philosophy

Check out the link

"Our Mission

We love Jesus and spreading His message! We are a nonprofit Christian organization with the goal of spreading and defending the Gospel of Jesus Christ. We primarily do this in video form. We create videos to showcase a library of content that is creative and fun, yet will possess significant theological depth. This ministry intends to specialize in reaching the current generation, as well as future generations, with the power of digital video, social media, and whatever new technologies the future may bring
."

I have long been aware that "Philosophy" of this kind has as much to do with actual philosophy as "Creation Science" has to do with actual science.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2018, 11:13 AM
 
3,402 posts, read 2,787,155 times
Reputation: 1325
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyRules View Post
It seems like so many atheists are wanting to blame religion, or religious people, for the things they have suffered. A few short years ago, I was doing the same thing. All you have to do is look back at my religious posts. But now I'm saying that religion and religious belief are not the culprit.

Religion is just as much a victim as anyone. Religion is neutral. Religion and atheism are just reflections of human society.

It feels like maybe you are reading something into some posts, rather than what was said. I don't think religion is inherently bad, I do think it has some inherent dangers.



Religion does not make people behave badly, what it does is offer convenient and unquestionable justification of bad behavior for otherwise good people. It gives us a way to think of ourselves as good, moral, righteous people even when we treat others in bad and immoral ways. And it does so in a way that is almost impervious to argument. If I believe that my action is a command from God, or based on a deity's moral absolute, then any attempt to question it is itself an evil action.


Religion's danger is not that it is inherently bad, it is that it is inherently self justifying, and holds itself above reason, analysis, and discussion.


-NoCapo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Atheism and Agnosticism

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top