Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-26-2016, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Just outside of McDonough, Georgia
1,057 posts, read 1,130,796 times
Reputation: 1335

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsvh View Post
They both are dead. Neither is on the Senate agenda for a vote.
Yeah, I doublechecked, and MARTA has confirmed that the bills are dead. This is what I get for being optimistic about the General Assembly for once.

A few thoughts in light of this horrible news:

1) The General Assembly was not voting for an automatic tax increase. It's not like SB 330 was a unilateral tax increase; it wasn't. I would hope that state senators know that sales tax rates cannot be unilaterally raised by the General Assembly; voters must approve any sales tax increase. If this proposal had to die, I would rather it have been at the ballot box than in the General Assembly. I have a feeling that there wasn't GOP support because of the false belief that a vote in favor of SB 330 was a vote for increasing taxes....or maybe the GOP still doesn't trust MARTA, despite the agency's financial state and outlook. Does the GOP have such a contempt for voters that they won't allow them to have a say in whether or not to raise taxes? I would still have been gutted if the proposal fell at the ballot box, but at least the voters would have had their say.

2) Cosponsors matter, except when they don't. I should note that one of the cosponsors of SB 313 was Jeff Mullis, a Republican who is also the chair of a certain Rules Committee; it's likely that he also supports SB 330. According to the AJC, the bills died because they couldn't get on the Senate Calendar...which is set by the Rules Committee.

3) I need to find out who's running against John Albers, and donate to him or her. He needs to get out. I find it hard to believe that John Albers's solution to the traffic problem is to widen GA 400 (as if Forsyth and North Fulton will stop growing) and add BRT. Ironically, just this week I've seen both GRTA and GCT buses get stuck in express lane traffic.

4) It's highly likely that I won't be voting for Fran Millar if he runs for reelection. He was against both SB 313 and SB 330, but for the unrealistic reason that "the state should support MARTA financially instead of putting a greater burden on taxpayers." Sounds good, if the state DID support MARTA. I'm too much of a realist to accept the tripe that somehow, out of the goodness of their hearts, the General Assembly would start appropriating money for MARTA. Wasn't going to happen, and isn't going to happen for the foreseeable future.

5) DeKalb now has free reign to carry through with its "1% for roads and public safety" plan. Still not voting for it - I don't trust the county government enough - but at least it won't be out of spite: the General Assembly killed this proposal, not the county commission.

6) Where does MARTA go from here? Pardon my snap-back to pessimism, but I don't think ANY of the expansions are happening now, or at least not in the same form. GA 400 rail is all but dead (MARTA themselves confirmed it in that letter to the commission,) the Clifton Corridor LRT is dead if DeKalb goes through with its "1% for roads" threats, I-20 rail may be dead for the same reason. Without the sales tax increase at 0.5%, and short of a new president basically handing out money to transit systems nationwide, MARTA will have virtually nothing for expansion; TODs and existing MARTA funds will not be enough. 16 years may become 32 at this rate. However, traffic isn't getting any better, and businesses and (some) local governments will still want MARTA rail. What now? Wait until next year, and hope that off-year voter turnout won't be so pathetic that the proposal fails again?

7) On #6, the outstanding HB 1032 is also dead - it hasn't even gotten a committee vote yet. I like Rep. Taylor, and I think HB 1032 is a great bill, but I don't want HB 1032 to become the new HR 4: bills that sound awesome and amazing, but don't go anywhere. HB 1032 would be an absolute game changer in funding rail expansion anywhere in the state regardless of agency, but the bill won't even make it past Crossover Day. That bill would have had a greater impact, as MARTA, GRTA, any agency in the state would have been able to take advantage of it to build rail lines.

8) This is now the second time a major transit proposal has failed. The flawed T-SPLOST was killed by voters in 2012, and now this proposal was killed by the General Assembly. Atlanta is now 0-2 on voting for transit expansion...well, more like 0-1.5, as voters had nothing to do with this one.

Last edited by skbl17; 02-26-2016 at 04:24 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2016, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,262,857 times
Reputation: 7790
Georgia sucks, as always. Light years and decades behind the rest of the country, and the competition. No news there.

The only bright side to anything, I guess, is that the private sector and real estate development will keep doing their thing every year, and at least maybe, hopefully there will be more things to walk to at the existing MARTA stations and they'll be more useful. But the problem is that that's still useless, because nobody lives near the ridiculously few stations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Georgia
5,845 posts, read 6,157,618 times
Reputation: 3573
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0nyxStation View Post
The Sky is not falling. Atlanta Georgia will be just fine. Rail doesnt need to be extended. People need to move near rail if they want rail access. 37 Stations pick one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 06:55 PM
 
10,974 posts, read 10,875,645 times
Reputation: 3435
0nyxStation does have a point. If you want transit access, walkability, and density you need to make the move to live near it. This should be a clear signal to anyone considering to buy a place that values more than one commute option and avoiding traffic, don't buy in a distant suburb like Alpharetta or John's Creek. They will not provide you any options soon. Intown is your best choice now and tomorrow.



Quote:
Originally Posted by skbl17 View Post
8) This is now the second time a major transit proposal has failed. The flawed T-SPLOST was killed by voters in 2012, and now this proposal was killed by the General Assembly.
2012 TSPLOST should not count as a transit proposal. It was majority roads funding. I am a huge transit supporter and would vote against 2012 TSPOLOST against given the chance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 06:58 PM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,358 posts, read 6,527,927 times
Reputation: 5176
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsvh View Post
0nyxStation does have a point. If you want transit access, walkability, and density you need to make the move to live near it. This should be a clear signal to anyone considering to buy a place that values more than one commute option and avoiding traffic, don't buy in a distant suburb like Alpharetta or John's Creek. They will not provide you any options soon. Intown is your best choice now and tomorrow.
So only the very rich should be able to live near transit and/or their jobs in safe communities. Gotcha. Good plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 08:09 PM
 
10,974 posts, read 10,875,645 times
Reputation: 3435
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
So only the very rich should be able to live near transit and/or their jobs in safe communities. Gotcha. Good plan.
You think Alpharetta and John's Creek are a bastion of the poor? No. How about we get some rail transit along the west side Beltline corridor where the most transit dependant population in the metro is, then we consider subsidizing billions so some north side businessmen have cheap access to the airport.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 08:56 PM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,358 posts, read 6,527,927 times
Reputation: 5176
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsvh View Post
You think Alpharetta and John's Creek are a bastion of the poor? No. How about we get some rail transit along the west side Beltline corridor where the most transit dependant population in the metro is, then we consider subsidizing billions so some north side businessmen have cheap access to the airport.
No, but they can't exactly afford to just up and leave every time someone in the household gets a new job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 09:05 PM
 
10,974 posts, read 10,875,645 times
Reputation: 3435
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
No, but they can't exactly afford to just up and leave every time someone in the household gets a new job.
They can more so than someone on the west side.

1 in 6 americans move each year. The number one reason people move is access to jobs.

Better make that next move into the city!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 09:08 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
332 posts, read 344,355 times
Reputation: 287
Terrible news. And a major SIGH.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 09:18 PM
 
Location: Orange Blossom Trail
6,420 posts, read 6,524,727 times
Reputation: 2673
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsvh View Post
0nyxStation does have a point. If you want transit access, walkability, and density you need to make the move to live near it. This should be a clear signal to anyone considering to buy a place that values more than one commute option and avoiding traffic, don't buy in a distant suburb like Alpharetta or John's Creek. They will not provide you any options soon. Intown is your best choice now and tomorrow.





2012 TSPLOST should not count as a transit proposal. It was majority roads funding. I am a huge transit supporter and would vote against 2012 TSPOLOST against given the chance.
everything within 2 miles of a Marta rail station should be of high value, that land should be hard to come by and well developed. Marta has been here since what 1979 or 1980 something like that? I can't really speak about anything east of King Station, but the west and south lines? Too much wasted potential.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top