Atlanta mayoral race: Poll shows Mary Norwood with early lead (Buckhead: wealthy, affluent)

[arjay57]

Originally Posted by jsvh

Norwood's plan to prohibit large developments in "at risk" neighborhoods is the worst idea I have heard this election.

jsvh, not everybody is ready to unleash mega developers on fragile communities. Yes, they can gentrify and possibly increase the tax rolls, but a lot of folks will be marginalized, if not pushed out altogether. Norwood's suggestions to protect elderly homeowners and to focus on creating more affordable housing are worthy of serious consideration.

[magnetar]

Originally Posted by LovinDecatur

You continue to misinterpret her stand on this by taking the statement completely out of context.

The context really doesn't make it sound any better. The problem with the statement is that it doesn't define "at-risk," so potentially it could mean whatever Mary Norwood wanted it to mean. I'd need to hear a little bit more specificity about what "at-risk" means in this context to say I'd support such a notion.

But meanwhile, there are multiple other candidates that don't leave me with such serious questions.

[Iconographer]

Originally Posted by magnetar

The context really doesn't make it sound any better. The problem with the statement is that it doesn't define "at-risk," so potentially it could mean whatever Mary Norwood wanted it to mean. I'd need to hear a little bit more specificity about what "at-risk" means in this context to say I'd support such a notion.

But meanwhile, there are multiple other candidates that don't leave me with such serious questions.

Then maybe they should.

Caesar Mitchell:

We must send a strong message to developers that Atlanta and its people are not for sale! Development should not be encouraged at the expense of our residents.
While new development is a good indicator of a strong local economy and will always be welcomed in our city, As your mayor, I will put policies and practices in place to ensure that residents are not priced out of their neighborhoods and that everyone has the opportunity to benefit from city growth.

TOGETHER, WE WILL:

Implement inclusionary housing zones by requiring developers to set aside a percentage of housing that is affordable to people with low to moderate incomes
Revise the city’s Affordable Housing Policy to require residential developers receiving city grants or subsidies to increase their affordable housing levels
Place caps on annual property tax hikes in underserved communities to prevent residents from being priced out or displaced from their homes due to urban redevelopment
Partner with nonprofits and community-based organizations to keep housing at affordable rates for low and middle income families by creating rent control programs
Ensure that all of the city’s first-time homebuyer programs and resources are easily available and accessible to residents
Encourage homeownership by rewarding residents who have remained in their homes for over 10 years and experienced significant increases in property assessment

https://ceasarformayor.com

Keisha Lance-Bottoms:

In an effort to prevent the eviction of low-income property owners and small businesses due to the impact of gentrification in urban neighborhoods, Atlanta City Councilmember Keisha Lance Bottoms has introduced legislation requesting a report on establishing Displacement Free Zones in the city of Atlanta.
“While redevelopment is important for many of our underserved communities, it is equally important that we as a city establish inclusive means by which we are able to preserve the historic fabric of these neighborhoods, beginning with our residents and small business owners,” said Councilmember Bottoms. “Exploring the creation of Displacement Free Zones are yet another step in furthering the discussion on ways to combat the displacement of long-time property owners from the city.”

https://atlantadailyworld.com/2016/1...nt-free-zones/

Peter Aman:

Among other actions, I believe we must:

Expand efforts to bring jobs and job training to underserved neighborhoods throughout the City.
Reexamine city policies on zoning, housing and development. The city needs to be a partner, not an obstacle, to those who seek to invest in our neighborhoods. We must also work with developers so they act responsibly and in a manner consistent with the character of the neighborhood and the goals of the city overall (e.g., fairness, congestion mitigation, etc.).
Continue to expand the amount and improve the maintenance of greenspace such as the Atlanta BeltLine and possible Chattahoochee River Park and other park and recreation areas.
Fix the city’s streets and sidewalks. Even with a $250 million infrastructure bond project, Atlanta still has a $750 million backlog. As a city, we must commit to making these upgrades a priority.
Drive collaboration between various city and non-city agencies, the private sector, and philanthropic foundations to support revitalization while working with and keeping current residents in place.
Add and expand programs which incentivize and support affordable and entry-level housing.

https://peteraman.com/priorities/

I simply don't see any measurable difference on the positions of the leading candidates regarding this particular issue. Apparently terms like 'displacement-free zone', 'inclusionary housing zone' and 'rent control' merit no further investigation, but the term 'at-risk' does.
To me, it sounds like an excuse to dismiss Councilwoman Norwood for less exalted reasons.

[ronricks]

Originally Posted by arjay57

jsvh, not everybody is ready to unleash mega developers on fragile communities. Yes, they can gentrify and possibly increase the tax rolls, but a lot of folks will be marginalized, if not pushed out altogether. Norwood's suggestions to protect elderly homeowners and to focus on creating more affordable housing are worthy of serious consideration.

from the article posted a few pages back:

But he quickly notes that only about 8 percent of the people living in the west side neighborhoods are homeowners.

Renters are going to be marginalized in a situation like that it is unavoidable. Development isn't going to be stopped nor should it be.

[whodean]

Originally Posted by LovinDecatur

Then maybe they should.

Caesar Mitchell:


Keisha Lance-Bottoms:

Peter Aman:


https://peteraman.com/priorities/

I simply don't see any measurable difference on the positions of the leading candidates regarding this particular issue. Apparently terms like 'displacement-free zone', 'inclusionary housing zone' and 'rent control' merit no further investigation, but the term 'at-risk' does.
To me, it sounds like an excuse to dismiss Councilwoman Norwood for less exalted reasons.

It is an excuse.

All of the candidates pay lip service to "protecting citizens against displacement"

[cqholt]

Peter Aman:

Among other actions, I believe we must:

Expand efforts to bring jobs and job training to underserved neighborhoods throughout the City.
Reexamine city policies on zoning, housing and development. The city needs to be a partner, not an obstacle, to those who seek to invest in our neighborhoods. We must also work with developers so they act responsibly and in a manner consistent with the character of the neighborhood and the goals of the city overall (e.g., fairness, congestion mitigation, etc.).
Continue to expand the amount and improve the maintenance of greenspace such as the Atlanta BeltLine and possible Chattahoochee River Park and other park and recreation areas.
Fix the city’s streets and sidewalks. Even with a $250 million infrastructure bond project, Atlanta still has a $750 million backlog. As a city, we must commit to making these upgrades a priority.
Drive collaboration between various city and non-city agencies, the private sector, and philanthropic foundations to support revitalization while working with and keeping current residents in place.
Add and expand programs which incentivize and support affordable and entry-level housing.

Had a chance to listen and talk with Peter Amen last night at a community meet and greet. He is more than qualified to be our next mayor. I was very impressed with him and do not view him as having the same base as Mary Norwood, etc.

[Iconographer]

Originally Posted by cqholt

Had a chance to listen and talk with Peter Amen last night at a community meet and greet. He is more than qualified to be our next mayor. I was very impressed with him and do not view him as having the same base as Mary Norwood, etc.

I agree that Aman is an impressive candidate.
In what ways do you perceive their bases to be different?

[jeoff]

Originally Posted by cqholt

Had a chance to listen and talk with Peter Amen last night at a community meet and greet. He is more than qualified to be our next mayor. I was very impressed with him and do not view him as having the same base as Mary Norwood, etc.

He may not have the same beliefs or qualifications, but I think their bases strongly overlap.

If you go by yard signs, it seems that they are strong in the same areas.

And, if Norwood withdrew from the race tomorrow, who do you think it would benefit the most? Where do you think that all of her support in Buckhead would run to?—especially if they thought he had a chance at winning?

[Forhall]

I like Norwood and Aman. Haven't decided who to vote for initially. My main issue is that I don't want to vote for anyone against gentrification and continued development. As soon as this city goes "stale" for new development, population growth will slow and even reverse. The continued change and growth is what makes Atlanta so exciting for so many people. I don't want to vote for anyone stopping that.

Who would be the best candidate for those goals?

[Gulch]

Originally Posted by Forhall

I like Norwood and Aman. Haven't decided who to vote for initially. My main issue is that I don't want to vote for anyone against gentrification and continued development. As soon as this city goes "stale" for new development, population growth will slow and even reverse. The continued change and growth is what makes Atlanta so exciting for so many people. I don't want to vote for anyone stopping that.

Who would be the best candidate for those goals?

Vincent Fort, duh.

/s