Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-25-2011, 07:23 PM
 
Location: central Austin
7,228 posts, read 16,109,315 times
Reputation: 3915

Advertisements

The costs are just too high! Eventually, water availability rather than warm weather with constant AC will push people back into the old river cities.

We may not live to see it (think of native Austinites in their 80s who can't believe how the town has grown) but in 100 years abundant water will have revitalized places like Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Memphis, Louisville, St. Louis. etc.

You can count on it because the costs of moving people -- even entire cities -- is less than moving water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2011, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,429 posts, read 46,607,911 times
Reputation: 19574
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson View Post
Mikey65, it's good to see that I am not crazy, because I have been saying this for YEARS. This country needs to install a network of viaducts that are capable of pumping water from areas that are flooding into areas that are drought stricken. It's not rocket science. Ancient Rome had these viaducts! If ancient Rome can do it, why can't we?

This, coupled with a comprehensive rainwater harvesting program would provide more than enough water for everybody!

Great minds think alike, I guess.

20yrsinBranson
Absolutely not! The Great Lakes have joined together to form an agreement to prevent this potential type of idiocy from happening. The semi-arid West will just have to accept limited resources and adapt better water management policies to reflect that they do not have available water like the East.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2011, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Holly Neighborhood, Austin, Texas
3,981 posts, read 6,739,779 times
Reputation: 2882
Quote:
Originally Posted by love roses View Post
Or buy your rice from another State, keep it in the USA
I prefer to buy US Ag too for various reasons, but when Texmati is twice the price as Indian Basmati I have to take the more economic route. But the price difference also makes me think that we don't have the ideal conditions for rice production or in other words you can subsidize something to death to make a product but those dollars are probably better spent elsewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2011, 11:32 AM
 
7,742 posts, read 15,134,243 times
Reputation: 4295
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson View Post
Mikey65, it's good to see that I am not crazy, because I have been saying this for YEARS. This country needs to install a network of viaducts that are capable of pumping water from areas that are flooding into areas that are drought stricken. It's not rocket science. Ancient Rome had these viaducts! If ancient Rome can do it, why can't we?

This, coupled with a comprehensive rainwater harvesting program would provide more than enough water for everybody!

Great minds think alike, I guess.

20yrsinBranson
The issue is how do you do it in a way that makes it cost effective. The times you need it are few and far between and I bet dont even come close to justifying the cost.

The real limiting factor is energy. Once we have unlimited cheap energy we can purify our waste water. It isnt that we dont have enough water we dont have enough drinkable water.

For example we could purify our waste water and dump it right back into lake travis for holding purposes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2011, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
16,787 posts, read 49,083,166 times
Reputation: 9478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin97 View Post
The issue is how do you do it in a way that makes it cost effective. The times you need it are few and far between and I bet dont even come close to justifying the cost.

The real limiting factor is energy. Once we have unlimited cheap energy we can purify our waste water. It isnt that we dont have enough water we dont have enough drinkable water.

For example we could purify our waste water and dump it right back into lake travis for holding purposes.
We are currently purifying our wastewater and dumping most of it into the Colorado River downstream of Austin. Some of our wastewater is being reused in area industrial plants and for watering golf courses. Other municipalities downstream of Austin are using Colorado River water, including our wastewater, in their municipal water supplies, where it is further filtered before reuse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2011, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Austin
1,774 posts, read 3,795,973 times
Reputation: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraniteStater View Post
Absolutely not! The Great Lakes have joined together to form an agreement to prevent this potential type of idiocy from happening. The semi-arid West will just have to accept limited resources and adapt better water management policies to reflect that they do not have available water like the East.
As we have always accepted, I might add. No one has encroached on your (I'm guessing it is yours) water rights. However, those new to the area may have to adjust the same way that Texans always have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2011, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,650,196 times
Reputation: 8617
Quote:
we don't have the ideal conditions for rice production
Correct, we pay our workers way too much compared to the foreign rice workers, very non-ideal for rice production .

As for piping and redistributing water, that is almost never a good idea, especially across long-distance and different ecological regions. The 'excess' water (from our perspective) is almost never 'excess' to the ecological system downstream - it is usually part of a natural cycle. The massive water movement in the west from the mountains to the coast is hopefully the last large-scale water project we every see.

Desalination is viable, but expensive - both for operation and transport; however, it could be done, especially if the power was generated from, say, wind or wave power. Water could be desalinated on an 'as available' power basis and pumped to the lakes for storage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2011, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Holly Neighborhood, Austin, Texas
3,981 posts, read 6,739,779 times
Reputation: 2882
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
Correct, we pay our workers way too much compared to the foreign rice workers, very non-ideal for rice production .

As for piping and redistributing water, that is almost never a good idea, especially across long-distance and different ecological regions. The 'excess' water (from our perspective) is almost never 'excess' to the ecological system downstream - it is usually part of a natural cycle. The massive water movement in the west from the mountains to the coast is hopefully the last large-scale water project we every see.

Desalination is viable, but expensive - both for operation and transport; however, it could be done, especially if the power was generated from, say, wind or wave power. Water could be desalinated on an 'as available' power basis and pumped to the lakes for storage.
Well if US workers are more productive with their bigger salaries it will still be economically viable to do here, but this is the case for all industries in the developed world when it competes against the lower salaries in the undeveloped world.

And yes deslalination of ocean water is very expensive and requires a lot of energy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2011, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
16,787 posts, read 49,083,166 times
Reputation: 9478
Even though its not raining in Austin yet, its nice to see some rain today in the Colorado River watershed.

Attached Thumbnails
Lake Travis is 61% Empty - Austin Water Supply Alternatives-rain.jpg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2011, 05:02 PM
 
Location: central Austin
7,228 posts, read 16,109,315 times
Reputation: 3915
yes, that is just what my kids say when the showers miss us: "at least someplace in Texas got some rain!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top