Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-01-2020, 06:18 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,642,308 times
Reputation: 8617

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by afterdark80 View Post
Thanks. This is exactly what I looked at when making my argument with the delusional one.
You didn't look very hard, since I posted that a few posts before you posted
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-01-2020, 06:59 AM
 
150 posts, read 134,262 times
Reputation: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
You didn't look very hard, since I posted that a few posts before you posted

Didn't need to look, found the facts that validated my comments on my own before I posted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2020, 02:35 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
13,448 posts, read 15,484,806 times
Reputation: 18997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
The privately held companies make a profit for every kW they sell, so they encourage people to use as much as they can. They 'lure' you with the lower $/kW and sometimes offer 'gift cards' or rebates for exceeding certain thresholds. The generation and transmission costs for AE are essentially intertwined, but it is still a substantial cost. The breakdown for AE (generation and delivery) is not really analogous to the breakdown on the bills you will see. The cities want to minimize use so they do not have to build another power plant.

With your set-up, your usage does not really look out of line, I guess. Larger users (2,000 kW+, maybe?) typically do better on deregulated utilities where they do not incentivize conservation.
I don't feel like we really use that much power but I guess we do..the meter doesn't lie most of the time. Truth is the house is big, there's no added insulation or anything beyond whatever was required in '89, we added a new roof but I'm not sure if that makes a difference... the pool is a major power consumer and we just weren't going to spend the money to upgrade to an "energy efficient" pool pump..but the onerous ONCOR charges are what bolster our bills, not really usage. That is why the provider per kwh thing only saves you a couple of dollars really, so we don't fall for the lures... We use Reliant energy, they've been pretty good..we used to get bills of 400-500 when we were with TXU. now we change providers like hats and end up keeping our bills to a manageable level. You're correct in that deregulated ville, energy conservation is not incentivized.

I just don't believe that Austin's codes thirty one years ago was vastly different than Wilco's. Our home was built pretty well. So I don't know why Austin power consumption is lower other than individuals actually making an effort to not consume a lot of power. Maybe it's the punative means (tiers), I don't know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2020, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,642,308 times
Reputation: 8617
Quote:
Originally Posted by riaelise View Post
[...]

I just don't believe that Austin's codes thirty one years ago was vastly different than Wilco's. Our home was built pretty well. So I don't know why Austin power consumption is lower other than individuals actually making an effort to not consume a lot of power. Maybe it's the punative means (tiers), I don't know.
The COA required higher energy efficiency construction standards for a long time; houses constructed outside any municipality (not just Austin) often are significantly lower in overall energy efficiency for a same-era construction. In addition, many of the older homes were upgraded via AE incentives (appliances, insultation, weatherstripping, etc).

Of course, Austin does have a lot of apartments to help offset the larger SFH and that does help as well in the numbers game.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2020, 04:37 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,744,889 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
The COA required higher energy efficiency construction standards for a long time; houses constructed outside any municipality (not just Austin) often are significantly lower in overall energy efficiency for a same-era construction.
And many outside a municipality are significantly higher in overall energy efficiency.

Millions of us have invested in energy efficiency WITHOUT the government telling us to do so because it makes financial sense.

My guess is that houses in the Austin suburbs are MORE energy efficient than in the city since on average they are much newer.

"The median age of Austin real estate is 30 years old"

Moderator cut: link removed, competitor site

Last edited by Yac; 10-07-2020 at 12:15 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2020, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,642,308 times
Reputation: 8617
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
And many outside a municipality are significantly higher in overall energy efficiency.
Some, maybe, but not most. Anyway, the per sq ft energy efficiency inside the COA was about 15 percent higher than in non-municipal areas some 10 years ago or so. That was across the board regardless of house age. Not sure if it is still the case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:08 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top