Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Australia and New Zealand
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-02-2018, 09:53 PM
 
991 posts, read 1,771,874 times
Reputation: 660

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PacoMartin View Post
I was simply trying to be complete in listing short routes that could easily be handled by smaller jets.

But if you insist. These routes to Sydney are flown with an A380.
Many of those routes are flown as flagship routes and many are run at a loss (MAS for one runs at a significant loss using the 388). The main issue is filling those seats for QF when there are already an abundance of seats on those routes. The O/D traffic or connecting traffic is really only SYD-SIN, SYD-HKG and MEL-SIN. The MEL-HKG route really doesn't support a 388 for QF outside of two or three months a year. They also have VA running that route on a 332 along with CX (which is a QF partner). Separately, there is competition on similar routings through HU and CZ.

And although they currently don't QF has been looking at running their LCC subsidiary JQ into HKG. Probably less of attractive now as they have shutdown JQ Asia out of HKG.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-02-2018, 10:02 PM
 
4,235 posts, read 4,904,587 times
Reputation: 3965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugget View Post
Many of those routes are flown as flagship routes and many are run at a loss (MAS for one runs at a significant loss using the 388).
You just have to look at the order book to see that the 388 has not been a commercial success with airlines. If it wasn't for EK, Airbus would have had a disaster on its hands with the 388. Almost half the delivered 388's have gone to EK. It's hard to see it lasting past the next decade.

MAS has always struggled to make the leap into the realm of the big Asian carriers (2014 didn't help), and KUL has always struggled to compete with HKG and SIN as a business traveller hub.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2018, 11:03 PM
 
991 posts, read 1,771,874 times
Reputation: 660
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCC_1 View Post
KUL has always struggled to compete with HKG and SIN as a business traveller hub.
That's because it isn't a business hub, as much as others have tried the main business hubs are still SIN and HKG. CZ is trying to make a hub out of CAN and MU is trying out of PVG but neither are competing with SIN and HKG.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2018, 12:05 AM
 
4,235 posts, read 4,904,587 times
Reputation: 3965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugget View Post
That's because it isn't a business hub, as much as others have tried the main business hubs are still SIN and HKG.
Doha and Abu Dhabi aren't international commercial centres, but they've managed to nut out a decent transit business even with EK on their doorstep.

CZ and MU have decent seats. The rest of the experience is pretty awful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2018, 12:17 AM
 
991 posts, read 1,771,874 times
Reputation: 660
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCC_1 View Post
Doha and Abu Dhabi aren't international commercial centres, but they've managed to nut out a decent transit business even with EK on their doorstep.
Yeah but if you're connecting from Europe are you really going to fly the 13 hours to KUL and then take a short hop to your final destination or just do it directly.

For the Oz trip it's more of a case that there are only so many bums that need to go to Oz. Plenty have tried and even they have pulled out of the Oz caper preferring to fly into an Asian hub and then let anybody who needs to connect from there. BA, KL, AL have all pulled out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2018, 12:27 AM
 
4,235 posts, read 4,904,587 times
Reputation: 3965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugget View Post
Yeah but if you're connecting from Europe are you really going to fly the 13 hours to KUL and then take a short hop to your final destination or just do it directly.
It depends where I'm going. Would I take a CX/SQ flight and then connect to CAN rather than a direct CZ flight? Absolutely.

What I don't understand is why anyone flying from Europe to Asia would opt to transit in the ME. You end up with two six hour flights and no sleep. Awful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2018, 01:06 AM
 
991 posts, read 1,771,874 times
Reputation: 660
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCC_1 View Post
It depends where I'm going. Would I take a CX/SQ flight and then connect to CAN rather than a direct CZ flight? Absolutely.

What I don't understand is why anyone flying from Europe to Asia would opt to transit in the ME. You end up with two six hour flights and no sleep. Awful.
Yeah you would on CX/SQ but would you on MH (even pre 2014)?

I've never understood the hype around the ME3, yes they have new planes and hard product but it's never been cheap enough to be attractive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2018, 01:17 AM
 
14,611 posts, read 17,617,582 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugget View Post
Many of those routes are flown as flagship routes and many are run at a loss (MAS for one runs at a significant loss using the 388). The main issue is filling those seats for QF when there are already an abundance of seats on those routes.
Which kind of makes you wonder if Qantas should be operating the A380 at all.

The US flagged carriers ordered 70% of their B747s before airline deregulation in 1978. ETOPS-120 first flight was in 1985, and ETOPS-180 first flight was in 1989. The last 4 engine jet orders by US flagged airlines were placed in 1985 by United and Northwest. These B747s were just retired in 2017.

Qantas placed their biggest B747 order in 1987, which is still somewhat understandable as ETOPS-180 was not approved. But the airline never ordered a single B777. For nearly two decades between 02-Mar-1987 and 30-Mar-2006 Qantas only ordered 6 wide body jets from Boeing (B747s).


747-100 PW 03-Oct-1966 22
747-200 PW 07-Nov-1985 2
747-400 PW 07-Nov-1985 44
747 Total 68 United

777-200 PW 15-Oct-1990 22
777-200ER GE 12-May-1993 20
777-200ER PW 01-Apr-1993 38
777-300ER GE 23-Apr-2015 18
777 Total 98 United

747-200 PW 02-Nov-1967 16
747-200 PW 30-Jul-1976 1
747-200 RR 07-Feb-1979 2
747-200 RR 07-Feb-1979 3
747-100 RR 16-Jan-1980 2
747-300 RR 07-Sep-1983 6
747-400 RR 02-Mar-1987 21
747-400ER GE 19-Dec-2000 6
747 Total 57 Qantas
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2018, 01:46 AM
 
4,235 posts, read 4,904,587 times
Reputation: 3965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugget View Post
Yeah you would on CX/SQ but would you on MH (even pre 2014)?
Truthfully, between MH and CZ, yes I would, unless I had time constraints. (All else being equal, I'd be on SQ or CX)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugget View Post
I've never understood the hype around the ME3, yes they have new planes and hard product but it's never been cheap enough to be attractive.
I agree. I also don't like the flight segments between Oz and Europe. They've done a pretty good job of convincing the public that they're some sort of six star resort in the air.

Last edited by BCC_1; 04-03-2018 at 02:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2018, 07:35 AM
 
14,611 posts, read 17,617,582 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by PacoMartin View Post
Qantas placed their biggest B747 order in 1987, which is still somewhat understandable as ETOPS-180 was not approved. But the airline never ordered a single B777. For nearly two decades between 02-Mar-1987 and 30-Mar-2006 Qantas only ordered 6 wide body jets from Boeing (B747s).

747-200 PW 02-Nov-1967 16
747-200 PW 30-Jul-1976 1
747-200 RR 07-Feb-1979 2
747-200 RR 07-Feb-1979 3
747-100 RR 16-Jan-1980 2
747-300 RR 07-Sep-1983 6
747-400 RR 02-Mar-1987 21
747-400ER GE 19-Dec-2000 6
747 Total 57 Qantas
Singapore Airlines, like the US flagged airlines, also ordered their last B747s in the mid 1980s, and began ordering B777s in the 1990's.

747-200 PW 26-Jul-1972 19
747-300 PW 15-Dec-1981 11
747-300 PW 31-May-1983 3
747-400 PW 27-Mar-1986 42
747-200 PW 20-Aug-1987 1
747-400F PW 16-Jan-1990 17
747 Total 93 Singapore Airlines

777-200ER RR 22-Dec-1995 46
777-300 RR 22-Dec-1995 12
777-300ER GE 29-May-2001 27
777X GE 19-Jun-2017 20
777 Total 105 Singapore Airlines

One analyst calculated that Qantas pi$$ed away over a billion dollars in unnecessary fuel costs by rejecting the B777

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCC_1 View Post
What I don't understand is why anyone flying from Europe to Asia would opt to transit in the ME. You end up with two six hour flights and no sleep. Awful.
One segment is over twice the length of the other segment.

Still, perhaps your sentiment is widely shared and Qantas will keep adding connecting flights from other cities through Perth.

Last edited by PacoMartin; 04-03-2018 at 08:04 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Australia and New Zealand

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top