Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-30-2010, 11:03 AM
 
10,926 posts, read 21,997,495 times
Reputation: 10569

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankgn87 View Post
that is not what I said... I said.. A faster a car is.. the more it costs. And that is 100% correct.
Not true either, again, 2011 Mustang GT, faster than the Challenger, and cheaper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-30-2010, 11:48 AM
 
3,042 posts, read 5,001,639 times
Reputation: 3324
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHDave View Post
Todays V6's can provide a good compromise, look at the 2011 Mustang, 305 horses and 31mpg highway, 0-60 in 5.1 seconds. Hell my '07 Charger V6 has 250 HP (a bit more with my predator tuner) and I get 23/29mpg, not sure what the 0-60 is on it with the tuner, stock is around 7.5 I think, but it weighs almost 2 tons.
That's my point. It's nice to know that a car gets good mileage, and at the same time is a little peppier than a 1980 Mercedes 240D. So it's ludicrous to suggest that one must either pick an econobox or a dedicated sports car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Pikesville, MD
5,228 posts, read 15,292,248 times
Reputation: 4846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
^^ Oh and as for rarity... I think there were only about 4,000 made, mostly for the 1984 model year. A few hit the lots as 1983 models late in the model year cycle, then the rest came out as 1984s.

There were non SVO Mustang turbos from '79-84. I had an '80 Mustang Cobra turbo that I swapped a 460 cid big block into:








Quote:
Originally Posted by frankgn87 View Post
that is not what I said... I said.. A faster a car is.. the more it costs. And that is 100% correct.
No, it's not. It's often correct, but not anywhere near 100%. Even if you limit the conversation to new cars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 02:05 PM
 
Location: South Jersey
7,780 posts, read 21,880,174 times
Reputation: 2355
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHDave View Post
Not true either, again, 2011 Mustang GT, faster than the Challenger, and cheaper.
that may be one example but if you want to keep going faster, its going to cost you more $$. The price of cars does NOT go down the faster they are.. Name me the 10 fastest cars you can buy... Then name the prices.. God.. why are some people so thick headed to the obvious??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 02:09 PM
 
10,926 posts, read 21,997,495 times
Reputation: 10569
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankgn87 View Post
that may be one example but if you want to keep going faster, its going to cost you more $$. The price of cars does NOT go down the faster they are.. Name me the 10 fastest cars you can buy... Then name the prices.. God.. why are some people so thick headed to the obvious??
It's the only example I need to provide to prove that your statement was pure BS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 02:09 PM
 
Location: South Jersey
7,780 posts, read 21,880,174 times
Reputation: 2355
take any car.. old or new.. Run it in the quarter mile... Then make it faster.. Then look at your wallet.. Why is this so hard to comprehend? speed cost $$.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Merc63 View Post
There were non SVO Mustang turbos from '79-84. I had an '80 Mustang Cobra turbo that I swapped a 460 cid big block into:










No, it's not. It's often correct, but not anywhere near 100%. Even if you limit the conversation to new cars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 02:22 PM
 
10,926 posts, read 21,997,495 times
Reputation: 10569
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankgn87 View Post
take any car.. old or new.. Run it in the quarter mile... Then make it faster.. Then look at your wallet.. Why is this so hard to comprehend? speed cost $$.
The problem is in your wording "A faster a car is.. the more it costs" can be taken in relation to purchasing a car, which is not the case. If you had said the faster you want a given car to go the more it costs, there would have been much less confusion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,319,643 times
Reputation: 5480
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHDave View Post
The problem is in your wording "A faster a car is.. the more it costs" can be taken in relation to purchasing a car, which is not the case. If you had said the faster you want a given car to go the more it costs, there would have been much less confusion.
that is kinda true to make a Fox body mustang or 3rd gen Iroc Camaro perform as well as a brand new stock 2011 5.0 mustng GT or Camaro SS will take alot of $$$ and it would almost be cheaper to buy the brand new car and the added factory warranty is a bounus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Pikesville, MD
5,228 posts, read 15,292,248 times
Reputation: 4846
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankgn87 View Post
take any car.. old or new.. Run it in the quarter mile... Then make it faster.. Then look at your wallet.. Why is this so hard to comprehend? speed cost $$.
Take any car, compare it to a faster car, Is it ALWAYS more expensive? No.

My V8 RX7 was faster than a new Hyundai exel. Was it more expensive than teh Hyndai? No. Why is this so hard to comprehend?

Your statement was not "to make any car faster it will cost more." Your statement was "a faster car will cost more" and that's NOT true. I can have a lot of cars that are faster, but less expensive that a lot of cars that are slower but costlier.

And actually, there are also small things you can do to a lot of cars that wil make them faster without costing a single penny. So even then, your claim is not 100% true. Yes, it will cost more money to make any car significantly faster than it already is. But that's NOT what you said in your actual words posted. Until now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,185,348 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merc63 View Post
There were non SVO Mustang turbos from '79-84.
The higher-horsepower GT Turbo wasn't available until 1983.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top