Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2020, 12:53 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamweasel View Post
Consumer Reports is an awful publication when it comes to vehicles. Their data does not correlate to anything in the real world. They use a statistically insignificant sample size and mix-in "predictions" and "rules" largely based on a bunch of BS to rip-off customers who pay for their data. It's a sham organization. (At least when it comes to cars where I have personal experience with them. I have no clue if they operate their other divisions in the same manner.)

Then they offer nuggets like this buried in their press release: "Consumer Reports said only models that come standard with forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking with pedestrian detection were considered for the top picks list." HUH?

So just because it may be an option on some cars you penalize them for that??? And what does whether or not this feature is offered have to do with a vehicle's reliability, anyway? (It doesn't!) CR always has these arbitrary non-quality related things they like to plug into their "predicted reliability" equations for some reason.



I don't read it and have no idea of current methods but whenever someone would bring up CR a guy I used to work with would make the point they once tested an under dash 45 rpm record player (yeah, it was an old report) and knocked it because it wouldn't play upside down. I guess a good thing to keep in mind should you insist on music while rolling your vehicle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2020, 01:22 PM
 
6,073 posts, read 4,753,297 times
Reputation: 2635
Quote:
Originally Posted by OutdoorLover View Post
That rant doesn't deserve a point-by-point, but it's just straight up false.
no need for a "point by point" breakdown. I would be happy for you to point out a single thing that is false. consumer reports is the NPR of the automotive world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2020, 02:06 PM
 
11,177 posts, read 16,021,941 times
Reputation: 29935
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
I don't read it and have no idea of current methods but whenever someone would bring up CR a guy I used to work with would make the point they once tested an under dash 45 rpm record player (yeah, it was an old report) and knocked it because it wouldn't play upside down. I guess a good thing to keep in mind should you insist on music while rolling your vehicle.
As with most of the complaints against CR in this thread, that one is laughably false. Here's what CR actually wrote regarding the few cars that had record players back in the day.

https://www.consumerreports.org/cro/...-60s/index.htm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2020, 06:01 PM
 
7,494 posts, read 7,179,877 times
Reputation: 2780
Yes, looks that way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by plmbpmp View Post
Mini ahead of Honda? Really?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2020, 06:04 PM
 
7,494 posts, read 7,179,877 times
Reputation: 2780
Thank You!




Quote:
Originally Posted by OutdoorLover View Post
That rant doesn't deserve a point-by-point, but it's just straight up false.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2020, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Newburyport, MA
12,441 posts, read 9,540,640 times
Reputation: 15907
Quote:
Originally Posted by GearHeadDave View Post
Actually you don't concur with their findings on Honda, 17th in this CR list and Acura is 24. They have been extremely reliable for me, which immediately has to make you wonder about these new CR rankings, especially with several German cars in the top 10. Or as another poster noted, maybe the range of variance in quality is decreasing so that these rankings become less useful. In other words, this ranking is not as important as it once was in the deciding fator on choosing a car, as all the OEMs have improved?
That ranking isn't a reliability ranking, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2020, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Lee County, NC
3,319 posts, read 2,340,554 times
Reputation: 4383
Quote:
Originally Posted by V8 Vega View Post
I noticed American cars are at the bottom of that list.
Consumer Reports are concerned about safety, reliability, I keep that in mind when I read their reports
The bottom two spots are Fiat and Mitsubishi.

The brands not shown in the OPs image:

27: Alfa Romeo
28: Jaguar
29: Cadillac
30: Land Rover
31: Jeep
32: Mitsubishi
33: Fiat

Ram trucks is not listed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2020, 06:48 PM
 
Location: Newburyport, MA
12,441 posts, read 9,540,640 times
Reputation: 15907
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadManofBethesda View Post
As with most of the complaints against CR in this thread, that one is laughably false. Here's what CR actually wrote regarding the few cars that had record players back in the day.

https://www.consumerreports.org/cro/...-60s/index.htm
Listening to the many strange and wild accusations, I am reminded of some dialogue from the Three Stooges...

Curly: "You know I'm temperamental."

Moe: "Yeah, 95% temper, 5% mental."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2020, 10:22 PM
 
6,073 posts, read 4,753,297 times
Reputation: 2635
Quote:
Originally Posted by movin2Reston View Post
Thank You!

I'd thank them, but they ran away when I called their bluff. consumer reports is a rag, and has been recognized as one for years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2020, 01:55 AM
 
Location: White House, TN
6,486 posts, read 6,186,539 times
Reputation: 4584
Wow if Honda's 15th out of 33 then most makers are making some pretty dang good cars. Personally I think Honda should be ahead of some of those.

Nobody dislikes the current generation Accord. It might be having some problems with the turbo engines, but the design itself is top notch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top