Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2010, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,389,847 times
Reputation: 1802

Advertisements

Are those opposed to Sebastopol's proposed smoking ban also against the ban on smoking in restaurants\ stores\ hospitals? Would anyone want to be sitting at a lunch counter next to someone who is smoking a cigar or marijuana? How about allowing people to spit in the air in restaurants or fart and comb lice out of their hair while sitting next to other customers?

Why don't we do away with speed limits or allow people to burn trash on their front yards?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2010, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Portlandia "burbs"
10,229 posts, read 16,301,087 times
Reputation: 26005
I think bars should have been given the option of being all-smoking OR all-non-smoking instead of the Nazi-like Prohibition. Perhaps apartments should have the same option ~ all-smoking or all-non-smoking. Those with more than one building could even reserve one just for smokers. Too much to ask?

As for freedom to smoke inside one's own home. . .

Wasn't in California somewhere that a smoker got cited by the police for smoking on her own front porch just because a neighbor "didn't like it"??? I wish I can remember that story but it's been at least a year ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,389,847 times
Reputation: 1802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesmama View Post
I think bars should have been given the option of being all-smoking OR all-non-smoking instead of the Nazi-like Prohibition. Perhaps apartments should have the same option ~ all-smoking or all-non-smoking. Those with more than one building could even reserve one just for smokers. Too much to ask?

As for freedom to smoke inside one's own home. . .

Wasn't in California somewhere that a smoker got cited by the police for smoking on her own front porch just because a neighbor "didn't like it"??? I wish I can remember that story but it's been at least a year ago.
Since we know that second-hand smoke is unhealthy and can result in cancer, why would anyone want to breath in another person nasty tobacco smoke? California was the first state to forbid smoking in public establishments and now most state have the same restrictions. Does Oregon allow smoking in restaurants?

If you wanted to pee on the floor of a restaurant because it is too inconvenient to walk to the restroom would that be OK for others around you? What does "Nazi" mean when it comes to the well-being of others?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Portlandia "burbs"
10,229 posts, read 16,301,087 times
Reputation: 26005
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
Since we know that second-hand smoke is unhealthy and can result in cancer, why would anyone want to breath in another person nasty tobacco smoke? California was the first state to forbid smoking in public establishments and now most state have the same restrictions. Does Oregon allow smoking in restaurants?

If you wanted to pee on the floor of a restaurant because it is too inconvenient to walk to the restroom would that be OK for others around you? What does "Nazi" mean when it comes to the well-being of others?
Smoking is banned in ALL bars and restaurants in Oregon. And I adhere to my belief that establishments should be allowed to choose between ALL smoking or ALL non-smoking. And, yes, Nazi can very well apply to the "well-being" of others when it takes away someone else's choices!!! I love my non-diet Pepsi. I'm sure that there will soon be efforts to take that away from me, too!

I hate the smell of microwaved fish but I would never consider telling someone he can't have it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 04:13 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,451,929 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesmama View Post
I hate the smell of microwaved fish but I would never consider telling someone he can't have it.
Your neighbor's microwaved fish can't give you cancer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 12:23 PM
 
54 posts, read 147,284 times
Reputation: 30
Smokers suck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top