Warrantless Searches May be Coming to California?

[tickyul]

I think that the 4th already took a big hit last week. The creeps on the Supreme Court gave the prisoncountrypolice more leeway in doing warrantless entry......on so called "suspicion"......as in "we thought we smelled pot coming from the tenants apartment"......jeez.

[steel7]

Originally Posted by tickyul

I think that the 4th already took a big hit last week. The creeps on the Supreme Court gave the prisoncountrypolice more leeway in doing warrantless entry......on so called "suspicion"......as in "we thought we smelled pot coming from the tenants apartment"......jeez.

Thats not good but alot of the constitution of the united states is not followed by many now. The supreme court are supreme creeps.

[ZhugeLiang]

Originally Posted by drunk on kool aid

Why are people blaming liberals for this? This bill is in the service of the RIAA which represents big business.

You clearly didn't read the article. This was proposed by a DEMOCRAT.

[mysticaltyger]

Originally Posted by steel7

Ca has the worse legislature in ca history so im not surprised one bit. The govts (fed, state, county, city) would strip away all our rights if they could but if that happened ALOT of them would live in constant fear 24/7 for their lives.

That's why they don't do it all at once. It's done in gradual process over many decades and the erosion of rights comes from both the right and the left sides of the political spectrum. The right uses the national security/military security/law and order excuse. The left uses the economic security excuse. But security is always the excuse used to take away freedoms/rights.

David Icke calls this process the "totalitarian tiptoe"...although it's been more like a totaltiarian sprint in the last decade.

Icke is most recently interviewed here from ~ 7:00-1:15. The whole interview is worth listening to:


YouTube - ‪David Icke - Coast to Coast AM (March 23, 2011) - The Middle East Agenda‬‏

[Gentoo]

Originally Posted by mysticaltyger

That's why they don't do it all at once. It's done in gradual process over many decades and the erosion of rights comes from both the right and the left sides of the political spectrum. The right uses the national security/military security/law and order excuse. The left uses the economic security excuse. But security is always the excuse used to take away freedoms/rights.

David Icke calls this process the "totalitarian tiptoe"...although it's been more like a totaltiarian sprint in the last decade.

Hmmmm got me thinking here. What you are saying does make sense

[Lovehound]

It's plain to see what's happening here. This is just the latest attempt from the RIAA (or some other recording industry association) to justify their existence to the recording industry so the industry will keep paying dues. Sen. Padilla is plainly in their pocket and he's doing what he's told (so that he can continue receiving campaign contributions).

Nobody expects this to pass, not even Sen. Padilla and the RIAA. They're just trying to scare the public into obeying the laws against copyright infringement.

Your Constitutional rights are safe, or at least they're in no danger from this silly issue.

[Gentoo]

Originally Posted by Lovehound

It's plain to see what's happening here. This is just the latest attempt from the RIAA (or some other recording industry association) to justify their existence to the recording industry so the industry will keep paying dues. Sen. Padilla is plainly in their pocket and he's doing what he's told (so that he can continue receiving campaign contributions).
.

The IRAA could be gotten rid of. However then, there would likely be a government agency to do what the IRAA does and I for one would hate that.