Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-17-2011, 03:35 AM
 
Location: rain city
2,957 posts, read 12,728,000 times
Reputation: 4973

Advertisements

To wit:

BILL NUMBER: SB 432 INTRODUCED BILL TEXT INTRODUCED BY Senator De Le�n FEBRUARY 16, 2011 An act to add Section 6714 to the Labor Code, relating to workplace safety.

.......(1) The use of a fitted sheet, instead of a flat sheet, as the bottom sheet on all beds within the lodging establishment. For the purpose of this section, a "fitted sheet" means a bed sheet containing elastic or similar material sewn into each of the four corners that allows the sheet to stay in place over the mattress.

AND

"....Because this bill would create a new crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program."



New crime....using flat sheets on beds.... of course this will require more prison space for the criminals convicted of subjecting the unwitting public to flat bedsheets.

Too funny for words. You people are so sqrewed by your state government. What a scream.


SB 432 Senate Bill - INTRODUCED

California Outlaws Flat Sheets | Right Wing News
Attached Thumbnails
California bill proposes to outlaw flat sheets on hotel mattresses....bwahahahaa-police-bedsheets.jpg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-17-2011, 03:54 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,548,962 times
Reputation: 21244
I realize your trying to say that California is especially weird when it comes to making laws, but you'd be surprised at some of the stupid laws in all 50 states:
50 Stupid Laws From 50 States
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2011, 04:08 AM
 
Location: Escondido, CA
1,504 posts, read 6,152,719 times
Reputation: 886
In case you were wondering, the logic here is as follows. In order to change a flat sheet, the housekeeper may need to lift the mattress. Mattresses may weigh over 100 pounds, and each housekeeper has to clean 20-30 rooms per day. In combination with other factors, this leads to a statistically significant increase in injury rates (particularly, lower back injury rates) among hotel housekeepers, compared to other service sector workers.

Mandating that all hotels use fitted sheets (which can be changed without lifting the mattress) would reduce the injury rates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2011, 08:12 AM
 
Location: San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties
6,390 posts, read 9,686,006 times
Reputation: 2622
Quote:
Originally Posted by azoria View Post
To wit:

Too funny for words. You people are so sqrewed by your state government. What a scream.
I am sure your grandparents complained similarly about the 40 hour work week law

And your parents complained about the new seat belt law..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2011, 10:14 AM
 
2,093 posts, read 4,698,944 times
Reputation: 1121
Quote:
Originally Posted by esmith143 View Post
In case you were wondering, the logic here is as follows. In order to change a flat sheet, the housekeeper may need to lift the mattress. Mattresses may weigh over 100 pounds, and each housekeeper has to clean 20-30 rooms per day. In combination with other factors, this leads to a statistically significant increase in injury rates (particularly, lower back injury rates) among hotel housekeepers, compared to other service sector workers.

Mandating that all hotels use fitted sheets (which can be changed without lifting the mattress) would reduce the injury rates.
As someone who is in the hospitality industry, I'd be interested to see the statistic you are citing from.

Housekeepers do not need to lift the entire mattress up. They can simply lift one corner at a time to tuck in the flat sheet as they go around the bed. On average, a housekeeper can clean anywhere from 12 to 20 rooms. I'd be hard press to believe that they can clean up to 30 rooms a day in an 8 hour shift. That usually means 16 minutes of allotted time per room, unless they work in a motel that shows little regard for cleanliness and sanitation for the next incoming guest.

Housekeepers should be trained to work efficiently to prevent injury, but we don't need a legislation that bans flat sheets, especially when they are created by a lawmaker that is very misinformed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2011, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Escondido, CA
1,504 posts, read 6,152,719 times
Reputation: 886
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimC2462 View Post
As someone who is in the hospitality industry, I'd be interested to see the statistic you are citing from.

Housekeepers do not need to lift the entire mattress up. They can simply lift one corner at a time to tuck in the flat sheet as they go around the bed. On average, a housekeeper can clean anywhere from 12 to 20 rooms. I'd be hard press to believe that they can clean up to 30 rooms a day in an 8 hour shift. That usually means 16 minutes of allotted time per room, unless they work in a motel that shows little regard for cleanliness and sanitation for the next incoming guest.

Housekeepers should be trained to work efficiently to prevent injury, but we don't need a legislation that bans flat sheets, especially when they are created by a lawmaker that is very misinformed.
I am citing directly from the bill analysis. From some googling, it seems that 15 to 20 is most common, but 30 room quotas also exist in some places.

SB 432 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis

Also see here

As injuries soar, Sacramentans offer help to Hyatt's housekeepers » peoplesworld

and here

http://www.sustainableproduction.org...rt.pdf#page=31

I doubt that training housekeepers to prevent back injury would be cheaper than simply phasing out flat sheets and replacing them with fitted sheets over time.

Last edited by esmith143; 08-17-2011 at 01:43 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2011, 02:56 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
1,472 posts, read 3,547,429 times
Reputation: 1583
I worked in hotels in Yosemite as a front desk clerk during the summer while in college. We were cross-trained to clean rooms when the need arose and I didn't have to hoist the mattress around to slide a flat sheet between it and the box springs. If you have to, you're doing it the wrong way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2011, 02:57 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,222,200 times
Reputation: 35014
There is nothing wrong with evaluating this kind of thing from time to time. Nobody can argue that mattresses have changed a lot over the years. My mom put a foam topper on hers and tucks her sheets under that rather than the mattress itself. This is one of those things that sounds so silly unless you have to work with it yourself. The hotel chain cited admits their mattresses now weigh over 100 lbs and that is NOT something people had to deal with 20 years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2011, 03:01 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,707,101 times
Reputation: 23295
The legislators need to get their head out of their collective asses on this one. What a monumental waste of time.

However what is wrong with fitted sheets? Cost I am assuming

Making my own king size bed I can see where it would cut down on time to use the fitted sheets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2011, 03:12 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,222,200 times
Reputation: 35014
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
The legislators need to get their head out of their collective asses on this one. What a monumental waste of time.

However what is wrong with fitted sheets? Cost I am assuming

Making my own king size bed I can see where it would cut down on time to use the fitted sheets.
I'm not sure it's a waste of time if it's a problem for a significant number of workers. Not sure it needs to be a LAW however if the hotels can come to the same conclusion on their own. Unfortunately these days nobody wants to do anything unless they have to.

But I'm sure it's a matter of cost. With flat sheets you can use them for top and bottom, with fitted it's one more type of sheet to purchase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top