Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-09-2011, 11:09 AM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,087,251 times
Reputation: 4365

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottfreez View Post
Trying to view this objectively... Pretty hard...

Someone explain the reasons why this was passed? I mean, for lack of suitable word, the rationale?

Why should any illegal who isn't paying income tax be allowed to receive bennies? No doubt to the expense of legal taxpayers..
You aren't trying very hard because you're not even characterizing matters correctly. Firstly the dream act doesn't apply to "any illegal", instead illegals that look pretty much like legal US/state residents except their legal status, that is they or their parents are going to be paying taxes.

In terms of the rationale, its pretty simple, there are numerous youngsters in California (and similar) states that quack just like legal residents, but due to dysfunctional federal immigration policy they can't become legal. These people aren't going any where, so its a question of whether you're going to give them a chance to better themselves or join gangs, etc. California can't grant these folks legal US residency, but they can grant them a sort of defacto residency within California.

Also, just to note, there was a similar federal policy in 2010 (that is now dead in the water because the Republican controlled house) that was going to grant youngsters a path to legal residency via college. Furthermore, other border states have similar policies, even highly conservative Texas.

 
Old 10-09-2011, 11:18 AM
 
5,113 posts, read 5,972,261 times
Reputation: 1748
Quote:
Originally Posted by nullgeo View Post
I enjoy watching this controversy get peoples knickers all up in a bunch ... as usual huge numbers of folks focus on sideshows, ignoring the big issues ... there are good arguments for educating youth from disadvantaged backgrounds ... these youth are here ... figure out how to
• have them not be here to begin with --
• or deal with them in uneducated poverty and what poverty breeds --
• or utilize them as educated opportunity breeds.
But before you worry about any of those three options, consider that there are MUCH bigger fish to fry in solving the threats to economy and democracy that we face. Consider the prioritization of these issues. There are financial elites controlling politics and controlling opinion ... the elites love to play distraction issues to keep you all under their thumbs ... getting you excited about the appearance of injustice and threat -- while they walk away eating the real cake.

Here's your threat in this case:
"undocumented students would only become eligible for Cal Grants once all resident students have received such an award. Analysis of the bill by the Assembly noted that the demand for the aid -- which can provide up to $12,192 a year to pay for college expenses at qualifying California academic institutions or trade schools -- far exceeds the amount of funding typically provided, making it unlikely that undocumented students would be considered. The California Department of Finance estimates that 2,500 students, at a cost to the state of $14.5 million, will qualify for Cal Grants thanks to AB 131. This represents 1 percent of Cal Grant's total $1.4 billion funding ..."

So, Jerry signed a Bill that gets him political points where he targets ... but the Bill doesn't really cost him (or the population) hardly anything in real dollars. It's all smoke and mirrors. Illusion. Yeah ... freak out about this 1% of Cal Grant, while 1% of our population runs amok with the real money ... guiding your desires through trends and fashions and all your consumer fueled desires.
Your quoting liberal propaganda spin to make your argument which I say is bogus and your just supporting the liberal agenda. You know exactly why illegals are getting all the public funding support and what it means to the progressive liberal agenda. Yes, you talk about the elites masterminding everything ... but we all know the elites are the progressive liberals.
 
Old 10-09-2011, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Indianapolis
3,892 posts, read 5,513,903 times
Reputation: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don9 View Post
Your quoting liberal propaganda spin to make your argument which I say is bogus and your just supporting the liberal agenda. You know exactly why illegals are getting all the public funding support and what it means to the progressive liberal agenda. Yes, you talk about the elites masterminding everything ... but we all know the elites are the progressive liberals.
LOL that is so true!
 
Old 10-09-2011, 11:26 AM
 
5,113 posts, read 5,972,261 times
Reputation: 1748
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
You aren't trying very hard because you're not even characterizing matters correctly. Firstly the dream act doesn't apply to "any illegal", instead illegals that look pretty much like legal US/state residents except their legal status, that is they or their parents are going to be paying taxes.

In terms of the rationale, its pretty simple, there are numerous youngsters in California (and similar) states that quack just like legal residents, but due to dysfunctional federal immigration policy they can't become legal. These people aren't going any where, so its a question of whether you're going to give them a chance to better themselves or join gangs, etc. California can't grant these folks legal US residency, but they can grant them a sort of defacto residency within California.

Also, just to note, there was a similar federal policy in 2010 (that is now dead in the water because the Republican controlled house) that was going to grant youngsters a path to legal residency via college. Furthermore, other border states have similar policies, even highly conservative Texas.
So you think all illegals should be legal and should be able to tap tax payer funds. You think we should have open borders and allow anyone to come and go as they please but the USA tax payers are still on the hook to pay for their welfare.

Do you also believe we should eliminate capitalism?

Last edited by Vascodagama; 10-09-2011 at 11:41 AM..
 
Old 10-09-2011, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,087,251 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don9 View Post
So you think all illegals should be legal and should be able to tap tax payer funds. You think we should have open borders and allow anyone to come and go as they please but the USA tax payers are still on the hook to pay for their welfare.
Nope, I don't think all illegals should be legal, but the ones that are smart enough and motivated enough to get into college? You bet.

Should the US have open borders? No, it should have a more open immigration policy with controlled borders.

But like before (with European immigration), much of this is going to be a non-issue in the next 1-2 decades due to birthright citizenship.
 
Old 10-09-2011, 11:46 AM
 
5,113 posts, read 5,972,261 times
Reputation: 1748
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
Nope, I don't think all illegals should be legal, but the ones that are smart enough and motivated enough to get into college? You bet.

Should the US have open borders? No, it should have a more open immigration policy with controlled borders.

But like before (with European immigration), much of this is going to be a non-issue in the next 1-2 decades due to birthright citizenship.
With the current policies ... in 1-2 decades the overwhelming majority will be Mexicans.
 
Old 10-09-2011, 11:50 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,219,039 times
Reputation: 7373
Someone is trying to organize efforts to repeal it:

Assemblyman Tim Donnelly, R-Twin Peaks, said the bill would force citizens to compete with undocumented immigrants for public resources...

Donnelly set up a website headlined, "Stop the Nightmare Act," and he pledged to launch a referendum campaign.



Governor OKs college aid for undocumented immigrants in California - Sacramento News - Local and Breaking Sacramento News | Sacramento Bee
 
Old 10-09-2011, 11:53 AM
 
296 posts, read 614,327 times
Reputation: 231
First: Thank you to user_id and null geo for your respective previous comments.

I don't know much about the scenario- what constitutes an "illegal" who is eligible for such benefits, and what the actual wording of the bill is.

Second: I ask that commentors, when making factual statements, would include links to relevant sources.

Unlike a lot of posters who tend towards knee-jerk responses and allegations of propaganda spinning on behalf of their detractors (we all know who you are and I won't bother calling you out, but simply rather state that your views are rendered hollow by your rhetoric and you might as well give up now because you're not convincing anyone), I'm here to try and understand the details of the situation. And that's why I asked.

It is indeed hard to believe that the case could be so simple - so completely wrong - that a California governor would simply sign over a huge amount of taxpayer money to illegal immigrants who are paying no tax and thus depriving deserving taxpayers of tose resources.

Null Geo and UserID- please provide links for your statements? Thanks.
 
Old 10-09-2011, 11:54 AM
 
2,093 posts, read 4,698,293 times
Reputation: 1121
Quote:
Originally Posted by nullgeo View Post
I enjoy watching this controversy get peoples knickers all up in a bunch ... as usual huge numbers of folks focus on sideshows, ignoring the big issues ... there are good arguments for educating youth from disadvantaged backgrounds ... these youth are here ... figure out how to
• have them not be here to begin with --
• or deal with them in uneducated poverty and what poverty breeds --
• or utilize them as educated opportunity breeds.
But before you worry about any of those three options, consider that there are MUCH bigger fish to fry in solving the threats to economy and democracy that we face. Consider the prioritization of these issues. There are financial elites controlling politics and controlling opinion ... the elites love to play distraction issues to keep you all under their thumbs ... getting you excited about the appearance of injustice and threat -- while they walk away eating the real cake.

What does this have to do with the current topic at hand?

As I've mentioned before, removing illegal immigrants by the masses would be a logistical nightmare. Our government on the state and federal level will never deport the illegal immigrants who are, at a certain extent, an integral part of our overall economy. I'd rather they be educated to become productive members of our society.

That said, I don't support illegal immigration. I am a strong proponent of enforcing the immigration laws and setting quotas. I'm not sure if you and the others feel the same, however.
 
Old 10-09-2011, 11:56 AM
 
5,113 posts, read 5,972,261 times
Reputation: 1748
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
Someone is trying to organize efforts to repeal it:

Assemblyman Tim Donnelly, R-Twin Peaks, said the bill would force citizens to compete with undocumented immigrants for public resources...

Donnelly set up a website headlined, "Stop the Nightmare Act," and he pledged to launch a referendum campaign.



Governor OKs college aid for undocumented immigrants in California - Sacramento News - Local and Breaking Sacramento News | Sacramento Bee
We need to recall Brown
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top