Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-19-2014, 12:41 AM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,618,997 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

In this week’s “Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don’t” file: A Southern California couple received a letter from Glendora city officials threatening to fine them $500 if they don’t get their sun-scorched brown lawn green again, reports AP. Which Laura Whitney and Michael Korte would gladly do, except for one thing: They could also be fined $500 if they water their lawn too much; they're currently only watering twice a week.

Couple Could Be Fined $500 if They Water Lawn, $500 if They Don't - CA cities don't like brown lawns, despite state mandate to conserve water
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-19-2014, 12:45 AM
 
Location: O.C.
2,821 posts, read 3,540,389 times
Reputation: 2102
Gotta love living in a nanny state run by crazy liberals...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2014, 12:54 PM
 
Location: Cushing OK
14,539 posts, read 21,271,006 times
Reputation: 16939
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
In this week’s “Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don’t” file: A Southern California couple received a letter from Glendora city officials threatening to fine them $500 if they don’t get their sun-scorched brown lawn green again, reports AP. Which Laura Whitney and Michael Korte would gladly do, except for one thing: They could also be fined $500 if they water their lawn too much; they're currently only watering twice a week.

Couple Could Be Fined $500 if They Water Lawn, $500 if They Don't - CA cities don't like brown lawns, despite state mandate to conserve water
I lived in Riverside the last major drought. Our lawn was dead since the city requested lawns not be watered. But a neighbor had his nice green lawn and continually called the code inspector about the brown ones. He told us to let the hose drip just a little bit. There was this one bit of green grass. The city law the mancontent was citing was one requiring landscaping. He saw on patch of green grass it was landscaping and it passed.

I'd like to see one of these cases go to court. I'll be the state ban on watering wins out over the pretty green lawn cities. They could use the straypaint method, let it die, mow it and paint it grass greeen. Easy and it doesn't get taller.

Friend of mine's mom lived in Glendora. Not surprised.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2014, 01:22 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,829,035 times
Reputation: 6509
Welcome to California
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2014, 07:46 PM
 
Location: Madison, WI
1,044 posts, read 2,769,660 times
Reputation: 984
Use reclaimed water? A bucket in the shower should go a long way toward keeping the lawn green, at no additional cost. Better yet, replace the lawn with drought-tolerant plants, or rocks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2014, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
9,197 posts, read 16,850,084 times
Reputation: 6373
Lawns are obsolete leftovers from Post War days. Shouldn't have to wait for a crisis to realize that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2014, 12:12 AM
 
2,088 posts, read 1,975,939 times
Reputation: 3169
The pictures of that particular couples' yard look pretty bad. They are obviously lying when they said they are watering twice a week. They are not trying to conserve water, they just are too lazy to take care of their yard. I think Xeriscaping looks ok, and if the couple really wanted to conserve water, they could put in drought resistant plants. Another article about this couple said the water authority for that area showed the couples' water use had actually increased since the drought, so they weren't bothering to water before the drought either. They're just lazy people that don't take care of their property, and they are hoping some publicity can get them out of a fine for their laziness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2014, 12:13 AM
 
35,094 posts, read 51,273,394 times
Reputation: 62669
Astro turf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2014, 01:45 AM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,359,422 times
Reputation: 21892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texamichiforniasota View Post
The pictures of that particular couples' yard look pretty bad. They are obviously lying when they said they are watering twice a week. They are not trying to conserve water, they just are too lazy to take care of their yard. I think Xeriscaping looks ok, and if the couple really wanted to conserve water, they could put in drought resistant plants. Another article about this couple said the water authority for that area showed the couples' water use had actually increased since the drought, so they weren't bothering to water before the drought either. They're just lazy people that don't take care of their property, and they are hoping some publicity can get them out of a fine for their laziness.
I saw that picture as well and the brown lawn is not the only eyesore.

We have the same issues in Oxnard as far as water use rules. We can water the yard between the hours of 4pm and 9am, but only for 15 minutes per sprinkler or section of the yard. I usually do this two or three times a week and my yard is green. I have some palm trees that like to have water every day. I water them in the evening for just a few minutes, just to soak the soil. Our water bill is not too bad. Then again we only have a 6,000 square foot lot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2014, 03:22 AM
 
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
9,197 posts, read 16,850,084 times
Reputation: 6373
Needs vs. wants, people. Can we differentiate between the two in a crisis?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top