Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-14-2019, 10:22 AM
 
1,203 posts, read 667,985 times
Reputation: 1596

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by opossum1 View Post
CA doesn't need more rentals. It needs more home owners who reside where they own, not more people owning multiple homes
- combined with reduction in population.
So the effects of this law are beautiful if they prevent one from creating yet another slum rental chicken coop in their backyard or another rip-off rental house.
In fact there should be extremely strong protections for buyers who expect to reside in their homes and any investors should be barred from buying until the property sat there on the market for a year, at least.
Nothing stopping people from owning homes if they wish to do so. What do you even mean "strong protections for buyers"? Are you saying that current home owners can only sell their homes to future home owners? Cool you just reduced their potential buyer pool and devalued all of their properties. Good luck ever getting that passed. Also how are you going to monitor it? You going to send out inspectors every year to make sure that all homes are owner occupied?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-14-2019, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Formerly Pleasanton Ca, now in Marietta Ga
10,348 posts, read 8,567,170 times
Reputation: 16693
Quote:
Originally Posted by opossum1 View Post
CA doesn't need more rentals. It needs more home owners who reside where they own, not more people owning multiple homes
- combined with reduction in population.
So the effects of this law are beautiful if they prevent one from creating yet another slum rental chicken coop in their backyard or another rip-off rental house.
In fact there should be extremely strong protections for buyers who expect to reside in their homes and any investors should be barred from buying until the property sat there on the market for a year, at least.
I think it’s short sighted. Cut out rentals and that leaves a lot of people that still can’t afford to buy a house at lower prices with nowhere to live. You will find a large number of people who argue that there already aren’t enough rentals in California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2019, 11:15 AM
 
6,089 posts, read 4,986,718 times
Reputation: 5985
Quote:
Originally Posted by wac_432 View Post
This is absolutely true. I was considering building a long-term rental unit on my R-1 property. Even though I would be exempt from the current law, the state has shown that it is more than willing to step in and even postdate laws to screw over landlords. LA issued a moratorium on evictions, basically leaving LL's holding the bag.

So, rather than put in a rental unit, I'll either not build at all, or I'll make any addition an STVR instead. Much less risk of being regulated into a money-losing situation, much higher reward.
Exactly.

This is the reality of the market at work. The very threat of government intervention has already reduced supply.

I wish people who vote "D" would get this through their thick skulls. It's hurting the overall rental market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2019, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Yucaipa, California
9,894 posts, read 22,023,427 times
Reputation: 6853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrician4you View Post
Nobody is being evicted. They are however given legal notices of rent raises or termination of lease. Nothing illegal about that.
BIG rent increases by greedy landlords.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2019, 03:54 PM
 
6,089 posts, read 4,986,718 times
Reputation: 5985
Quote:
Originally Posted by steel7 View Post
BIG rent increases by greedy landlords.
You're free to offer your own rental units for FAR below market rate, you know, because you aren't a greedy guy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2019, 05:14 PM
 
1,203 posts, read 667,985 times
Reputation: 1596
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliRestoration View Post
You're free to offer your own rental units for FAR below market rate, you know, because you aren't a greedy guy.
Lol. As if he even owns real estate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2019, 06:13 PM
 
Location: Formerly Pleasanton Ca, now in Marietta Ga
10,348 posts, read 8,567,170 times
Reputation: 16693
Quote:
Originally Posted by steel7 View Post
BIG rent increases by greedy landlords.
Care to back up your statement?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2019, 09:04 AM
 
6,089 posts, read 4,986,718 times
Reputation: 5985
Quote:
Originally Posted by bad debt View Post
Lol. As if he even owns real estate?
That's my point. The people usually screaming "Greedy landlords!" aren't actually property owners.

They have no idea of the cost that go into maintaining a property, the effort to screen tenants, and the overall overhead of owning a property for rental (especially in California where the regulatory burden is steep).

The same group of people who say things like "My healthcare and college education should be free!"

Why, or even how? They don't know, they just want free stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2019, 09:56 AM
 
2,560 posts, read 2,301,951 times
Reputation: 3214
Quote:
Originally Posted by steel7 View Post
BIG rent increases by greedy landlords.
Should be able to charge whatever they want! It's called "FREEDOM."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2019, 09:58 AM
 
2,560 posts, read 2,301,951 times
Reputation: 3214
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliRestoration View Post
That's my point. The people usually screaming "Greedy landlords!" aren't actually property owners.

They have no idea of the cost that go into maintaining a property, the effort to screen tenants, and the overall overhead of owning a property for rental (especially in California where the regulatory burden is steep).

The same group of people who say things like "My healthcare and college education should be free!"

Why, or even how? They don't know, they just want free stuff.
They should be forced to come up with housing on their own! They should be thankful that there are actually properties available to rent!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top