Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-22-2014, 01:04 PM
 
Location: All Over
4,003 posts, read 6,096,237 times
Reputation: 3162

Advertisements

I'd like to buy a vacant lot in Pilsen and put in a shipping container home. I read some stuff saying Chicago zoning won't allow it but found an article about the first shipping container home comming to Chicago so wonder if they do allow it.

It doesn't appear that Chicago specifically bans them but I guess probably hard to get them to meet code since there's not really any universal standards.

Curious if anyone knows about shipping container homes in Chicago.

Chicago's First Prefab Modular House - Bob Vila
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2014, 01:46 PM
 
28,455 posts, read 85,339,930 times
Reputation: 18728
doodle, you are kidding yourself.

Lets do a little math:
"he original prototype first had to be scaled down to fit the lot size. Then Sommers and the Caisleys tweaked the 2,039 square-foot interior.cSommers is now able to offer customizable green homes priced at $150 – $250 per square foot."

2039 * 150
= 305850

250 * 2039
= 509750

http://www.redfin.com/IL/Chicago/163.../home/39598451 $105,000

Basically cheaper to get a "regular" developer built place -- http://www.redfin.com/IL/Chicago/172.../home/28519016

Even if the $303850 +$105000 were to include all the costs of transportation &setup (you did read that this was NOT a "shipping container house" but was a "prefab" built offsite and then hoisted into place after having things like expensive STREET CLOSURES and MASSIVE CRANES rented (which I sorta doubt) the bottom line is you STILL need to "site prep" done and utility connections and all the other stuff that will require MASSSIVE amounts of HASSLE when the permits & inspection are so far outside the norm.

I mean I can sorta see somebody living out in some "wide open spaces" type frontier off the grid living in a shipping container but there are sound reasons that Chicago does NOT want to see these things. Think about it -- even if you super insulated the thing to isolate yourself from the cold and made the thing secure against all the other climate factors this is going to HURT all the tradespeople that are big part of the regional economy and help some yahoos in rural Indiana that typically build "mobile homes".

In the biggest picture I gotta tell you that years ago my family had a situation where we inherited some land way up in the WI northwoods and we did decide to have a "vacation home" put on the site from a "manufactured housing" firm and we did OK selling it, but the alternative up there was to have guys basically "camp out" with bears for a whole summer or get the thing built "in town" and then hauled up in the space of a month. Totally different situation than trying to mess with what is ESSENTIALLY ALREADY a "factory model" of various tradespeople building a house in a developed area...

Last edited by chet everett; 03-22-2014 at 01:59 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Northwest Indiana
815 posts, read 2,997,312 times
Reputation: 1072
Building conventional houses in the city is a big enough hassle. If you want to try something outside the norm, the city of Chicago isn't the place for it. Just too much red tape and bureaucracy. Low cost new construction is basically banned for the most part by city code.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 08:26 PM
 
14,798 posts, read 17,675,454 times
Reputation: 9246
Why do you want to live in a container?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2014, 10:11 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
1,988 posts, read 2,222,609 times
Reputation: 1536
I hope not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2014, 02:37 AM
 
4,857 posts, read 7,606,822 times
Reputation: 6394
With all the rules and regulations that need to be met, there won't be any cost savings for the people buying them. But I can see those squared off, modern looking prefab homes catching on over the next 10-15 yrs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2014, 03:22 AM
 
Location: Wake County, NC
2,983 posts, read 4,621,173 times
Reputation: 3529
Chicago's climate is way too harsh for this type of building system. You would lose a lot of precious interior space adding insulation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2014, 10:47 AM
 
Location: All Over
4,003 posts, read 6,096,237 times
Reputation: 3162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlajos View Post
Why do you want to live in a container?
I love the design of shipping container homes. Granted you could build boxy houses without using shippingcontainers but they are meant to hold lots of weight and be stacked, can't find a more structurally sound building material or shape than shipping containers. Also, I kinda like the minimalist micro housing movement going on right now. If shipping container isn't in the cards for me considering living on a boat down in Charleston SC or possibly even living out a van and traveling for a while

If Chicago wasn't such a pain in the ass to deal with it would actually be a very affordable way to build a home, $1500 or so per container so wind up with about 1200sq feet for about 4K and then obviously gotta hookup electric, plumbing, etc. Chicago may not allow it but ideally if you built one of these in ohter areas you could do solar and composting toilets and be off the grid so to speak.

I actually have a buddy who used to build prefab houses though he would do a bit of customizing and do bay windows and stuff. He knows how to do pretty much everything building from scratch and I thought he'd make a great guy for this project, also he normally works for me for pretty cheap.

I think you guys are right even though this could potentially be a very cheap way to build a home after bribing alderman and code inspectors and hiring lawyers and of course architects and engineers to prove it's structurally sound even though you really couldn't find a more structurally sound material it would be costly. I'd really prefer not to be out in the sticks but in Illinois I imaigne maybe thats the only way to do this.

In some cities that aren't such a mess they actually encourage shipping container homes as a green and cheap alternative to typical consturction, cities like Portland, Seattle, Vancouver etc love this type of stuff and probably can actually get some subsidies but in Chicago I think you guys are righ probably not doable unless you wanna spend more than it would cost to just build a house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2014, 10:50 AM
 
Location: All Over
4,003 posts, read 6,096,237 times
Reputation: 3162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Not_liking_FL View Post
Chicago's climate is way too harsh for this type of building system. You would lose a lot of precious interior space adding insulation.
Your right that when you add insulation to walls, floor and roof as well as flooring you are losing a few inches her and there which when your working iwth a small space to begin with is rough but I believe the shipping containers are ribbed anyway so that space is pretty much lost with or without insulation.

Also, your not restricted to just a container, many people use containers as a base and also frame out from the container. Also you could cut a hole in the top and put a loft. Your not really restricted to strictly living wtihin the container. Because of how they can be positioned and shaped I'd probably do something where I had a courtyard type deal between containers and during the few decent months we have here would really utilize the outdoor space for living as well
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2015, 11:39 AM
 
Location: East Central Pennsylvania/ Chicago for 6yrs.
2,535 posts, read 3,278,425 times
Reputation: 1483
If Tokyo ain't doing it.... why should a VIBRANT... WITH GREAT HOUSING ... City like Chicago have container neighborhoods? May as well do trailer courts?

When developers can start buying up areas in bad neighborhoods, where maybe over half the housing is gone?? Start some new development of decently affordable housing? Modular homes could work? I felt many moons ago .... When President Reagan wanted to do tax free investment zones in depressed areas... I thought is could have kicked stared things way back then? Though gentrification is still revitalizing .... it raises pricing... But still cities need it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top