Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-06-2016, 11:53 AM
 
Location: N. Fort Myers, FL
3,348 posts, read 1,645,163 times
Reputation: 102

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmiej View Post
Jesus also said, "This is my blood, which is shed for the forgiveness of sins." Why do liberals ignore that?
my reply to that would be that 1) dividing those into "liberals" is surely artificial, and 2) to contrast themselves with the religious, in the same manner that Christ did, perhaps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-06-2016, 11:57 AM
 
Location: N. Fort Myers, FL
3,348 posts, read 1,645,163 times
Reputation: 102
see, if a bunch of strongmen assume the mantle of Christ, and go around "pleading the Blood" everywhere, while simultaneously placing hands on degenerate candidates to protect them from "satanic attack," they show themselves to be hypocrites, throwing Christ into suspicion also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2016, 11:59 AM
 
Location: N. Fort Myers, FL
3,348 posts, read 1,645,163 times
Reputation: 102
iow it surely does not matter if they "ignore" the words, from your pov, if they then go and pick up their cross, spiritually speaking, hence

A man who is physically uncircumcised, but who fulfills the law, will judge you
who are a lawbreaker in spite of having the letter of the law and circumcision.


and yes, i am aware of the fundamental interpretation of this verse, but one should reflect on the other possible interpretations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2016, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,456 posts, read 12,848,808 times
Reputation: 2497
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbyrd009 View Post
my reply to that would be that 1) dividing those into "liberals" is surely artificial, and 2) to contrast themselves with the religious, in the same manner that Christ did, perhaps.
The liberals here like to throw around the term "fundamentalist", so I decided to join in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2016, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,456 posts, read 12,848,808 times
Reputation: 2497
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbyrd009 View Post
iow it surely does not matter if they "ignore" the words, from your pov, if they then go and pick up their cross, spiritually speaking, hence

A man who is physically uncircumcised, but who fulfills the law, will judge you
who are a lawbreaker in spite of having the letter of the law and circumcision.


and yes, i am aware of the fundamental interpretation of this verse, but one should reflect on the other possible interpretations.
Such as?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2016, 12:07 PM
 
Location: N. Fort Myers, FL
3,348 posts, read 1,645,163 times
Reputation: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmiej View Post
The liberals here like to throw around the term "fundamentalist", so I decided to join in.
hmm. i think if we tried to make a common lexicon of terms, we would see that there is little agreement there. I still have not grasped how "Fundie" is denigrating, myself. Misleading, quite possibly; i would call most fundies "literalists" or something. "Liberal" is a political term, to me; and i view religion and politics as inseparable, can't-have-one-without-the-other, so to me a true "fundamentalist" would not even recognize the term.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2016, 12:11 PM
 
Location: New England
37,340 posts, read 28,393,674 times
Reputation: 2747
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmiej View Post
Jesus also said, "This is my blood, which is shed for the forgiveness of sins." Why do liberals ignore that?
Love covers a multitude of sin. If it was not love manifest on the cross then what in your mind was it ?.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2016, 12:12 PM
 
Location: N. Fort Myers, FL
3,348 posts, read 1,645,163 times
Reputation: 102
amen. a more pointed Q is "does "Love your neighbor" fulfill all of the requirements for salvation? imo
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmiej View Post
Such as?
um, well; i would just read the verse without preconceptions, maybe in several translations, and let it speak to you. To me, i roughly get

"a guy who physically does not conform to any of our preconceptions about what a believer looks like, yet picks up their cross and follows Christ in practice will judge the religious guys, who claim to have the only way, yet argue that Christ's Commands must be reconciled with Paul for salvation."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2016, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,456 posts, read 12,848,808 times
Reputation: 2497
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbyrd009 View Post
hmm. i think if we tried to make a common lexicon of terms, we would see that there is little agreement there. I still have not grasped how "Fundie" is denigrating, myself. Misleading, quite possibly; i would call most fundies "literalists" or something. "Liberal" is a political term, to me; and i view religion and politics as inseparable, can't-have-one-without-the-other, so to me a true "fundamentalist" would not even recognize the term.
Is "liberal" denegrating?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2016, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,456 posts, read 12,848,808 times
Reputation: 2497
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbyrd009 View Post
amen. a more pointed Q is "does "Love your neighbor" fulfill all of the requirements for salvation? imo
um, well; i would just read the verse without preconceptions, maybe in several translations, and let it speak to you. To me, i roughly get

"a guy who physically does not conform to any of our preconceptions about what a believer looks like, yet picks up their cross and follows Christ in practice will judge the religious guys, who claim to have the only way, yet argue that Christ's Commands must be reconciled with Paul for salvation."
And I read it while cross-referencing with other scripture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top