Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-07-2011, 10:59 PM
 
343 posts, read 804,883 times
Reputation: 217

Advertisements

The Trinity in DFW is really not much of a river at all so I would say DFW is the largest that isnt on a major body of water or river.
Houston's bayous arent really rivers either, but the city sits on the Gulf of Mexico
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-07-2011, 11:03 PM
 
Location: Chicago
3,569 posts, read 7,194,814 times
Reputation: 2637
Wouldn't it be impossible for a city to exist
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2011, 11:12 AM
 
Location: The big blue yonder...
2,061 posts, read 3,734,700 times
Reputation: 1183
Dallas

Atlanta

Phoenix

San Antonio

Denver

Charlotte

Las Vegas

Birmingham
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2011, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,973,386 times
Reputation: 4323
Quote:
Originally Posted by A2DAC1985 View Post
I don't think Phoenix is #1 in this category. I believe this "honor" goes to Indianapolis.

While Indy does have a "river" going through it, it is, from what I understand, the longest NON-NAVIGABLE river in America. That is, putting two inflatable rafts next to each other in the river is going to be a tight fit.
But Indianapolis is much smaller than Phoenix.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2011, 01:28 PM
 
801 posts, read 1,512,611 times
Reputation: 525
Phoenix is the largest metro area but Houston is the largest city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2011, 05:48 PM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,690 posts, read 9,935,924 times
Reputation: 3448
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrfox View Post
Dallas's River is really more of a dried riverbed with a small stream winding through the middle of it for most of the year. You're not exactly going to see much shipping or recreational traffic heading up and down it.
It's because the Trinity River is dammed in multiple places to control the flow of the river and to create lakes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2011, 05:54 PM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,690 posts, read 9,935,924 times
Reputation: 3448
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psykomonkee View Post
Dallas

Atlanta

Phoenix

San Antonio

Denver

Charlotte

Las Vegas

Birmingham
Dallas has a river.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2011, 02:24 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,514 posts, read 33,513,431 times
Reputation: 12147
Quote:
Originally Posted by iMarvin View Post
Phoenix is the largest metro area but Houston is the largest city.
Actually, I would give Houston sitting on Galveston Bay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2011, 03:59 AM
 
Location: Chicago
1,312 posts, read 1,869,401 times
Reputation: 1488
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Easy View Post
But Indianapolis is much smaller than Phoenix.
Phoenix has an area of 516.7 sq miles and a population of 1.4 million.

Indianapolis has an area of 361 sq miles and a population of 820,000.

If you go to Google maps, and put in Indianapolis, it will take you to a screen with a view of the whole city area. You can see water running through Phoenix, you can't see the White River in Indy until you zoom in a lot more.

So essentially there is water in Indy, but no one can ever use it for more than "Yep. There's some water."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2011, 07:26 AM
 
Location: South St Louis
4,363 posts, read 4,559,063 times
Reputation: 3165
It's strange to me that explorers or founding fathers would ever bother to establish a town with no ready source of drinking water nearby. And perhaps stranger still that some of these towns eventually grew into major cities. What was it that made people want to settle there in the first place?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top