Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-16-2011, 04:09 PM
 
Location: The Greatest city on Earth: City of Atlanta Proper
8,485 posts, read 14,994,819 times
Reputation: 7333

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY View Post

Chicago city: 66%
Illinois state: 76%
US national: 74%

Chicago did an awful job, whether it counters it or not, but that's a terrible job for a city of its size. The city officials should have been more adept on getting people involved.
We'll see tomorrow.

Just checked and Houston's participation rate was 70% and Dallas' was 68%. That's not really all that much better. If there is a huge swing then the theory will hold true, but I'm still thinking that Chicago overestimated how many residents they had in combination with a poor count.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-16-2011, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,462 posts, read 5,707,576 times
Reputation: 6093
Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY View Post

Chicago did an awful job, whether it counters it or not, but that's a terrible job for a city of its size. The city officials should have been more adept on getting people involved.
Meh its not that surprising really. NYC participation rate is like 63% and Jersey city is even lower at around 60%. It sure sucks that legal immigrants can't fill out a census form unless they speak ~4 languages that are on it. it is oh so obvious that immigrants from Indonesia get to fill out Chinese/Spanish forms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,043,145 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
Meh its not that surprising really. NYC participation rate is like 63% and Jersey city is even lower at around 60%. It sure sucks that legal immigrants can't fill out a census form unless they speak ~4 languages that are on it.
For what it's worth, I always thought that New York was under counted to in this aspect. It really is amazing how a few people can ruin it for a city and state, isn't it? The way the US Census operates is outdated, and its just very inefficient method altogether. They really need to implement better tactics than they already have set.

If they had better turnout's, maybe some of the states wouldn't lose as many electoral seats as they did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 04:26 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,462 posts, read 5,707,576 times
Reputation: 6093
Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY View Post
For what it's worth, I always thought that New York was under counted to in this aspect. It really is amazing how a few people can ruin it for a city and state, isn't it?

If they had better turnout's, maybe some of the states wouldn't lose as many electoral seats as they did.
About 10% of the city residents DO NOT EVEN SPEAK THE LANGUAGES THAT ARE ON THE FORM TO BEGIN WITH! How the hell are they supposed to fill them out?

Census treats NYC like its Texas (no offense to Texas) where everyone either speaks English/Spanish + maybe a little Chinese.
It would be a major breakthrough if they found out that the majority of people from Asia DO NOT speak Chinese and the majority of the people from Eastern Europe DO NOT speak Russian, and Africans DO NOT speak Spanish!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 04:27 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,043,145 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
About 10% of the city residents DO NOT EVEN SPEAK THE LANGUAGES THAT ARE ON THE FORM TO BEGIN WITH! How the hell are they supposed to fill them out?
The US Census fails!

They need to be torn down, and restarted from scratch again. The US Census agency is known for frustrating people (those that care at least) but they're really a very incompetent agency to begin with. I think I got counted twice for two different cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 04:37 PM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,695 posts, read 9,943,902 times
Reputation: 3449
WOW.....Chicago now has 2.6 million people. It's still a nice city! (I think)

Hopefully, Dallas is over 1.3 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 04:50 PM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,952,147 times
Reputation: 3545
But it's not just Chicago residents not participating in the Census. Apparently, Chicago has lost a lot of the working/middle class residents. Yeah, there are a lot of shiny new highrises, but that doesn't mean the city is growing. There is also a huge Black flight out of Chicago. And Chicago demolished a lot of housing projects. Families replaced by singles and couples.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 04:53 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,043,145 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarface713 View Post
But it's not just Chicago residents not participating in the Census. Apparently, Chicago has lost a lot of the working/middle class residents. Yeah, there are a lot of shiny new highrises, but that doesn't mean the city is growing. There is also a huge Black flight out of Chicago. And Chicago demolished a lot of housing projects. Families replaced by singles and couples.
And then the things like how both the Illinois Department & US Census went on to report how the city population increased from 2007 to 2009, doesn't make much sense at all. And how they stated in the 2.8 Millions.

It doesn't have to be wrong information, but its not publicly correct information if they want to go through a decade of lying, over counting, or overstating reports and then display just the opposite. That's just a very messed up policy from the US Census, whether if a city is experiencing gains or losses.

Those are correlated information based solely off lies or overstatement, in my opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,095 posts, read 34,702,478 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY View Post
According to your link:

Chicago city: 66%
Illinois state: 76%
US national: 74%

Chicago did an awful job, whether it counters it or not, but that's a terrible job for a city of its size. The city officials should have been more adept on getting people involved.
Chicago's numbers were actually identical to Philly's for the 2000 and 2010 Census.

I can't say that either city did a poor job of getting people involved. I just think it's difficult to get people, particularly lower-class poor people, to take a Census form seriously. And there are a lot of poor people in big cities like Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2011, 05:27 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY View Post
The US Census fails!

They need to be torn down, and restarted from scratch again. The US Census agency is known for frustrating people (those that care at least) but they're really a very incompetent agency to begin with. I think I got counted twice for two different cities.

We call this the TX factor here, rampant
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top