Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What would you choose?
Sacramento 63 53.39%
Las Vegas 55 46.61%
Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-15-2014, 09:22 AM
 
Location: City of Angels
2,918 posts, read 5,606,342 times
Reputation: 2267

Advertisements

vegas has better dining, better airport (SMF is useless), better nightlife, better scenery, better tax structure, etc. vegas wins by a pretty significant margin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-15-2014, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Northern California
979 posts, read 2,092,965 times
Reputation: 765
LV is a sandbox. Fun place to visit for a few days and that's it. Who in the world would want to live there?

I'll take Sacramento any day. Walkable neighborhoods, bike friendly, tree-lined streets, Victorians, the Sacramento and American Rivers, the American River Parkway, kayaking, rafting, boating, downtown/midtown, Old Sacramento, and proximity to the Bay Area, Tahoe, snow, mountains, Reno.

Sorry, aside from entertainment, Sacramento offers me a better lifestyle than Vegas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2014, 05:52 PM
 
Location: San Leandro
4,576 posts, read 9,160,255 times
Reputation: 3248
Neveda is the nation's colon. I don't see how anyone could live there. The economy is terrible, with no real jobs outside the tourism industry. At that point you might as well live in orlando.

Vegas is cheap for a reason. No one makes any money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 11:26 AM
 
1,640 posts, read 2,655,346 times
Reputation: 2672
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal Dude View Post
Neveda is the nation's colon. I don't see how anyone could live there. The economy is terrible, with no real jobs outside the tourism industry. At that point you might as well live in orlando.

Vegas is cheap for a reason. No one makes any money.
I agree with you.

I lived in South Florida for years, and I'm convinced that the only metro area in the entire country with worse people quality is Vegas.

I now live in Phoenix, and I must say that Phoenix is a much better alternative to Vegas if it's desert living someone desires--better economy, better weather (warmer winters, more rain), better scenery (Sonoran Desert > Mohave Desert), better gun laws, and much better people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2014, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Worcester
72 posts, read 97,277 times
Reputation: 61
Sacramento. Outside of the Las Vegas area is absolutely nothing for several miles in every direction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2018, 07:11 AM
 
Location: North Raleigh x North Sacramento
5,819 posts, read 5,622,386 times
Reputation: 7118
2018 update on the opinions of these cities. There is a decent number of crossing back and forth between the two, as in, people who are familiar with both cities. Vegas isn't particularly a city I find appealing, but it's reputation as an all-around city seems to be rising fast. Sac also seems to be rising as well, and overall I think they are probably on equal footing...

Where would you choose and why? For my money these are two of the West's rising cities...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2018, 09:40 PM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,814 posts, read 4,007,910 times
Reputation: 3284
Vegas has way more entertainment than Sacto.

More pro sports, more nightlife, more live music venues, more dining, shopping.

Sac is norm core and does not stand out in any way
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2018, 03:12 AM
 
1,999 posts, read 4,873,273 times
Reputation: 2069
Vegas is a well known tourist destination worldwide so of course it will have more entertainment,but I would much rather live in Sacramento simply because of it's Greenery,Climate,Proximity to the Bay Area and it's more Down to Earth and Laid Back,but I don't mind visiting Vegas once in a while,but then i'm ready to come back home to good ole California


Quote:
Originally Posted by WizardOfRadical View Post
Vegas has way more entertainment than Sacto.

More pro sports, more nightlife, more live music venues, more dining, shopping.

Sac is norm core and does not stand out in any way
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2018, 07:15 AM
 
14,798 posts, read 17,676,840 times
Reputation: 9246
Quote:
Originally Posted by sacramento916 View Post
Las Vegas is probably one of the worst cities to live in the country. Sacramento definitely beats Las Vegas in everything except entertainment, however I have to note that its not even entertainment Im fond of.

Also, Sac is not as inland as LV, it is only 1.5 hours to the ocean. It is also very green and surrounded by greenery. It also has a charming central city with a bohemian vibe and independent movie theaters. LV is just a hellhole in the desert full of tacky casinos and prostitutes.
Spot on analysis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2020, 09:09 PM
 
Location: North Raleigh x North Sacramento
5,819 posts, read 5,622,386 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huge Foodie 215 View Post
Both are hot, inland, high growing Western cities with metro sizes of around the same population that are receiving overflow populations from their adjacent CSA's (Bay Area for Sacramento, LA for Las Vegas) and are primarily known for one industry (Gambling for Vegas, State Government for Sacramento), and were both hit by the real estate crisis.

Where would you rather live? Based on:

Politics:
Culture:
Location:
Economy:
Diversity:
Access to other areas:
Entertainment:
Anything Else?:
2020 based on the original criteria. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top