Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-08-2013, 05:29 PM
 
37,881 posts, read 41,933,711 times
Reputation: 27279

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepless in Bham View Post
Looking from the outside, I would of thought that those two and High Point would be working together for the benefit of region as a whole.
Well High Point really doesn't have much of a dog in the fight being the smallest principal city of the area. But if cities and suburbs can't get along in many metro areas throughout the country, why do you think two similarly-sized principal cities would?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2013, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Metro Birmingham, AL
1,672 posts, read 2,878,205 times
Reputation: 1246
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
Well High Point really doesn't have much of a dog in the fight being the smallest principal city of the area. But if cities and suburbs can't get along in many metro areas throughout the country, why do you think two similarly-sized principal cities would?
A very true statement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2013, 05:33 AM
 
Location: Oklahoma City
793 posts, read 1,111,769 times
Reputation: 907
Oklahoma City and Tulsa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,972,699 times
Reputation: 5813
Ohio

Columbus
Cincinnati
Cleveland

All are right around 2 million

Then you have Akron, Dayton, and Toledo fighting amongst the smaller cities, all of which have metros over 500,000.

Last edited by ColdAilment; 02-10-2013 at 04:25 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2013, 09:21 PM
 
Location: The South
848 posts, read 1,120,054 times
Reputation: 1007
North Carolina -- Charlotte vs. Raleigh vs. Durham vs. Greensboro vs. Winston-Salem
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2013, 10:33 PM
 
Location: Savannah, GA
4,582 posts, read 8,971,139 times
Reputation: 2421
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepless in Bham View Post
And even that should be in question. I think this state would be better served if the state capital was in Birmingham.
As corrupt as the Birmingham government is, I don't think so!

Honestly, the capital would probably fit best in either Huntsville, Tuscaloosa or Auburn. A place where the population is young, educated and more politically centered.

As far as rivalries go, I can't believe someone even mentioned Birmingham vs. Montgomery. That person clearly hasn't been to either city or perhaps even the state of Alabama before!
Seems as though every other mid-sized city in Alabama (Huntsville, Mobile, Montgomery) are trying to catch up to Birmingham.

In Georgia, it's Augusta, Savannah, Columbus and Macon "battling" with each other for 2nd place below Atlanta.

South Carolina, Greenville vs. Columbia vs. Charleston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2013, 11:00 PM
 
Location: Metro Birmingham, AL
1,672 posts, read 2,878,205 times
Reputation: 1246
Quote:
Originally Posted by WanderingImport View Post
As corrupt as the Birmingham government is, I don't think so!

Honestly, the capital would probably fit best in either Huntsville, Tuscaloosa or Auburn. A place where the population is young, educated and more politically centered.

As far as rivalries go, I can't believe someone even mentioned Birmingham vs. Montgomery. That person clearly hasn't been to either city or perhaps even the state of Alabama before!
Seems as though every other mid-sized city in Alabama (Huntsville, Mobile, Montgomery) are trying to catch up to Birmingham.

In Georgia, it's Augusta, Savannah, Columbus and Macon "battling" with each other for 2nd place below Atlanta.

South Carolina, Greenville vs. Columbia vs. Charleston.
Huntsville was the state capital from 1819-1820. Tuscaloosa from 1826-1846 and Montgomery 1847-current.

It would of been better if would of stayed in either Huntsville or Tuscaloosa.

Montgomery was probably a great choice in the 1800's, but in the 21st century not so much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2013, 12:36 AM
 
Location: Savannah, GA
4,582 posts, read 8,971,139 times
Reputation: 2421
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepless in Bham View Post
Huntsville was the state capital from 1819-1820. Tuscaloosa from 1826-1846 and Montgomery 1847-current.

It would of been better if would of stayed in either Huntsville or Tuscaloosa.

Montgomery was probably a great choice in the 1800's, but in the 21st century not so much.
Montgomery certainly has its cons, but tell me your reasons as to why the city isn't a good fit as capital of Alabama?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2013, 08:33 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
1,580 posts, read 2,897,804 times
Reputation: 1717
I lived in Alabama for several years. It has been a long time, but I still keep up with the state and have family there.

My impression has always been that Birmingham is far and away the "top dog" in the state, even though it has a lot of problems (economically and historically/culturally. When I was there I felt like Montgomery and Mobile fought for the #2 spot with Huntsville a little further back. But IMO Huntsville has the best future and is now at least even with Montgomery and Mobile (possibly already even a little ahead of those two). Huntsville would have to do a lot of growing over many more decades to challenge Birmingham though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2013, 08:35 AM
 
Location: Metro Birmingham, AL
1,672 posts, read 2,878,205 times
Reputation: 1246
Quote:
Originally Posted by WanderingImport View Post
Montgomery certainly has its cons, but tell me your reasons as to why the city isn't a good fit as capital of Alabama?
Montgomery to me basically represents what wrong with Alabama today, little to no population/economic growth.

Montgomery isnt a mecca for any other industry other than state government.

Montgomery like Jackson, MS is like an overgrown town in the poorest region in the state.

The Birmingham metro has a 1/4 of the state population and most of this state's GDP is coming from the metro. What does Montgomery bring to the table??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top