Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which do you favor?
Raleigh-Durham 76 69.72%
Columbus 33 30.28%
Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-10-2022, 12:13 PM
 
27,187 posts, read 43,876,617 times
Reputation: 32234

Advertisements

Overlooked here is you're getting two distinct cities with different personalities (Raleigh and Durham) versus the one (Columbus). Raleigh and Durham are arguably on equal footing in terms of desirability with Raleigh the more white collar feel while Durham tends more progressive, artsy and less pretentious. Throw Chapel Hill-Carrboro into the mix and the Triangle really becomes much more diverse. Columbus seems much more one-dimensional (OSU withstanding) and if you will "vanilla" in comparison.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-10-2022, 01:50 PM
 
27,187 posts, read 43,876,617 times
Reputation: 32234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
Columbus is probably the closest thing to a Sunbelt city in the Midwest in terms of growth and new development. It's not experiencing breakneck growth like a lot of Sunbelt cities but it is above average and not even close to anemic.
Besides Cincinnati perhaps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2022, 01:58 PM
 
37,881 posts, read 41,910,477 times
Reputation: 27274
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle19125 View Post
Besides Cincinnati perhaps.
There's nothing Sunbelt-ish about Cincinnati in terms of growth and development.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2022, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Atlanta metro (Cobb County)
3,157 posts, read 2,206,134 times
Reputation: 4194
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle19125 View Post
Besides Cincinnati perhaps.
Indianapolis would be a better choice for a Midwest metro area (in addition to Columbus) with more Sunbelt-like development patterns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2022, 04:38 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,679 posts, read 9,380,908 times
Reputation: 7261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
There's nothing Sunbelt-ish about Cincinnati in terms of growth and development.
At all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jas75 View Post
Indianapolis would be a better choice for a Midwest metro area (in addition to Columbus) with more Sunbelt-like development patterns.
Now, there is certainly an argument for Indianapolis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2022, 07:00 PM
 
771 posts, read 624,859 times
Reputation: 1275
The sprawl between Cincinnati and Dayton might be Sun Belt-ish, but Columbus and Indianapolis are the best choices. Both of those cities were never industrial and gritty like Cleveland, Detroit, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2022, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Cincinnati
860 posts, read 1,356,991 times
Reputation: 1130
Quote:
Originally Posted by costellopresley82 View Post
The sprawl between Cincinnati and Dayton might be Sun Belt-ish, but Columbus and Indianapolis are the best choices. Both of those cities were never industrial and gritty like Cleveland, Detroit, etc.
You're going to think I sound crazy, but in the year 2022, Indianapolis is in the same tier of grittiness that Detroit and Cleveland are. Actually, I'd say Indy worse, because they didn't suffer to deindustrialization the way the others did. Instead, it was a complete lack of urban investment, white flight, and collapse of working class welfare that left a growing city, in a state worse than 90's Cincinnati. It's almost as if they incorporated the entire county, and forgot that the actual city exists. The neighborhoods near Butler-Tarkington (which is nice) literally look like Detroit, missing roofs and all. They also have horrible road infrastructure. Indy looks like a dying city with pockets of gentrification here and there. That city could add another MILLION people, and the place would look the exact same, there would just be a dozen more new exits off the freeway the further out you go.

Regarding Columbus vs The Triangle, Columbus is a far more dynamic city, and it's economy is pretty diverse as well. Now that my aunt lives in Raleigh I've been able to visit it alot, and they are truly transforming the downtown and core into an actual PLACE. I'm always impressed by the development down there, especially in the warehouse district (if that's even what it's called).It's a quiet city though.

These 2 metros are tied, but for different reasons. If you're a city person, Columbus comes out on top, but still offers plenty of family friendly suburbia.

If you're a suburban person, The Triangle comes out on top, but also has 3 unique smaller cities with their own scenes to chose from to get your urban fix. Interestingly enough, I could see transit being implemented here before Columbus.

I could live in either of these places.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2022, 08:45 AM
 
327 posts, read 222,013 times
Reputation: 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by jas75 View Post
Indianapolis would be a better choice for a Midwest metro area (in addition to Columbus) with more Sunbelt-like development patterns.
+Louisville and Lexington
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2022, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Shaker Heights, OH
5,294 posts, read 5,237,897 times
Reputation: 4363
Columbus has a better food/restaurant scene than Raleigh does imo.

Columbus has better summer climate but Raleigh has a better winter climate...that said at least 1 inch of snow doesn't completely shut down the city like it does to Raleigh...Columbus does have the equipment to clear streets.

Overall though, these 2 cities imo are so comparable, and I would be happy being in either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top