Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2014, 01:39 PM
 
3,569 posts, read 2,520,027 times
Reputation: 2290

Advertisements

New Ranking of Best U.S. Cities for Public Transit — Walk Score Blog

The top five are: NY, SF, Boston, D.C., and Philly.

My gut reaction is surprise that they rank NY and SF so closely (but that could be because outer burroughs
have less transit access). I'm also surprised to see D.C. as far back as it is, and Portland, OR behind both Seattle and Oakland.

What do you think?

http://www.walkscore.com/transit-sco...hodology.shtml

Last edited by TheCityTheBridge; 01-29-2014 at 01:40 PM.. Reason: Add link to detailed methodology
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2014, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,853,364 times
Reputation: 4049
I would move SF to 5, put DC at 2 and Chicago at 3.

Chicago is hurt by its large borders, it belongs in the top 5 for sure.

Last edited by munchitup; 01-29-2014 at 01:55 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 01:59 PM
 
1,526 posts, read 1,985,611 times
Reputation: 1529
Here are the Top 10 US cities with a population of 200,000+

New York
San Francisco
Boston
Washington D.C.
Philadelphia
Chicago
Minneapolis
Miami
Seattle
Baltimore
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,853,364 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by YIMBY View Post
Here are the Top 10 US cities with a population of 200,000+

New York
San Francisco
Boston
Washington D.C.
Philadelphia
Chicago
Minneapolis
Miami
Seattle
Baltimore
Some cities at the end of that list are really helped out by their small municipal boundaries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,515 posts, read 33,531,365 times
Reputation: 12152
I understand it but it's hard getting to that rider's paradise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:08 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,515 posts, read 33,531,365 times
Reputation: 12152
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
I would move SF to 5, put DC at 2 and Chicago at 3.

Chicago is hurt by its large borders, it belongs in the top 5 for sure.
You think it hurts Los Angeles too. I know it wouldn't make much difference but I think Houston would be higher if it was only the 95 sq.miles of the inner loop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,739,757 times
Reputation: 10592
Atlanta, Houston, and Dallas were right next to each other. No surprise there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:20 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,644,089 times
Reputation: 13630
I probably wouldn't weight light rail the same as heavy rail as it can be much slower in many cases, especially the case of SF. Not sure why ferry/cable car or other is weighted 1.5X too as they can be somewhat slow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,853,364 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
You think it hurts Los Angeles too. I know it wouldn't make much difference but I think Houston would be higher if it was only the 95 sq.miles of the inner loop.
I do but I think that its place at #9 isn't that far off - and I think Chicago is hurt worse in the ranking than LA is.

I think overall this score weights "trendy" transit like rail and streetcars too much. Sure there is a small subsection of elitists/urbanistas who will not take a bus, but the majority of transit trips in most (maybe all?) metros are on buses.

As far as LRT vs. Heavy rail - it really depends on the line, not all LRT is built the same. The Green Line in LA is completely grade separated and might as well be heavy rail, and many (but not enough) sections of LA's LRT system is grade separated. Other LRT lines like MUNI are mostly street running and shouldn't be counted as high. There are a lot of variables with LRT so it makes it hard to really build into an equation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:25 PM
 
215 posts, read 379,028 times
Reputation: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterlemonjello View Post
Atlanta, Houston, and Dallas were right next to each other. No surprise there.
All 3 belong at the bottom of the list......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top