Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Best North American Olympic Host City
Vancouver 16 16.84%
Salt Lake City 12 12.63%
Atlanta 13 13.68%
Calgary 1 1.05%
Los Angeles 34 35.79%
Lake Placid 9 9.47%
Montreal 7 7.37%
Mexico City 3 3.16%
Squaw Valley 0 0%
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-08-2014, 06:13 PM
 
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
5,888 posts, read 13,003,171 times
Reputation: 3974

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DevanXL View Post
How many stadiums (over 30,000) do you think a city would need for an Olympics especially with the addition of rugby and possibly football.
American Football will never ever be included as an Olympic Sport. Its only popular in the US, and semi popular in Canada.

Besides, for Stadium Sports, they will spread out the tournament play to various regional cities.
The Atlanta Olympics Football (soccer) tounnament was played played in DC, Florida. Alabama, Georgia and Texas. The LA Olympics saw tournament play in Boston, Annapolis, the Bay Area and Pasadena.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2014, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
5,888 posts, read 13,003,171 times
Reputation: 3974
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
This is the United States. We could host an Olympics anywhere if we had to, in our sleep. And they would be incredible.
Because Atlanta did such a stellar job...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2014, 06:23 PM
 
72,981 posts, read 62,569,376 times
Reputation: 21878
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
Vancouver was a terrible location for the Winter Olympics. Not sure how you can pick a host city that barely gets any snow and isn't even that cold. Sochi is even worse.
Well, perhaps a geographic perspective is necessary.

Sochi and Vancouver: A Parallel in Olympic Geography | Geoawesomeness

Snow magic amid subtropics: Rosa Khutor to host Olympic ski battles - Video



2014 Winter Olympics, the Geographic Perspective - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2014, 06:35 PM
 
Location: Atlanta ,GA
9,067 posts, read 15,788,575 times
Reputation: 2980
Quote:
Originally Posted by DinsdalePirahna View Post
Because Atlanta did such a stellar job...
Atlanta acheived all its goals.It broke all kinds of sponsorship records and was one of the most profitable.So yes.Atlanta did a stellar job.Ask Montrealenders how they feel about having the Olympics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2014, 06:43 PM
 
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
5,888 posts, read 13,003,171 times
Reputation: 3974
Montreal is a Canadian city. The comment was "This is the United States. We could host an Olympics anywhere if we had to, in our sleep. And they would be incredible."

Atlanta was crass commercialism
the LOC was dysfunctional
The athletes transit system was a mess
The bombing didn't help
and IZZY (or whatizit)

I have quite a few friends that competed there. They were less than impressed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2014, 06:44 PM
 
Location: Georgia
4,209 posts, read 4,742,373 times
Reputation: 3626
Quote:
Originally Posted by DinsdalePirahna View Post
Because Atlanta did such a stellar job...
Atlanta's Olympic legacy | Cover Story | Creative Loafing Atlanta
What was that again?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2014, 06:48 PM
 
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
5,888 posts, read 13,003,171 times
Reputation: 3974
Quote:
Originally Posted by demonta4 View Post
Homer Newslink
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2014, 07:07 PM
 
Location: Atlanta ,GA
9,067 posts, read 15,788,575 times
Reputation: 2980
Quote:
Originally Posted by DinsdalePirahna View Post
Montreal is a Canadian city. The comment was "This is the United States. We could host an Olympics anywhere if we had to, in our sleep. And they would be incredible."

Atlanta was crass commercialism
the LOC was dysfunctional
The athletes transit system was a mess
The bombing didn't help
and IZZY (or whatizit)

I have quite a few friends that competed there. They were less than impressed.
Im aware.My point was that I'd rather have an Olympics were it was a finacial success than a burden of 30 years that nearly bankrupted a city.

I was here during the Olympics and it was not nearly as bad as SOME people say it was that were not there.

Compare an Olympics to Baercelona or London,then yes I would be less than impressed also.

In my opinion the games arre just as commecial as ever.In fact I think many games have followed suit since Atlanta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2014, 07:44 PM
 
Location: PNW
2,011 posts, read 3,459,220 times
Reputation: 1403
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Athens is no better prepared than New Orleans.

This is the United States. We could host an Olympics anywhere if we had to, in our sleep. And they would be incredible.
I wouldn't say every us city could. The federal Gorvernment doesn't invest into Olympic Games unlike most other countries. This gives us a disadvantage unless you have alot of private money like Atlanta did with Coca Cola in 1996.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DinsdalePirahna View Post
American Football will never ever be included as an Olympic Sport. Its only popular in the US, and semi popular in Canada.

Besides, for Stadium Sports, they will spread out the tournament play to various regional cities.
The Atlanta Olympics Football (soccer) tounnament was played played in DC, Florida. Alabama, Georgia and Texas. The LA Olympics saw tournament play in Boston, Annapolis, the Bay Area and Pasadena.
I don't think it's good to spread out the venues anymore. People spend alot of money traveling to that city to see the games. Having an event happen in la if the game was hosted by Seattle it defeats the purpose, atleast keep in the region. Of purse soccer regionals isn't that big of a deal in terms of the Olympics but my host cities should aim to keep it in the region.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2014, 07:50 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,980 posts, read 32,634,523 times
Reputation: 13630
Just because you can hold a Winter Olympics doesn't necessarily mean you should. Didn't think they could pick a worse choice for a Winter Olympics than Vancouver but I was wrong lol. At least the next host city will actually have a real winter climate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top