Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city is the next / 2nd NYC?
San Francisco 52 57.14%
Philadelphia 39 42.86%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-18-2014, 06:58 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
5,294 posts, read 10,203,482 times
Reputation: 2136

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by West Coast Republican View Post
Neither of these. One could argue that maybe LA, Dallas, Atlanta, or Miami might become a competitor to NYC one day as these have the fastest growing metro areas (well except maybe LA, people are fleeing California in massive droves like the plague, can't say I blame them). However I don't think they'll ever get to NYC level, I don't think any city will to be honest.
People are also still spilling into LA and San Diego at a fast rate though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-18-2014, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
2,098 posts, read 3,523,673 times
Reputation: 998
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNigh View Post
San Francisco claims to be 2nd to none, the NYC of the west. However Philly has been known as the 6th borough. Which city is really in line to be the 2nd NYC?
Yeah maybe on city data SF is claimed to be the NYC of the west. However, get off these boards and mention this to normal people and they will think you are mildly retarded.

Regarding all cities on the west coast, they are nothing like NYC. Philly is not a good comparison to NYC either. Most would go with DC or BOS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2014, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 12,993,036 times
Reputation: 5766
While all three cities have their uniqueness, there's no question that New York City's outer boroughs have more in common with Philadelphia than it does with San Francisco. Manhattan only represents a small percentage of the total population of the city. Even with that being said, I think Center City comes the closest in feel to Manhattan especially at the street level when compared to downtown San Francisco. Philly also seems to give off more of a stand-alone "big city vibe" that you see with cities like NYC and Chicago. San Francisco while large, feels more like a complementary city along with other nearby cities like San Jose and Oakland.

Manhattan
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7536...-pqwuebkJg!2e0

Center City, Philadelphia
https://www.google.com/maps/@39.9528...1UXoToQ1Lg!2e0

Downtown San Francisco
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.7935...AoL8XGM1SA!2e0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2014, 01:32 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,689,925 times
Reputation: 3668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freshflakes757 View Post
Yeah maybe on city data SF is claimed to be the NYC of the west. However, get off these boards and mention this to normal people and they will think you are mildly retarded.

Regarding all cities on the west coast, they are nothing like NYC. Philly is not a good comparison to NYC either. Most would go with DC or BOS.
LOLOLOL. DC and Boston are nothing like NYC. Philly is the closest in LOOK to NYC - which is why there are comparisons made.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2014, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,689,925 times
Reputation: 3668
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
Philly also seems to give off more of a stand-alone "big city vibe" that you see with cities like NYC and Chicago. San Francisco while large, feels more like a complementary city along with other nearby cities like San Jose and Oakland.
Oh s**t... them's fighting words. Prepare for a war now with SF posters posting several links about GDP, wealth, and how some San Francisco newspaper/magazine thinks SF is "Manhattanizing"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2014, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
2,098 posts, read 3,523,673 times
Reputation: 998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343 View Post
LOLOLOL. DC and Boston are nothing like NYC. Philly is the closest in LOOK to NYC - which is why there are comparisons made.
Who cares? I don't think people from PHL even want to be compared with the stuck up mentality of NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2014, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 12,993,036 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343 View Post
Prepare for a war now with SF posters posting several links about GDP, wealth, and how some San Francisco newspaper/magazine thinks SF is "Manhattanizing"
lol. As if those things really have anything to do with what cities have in common. Cities like London and Tokyo have similar GDP and wealth to NYC than any other US city but that doesn't automatically mean those cities have a lot in common in NYC.

Of course Philly and New York City have their differences but I don't see how a city that's about 3,000 miles away would have more in common with NYC than a city that is only 90 miles away. NYC and Philly have shared history that goes back long before the founding of San Francisco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2014, 02:15 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 12,993,036 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freshflakes757 View Post
Who cares? I don't think people from PHL even want to be compared with the stuck up mentality of NYC.
It's not so much about Philly wanting to be compared to NYC but more of about which of these two cities(Philly, SF) have more in common with NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2014, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 12,993,036 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343 View Post
Oh s**t... them's fighting words.
Realistically, Philly is more of a stand-alone city in it's metropolis. Just as Chicago is the undisputed king of Chicagoland and NYC is the undisputed king of the Tri-state area. When it comes to San Francisco and the Bay Area, not so much. San Francisco has to share the spotlight with Oakland and San Jose. I had to laugh when some of the posters said that San Francisco has more in common with NYC when it comes to power. Really? How can someone say that San Francisco has more similarities to NYC in power when SF can't even be a stand alone city in its own metropolis. At least be able to dominate your own metro area before you can say you have similarities with NYC when it comes to power and influence. People can say what you want about Philly but at least Philly dominates it's metro area and no other city is considered its equal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2014, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229
Quote:
How can someone say that San Francisco has more similarities to NYC in power when SF can't even be a stand alone city in its own metropolis.
I dont know but perhaps you should direct this query to New York Magazine since they made the following statement:

It’s hard to pinpoint the exact moment that
San Francisco morphed into bizarro-world
New York, when it went from being the
city’s dorky, behoodied West Coast cousin
to being, in many ways, more New York–ish
than New York itself—its wealth more
impressive, its infatuation with power and
status more blinding. Maybe it was this past
November, when New York elected a tax-the-rich progressive as mayor and, two
days later, Twitter, a company that had been
courted by San Francisco politicians with a
Bloombergian combination of municipal tax
breaks and mayoral flattery, went public at
around a $25 billion valuation. Maybe it was
when, after the crash, bonus-starved Wall
Street bankers started quitting their jobs
and heading to the Bay Area in droves to
join the start-up gold rush. Or maybe it was
when San Francisco became the new
American capital of real-estate kvetching,
thanks to supra-Manhattan rents and
gentrification at a pace that would make
Bushwick blush...


Quote:
At least be able to dominate your own metro area before you can say you have similarities with NYC when it comes to power and influence. People can say what you want about Philly but at least Philly dominates it's metro area
Actually Philadelphia does NOT dominate every aspect of life in its region like SF does.

Because King of Prussia OWNS the Delaware Valley when it comes to shopping, dear.

Also, Philadelphia rarely appears on rankings of global power perhaps because the region it "dominates"(snickers) isnt very important.

food for thought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top