Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Best City for College Football?
Atlanta 43 45.26%
Boston 2 2.11%
Chicago 4 4.21%
Dallas 7 7.37%
Houston 6 6.32%
Los Angeles 27 28.42%
San Francisco 0 0%
Seattle 6 6.32%
Washington DC 0 0%
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-09-2014, 03:13 PM
 
8,276 posts, read 11,954,927 times
Reputation: 10080

Advertisements

I'm surprised that Boston has even 2 votes. Outside of a few Boston College fanatics, no one cares about college football in Boston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-09-2014, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Louisville
5,300 posts, read 6,104,627 times
Reputation: 9659
Quote:
Originally Posted by MassVt View Post
I'm surprised that Boston has even 2 votes. Outside of a few Boston College fanatics, no one cares about college football in Boston.
The OP didn't pick logical cities, they opted for "sexy" cities instead. Tho that shouldn't suprise anyone as there are more than a few posters who see the country through the prism of about 8 places.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2014, 04:50 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,529 posts, read 33,635,677 times
Reputation: 12187
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmac9wr View Post
Yea but I thought the idea of the thread was talking about the blend of team support...not necessarily supporting teams play in that particular city. If we're going solely by teams that play in the city, then yea I guess you could say LA since it's the only city with two major teams in the city.

However, when comparing cities with the best blends of teams & overall passion for the sport, there's no question that Atlanta is the right call. Atlanta's got a huge blend of teams from the SEC & ACC. You'll get fans from Georgia, Georgia Tech, Auburn, Clemson, Alabama, Tennessee, South Carolina, among several others. It's the capital of college football in this country, no doubt.

A surprising #2 in my opinion is Washington DC. I wasn't expecting it, but ran into tons of B1G fans at bars there...especially Penn State and Ohio State.
Yeah but DC doesn't care about college football like that. Dallas would be 2nd because they have tons of Big 12, BIG,SEC fans as well. Arkansas and LSU fans are all over DFW. The Terrapins are only popular when it comes to basketball and VA Tech is so far away from here that it barely registers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2014, 07:36 AM
 
Location: Denver
6,625 posts, read 14,489,024 times
Reputation: 4202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
Yeah but DC doesn't care about college football like that. Dallas would be 2nd because they have tons of Big 12, BIG,SEC fans as well. Arkansas and LSU fans are all over DFW. The Terrapins are only popular when it comes to basketball and VA Tech is so far away from here that it barely registers.
True...I've never been to DFW but I would imagine it's a big college football town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2014, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Cleveland and Columbus OH
11,077 posts, read 12,513,629 times
Reputation: 10425
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjlo View Post
The OP didn't pick logical cities, they opted for "sexy" cities instead. Tho that shouldn't suprise anyone as there are more than a few posters who see the country through the prism of about 8 places.
True. If these were at all a serious thread, the city choices would be more like Columbus, Austin, Ann Arbor, Baton Rouge, etc. Asking what major large city is best for college football is a dumb question, because none of them really have college football in their dna like some of the more mid sized cities do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2014, 09:33 AM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,957,143 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjimmy24 View Post
True. If these were at all a serious thread, the city choices would be more like Columbus, Austin, Ann Arbor, Baton Rouge, etc. Asking what major large city is best for college football is a dumb question, because none of them really have college football in their dna like some of the more mid sized cities do.
I wouldn't say NONE, but yes, it would be a better list if it were more mid-sized cities (even though Austin and Columbus are both two top 20 largest cities) because they tend to not have any major pro sports teams to compete with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2014, 09:47 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 39,030,750 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Illusive Man View Post
UCLA is in the conversation and always will be. They do fill their stadium pretty consistently, which is pretty amazing considering how rough the commute to Pasadena from LA can actually be. If UCLA's stadium was near or around westwood, they would always sell out.

That's true, most of the city doesn't care about gameday, but the percentage that does is still pretty massive.
then what about a place like Happy Valley in the middle of no where and gets 110K every weekend
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2014, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Cleveland and Columbus OH
11,077 posts, read 12,513,629 times
Reputation: 10425
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJG View Post
I wouldn't say NONE, but yes, it would be a better list if it were more mid-sized cities (even though Austin and Columbus are both two top 20 largest cities) because they tend to not have any major pro sports teams to compete with.
Columbus and Austin have massive borders which give the illusion of largeness. The Columbus metro area of 2 million is nothing compared to Boston at 4.5 million, even though The city population is 100,000 more than Boston. Keep in mind, a lot of the major cities have very small borders and are very dense, whereas Austin and Columbus are in reality much much less populated than any of the cities on the list. "Mid sized" is a much more accurate term for such places.

And I still disagree. Atlanta might have the biggest college football following, but it still doesn't compare to Columbus or Tuscaloosa even.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2014, 10:07 AM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,957,143 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjimmy24 View Post
Columbus and Austin have massive borders which give the illusion of largeness. The Columbus metro area of 2 million is nothing compared to Boston at 4.5 million, even though The city population is 100,000 more than Boston. Keep in mind, a lot of the major cities have very small borders and are very dense, whereas Austin and Columbus are in reality much much less populated than any of the cities on the list. "Mid sized" is a much more accurate term for such places.
You're going to have to be more specific.

You didn't say "metro", just "city". So one will most likely assume you're just talking about the city itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2014, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Cleveland and Columbus OH
11,077 posts, read 12,513,629 times
Reputation: 10425
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJG View Post
You're going to have to be more specific.

You didn't say "metro", just "city". So one will most likely assume you're just talking about the city itself.
It's ridiculous to view things by city proper, for stuff like this. It's just not the same thing. I figured everyone would already be on the same page here... You can live .3 miles from downtown Boston and not live in Boston. It would be really ludicrous to claim that doesn't count. Whereas you could live 15 miles from downtown Austin and still live in Austin. Arbitrary lines drawn long ago and maintained pointless politics dont tell you much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top