Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2014, 11:45 AM
 
5,365 posts, read 6,361,222 times
Reputation: 3360

Advertisements

How about Houston? It's CSA GDP is higher than Boston's despite having a million fewer people.

Atlanta underperforms. Having less GDP in ranking than its population ranking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2014, 11:46 AM
 
14,798 posts, read 17,774,024 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlajos View Post
Interesting looking at real GDP growth over the last 5 years of some of my favorite cities in the US. Average real GDP from 2009-2013:

NYC - 1.24%
LA - (0.24%)
Chicago - 0.5%
Philly - 0.5%
SF - 1.0%
LA has not yet recovered from the great recession. Certainly will this year.

Sorry, I forgot Boston, it averaged 1.7% over the last five years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Watching half my country turn into Gilead
3,530 posts, read 4,201,943 times
Reputation: 2925
Will MSP surpass Detroit in CSA GDP in the near future? Didn't realize it already has a higher MSA GDP
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 12:01 PM
 
5,365 posts, read 6,361,222 times
Reputation: 3360
Houston CSA will pass Chicago in GDP this decade I think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 12:12 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,400,818 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by CravingMountains View Post
Houston CSA will pass Chicago in GDP this decade I think.
It's possible. Maybe not this decade, but almost certainly the next one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Detroit
3,671 posts, read 5,915,531 times
Reputation: 2692
Quote:
Originally Posted by qworldorder View Post
Will MSP surpass Detroit in CSA GDP in the near future? Didn't realize it already has a higher MSA GDP
I'm still trying to find numbers for 2012 because I'm unsure as well. Detroit was the hardest hit during the recession so it's still recovering, Detroit wasn't even in the 200 billions a few years ago, that just goes to show how hard the great recession hit. But if Metro Detroit happens to pick up Washtenaw county this decade then probably not. Regardless of if it does or not, Minneapolis punches well above it's weight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
456 posts, read 777,542 times
Reputation: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS313 View Post
I'm still trying to find numbers for 2012 because I'm unsure as well. Detroit was the hardest hit during the recession so it's still recovering, Detroit wasn't even in the 200 billions a few years ago, that just goes to show how hard the great recession hit. But if Metro Detroit happens to pick up Washtenaw county this decade then probably not. Regardless of if it does or not, Minneapolis punches well above it's weight.
http://bea.gov/newsreleases/regional..._metro0914.pdf has all the data including growth rates and numbers back 5 years. However, I'm not actually seeing exactly the same numbers in these charts as the OP originally printed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,474 posts, read 5,750,618 times
Reputation: 6120
Quote:
Originally Posted by CravingMountains View Post
How about Houston? It's CSA GDP is higher than Boston's despite having a million fewer people.
Not sure of the methodology, but do they include all of the oil from the gulf into Houston's GDP or something? Otherwise Houston's numbers make it top5 richest places on the planet, above Switzerland, Bay Area, NYC, etc... For example, the difference between Houston and Dallas is like $10,000 per capita, which is crazy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Michigan
4,647 posts, read 8,635,678 times
Reputation: 3776
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS313 View Post
I'm still trying to find numbers for 2012 because I'm unsure as well. Detroit was the hardest hit during the recession so it's still recovering, Detroit wasn't even in the 200 billions a few years ago, that just goes to show how hard the great recession hit. But if Metro Detroit happens to pick up Washtenaw county this decade then probably not. Regardless of if it does or not, Minneapolis punches well above it's weight.
Detroit and the Twins seem to be battling for the same spot post-recession.



If you go to 'interactive tables' on the right side of OP's link, it shows you the past years for every metro. You just have to hand select which metros you want to see and whether you only want totals or all the data. Though I don't think they have CSA data (or at least I didn't notice if there was).

http://bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?req...step=1&isuri=1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,699 posts, read 67,770,976 times
Reputation: 21282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhymes with Best Coast View Post
LA at $1 Trillion is monumental.

Also glad to see the Bay Area inching closer to the Trillion dollar club. We should be there in about less than a decade or so.

Also great news to see Houston and Boston breaking the $500 Million club.

Seattle leapfrogging Miami in its diametric opposite part of the country was expected.

All in all, the West looks to be well represented and positioned to move forward as we have several beasts chomping at the heels of the old guard. Still, impressive gains from the top down.

Can't wait to see the individual breakdowns for each.

Good work, All!
The Inner Bay Area is really on a torrent right now, and has probably already eclipsed the Chicago MSA by now, which is astounding cause we're talking about 3 million less people.

San Francisco & San Jose MSAs
2013 Population: 6,435,917
2013 GDP: $585.101 Billion
2013 Per Capita GDP: $90,511

San Jose Per Capita GDP: $102,530
San Francisco Per Capita GDP: $85,970

SF+San Mateo+Marin, when separated from the East Bay is most likely well over $100,000
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top