Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-21-2014, 10:11 PM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,982,700 times
Reputation: 5813

Advertisements

After checking out the metro GDP of some major American cities I have to admit I was a little shocked at how highly ranked Indianapolis Indiana is.

The Indianapolis Metro GDP is higher than several other cities which are larger than it or roughly the same size.

Indianapolis has a higher GDP than:

Cleveland Ohio
Columbus Ohio
Cincinnati Ohio
Kansas City Missouri/Kansas
Tampa Florida
Las Vegas Nevada
Austin Texas
Orlando Florida

How is Indianapolis beating all of these cities? Especially places like Orlando, Tampa, Austin, and Las Vegas? Indianapolis Metro is SMALLER than all of those cities with the exception of Austin, Austin is pretty much the exact same size right now, albeit growing more quickly.

Check out the stats here:

List of U.S. metropolitan areas by GDP - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-22-2014, 04:30 AM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,646 posts, read 16,040,657 times
Reputation: 5286
A bigger surprise to me is Houston above D.C. and Philly above Boston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 05:06 AM
Status: "Freell" (set 10 days ago)
 
Location: Closer than you think!
2,856 posts, read 4,623,275 times
Reputation: 3138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davy-040 View Post
A bigger surprise to me is Houston above D.C. and Philly above Boston.
The only one that really could surprise anyone is D.C. Houston's economy is centered around energy which would explain why SF and Houston are increases at rates in which their peer cities envy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Denver
6,625 posts, read 14,466,386 times
Reputation: 4201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davy-040 View Post
A bigger surprise to me is Houston above D.C. and Philly above Boston.
Why would that surprise you? Look at their MSA populations:

Houston: 6,313,158
Philadelphia: 6,034,678
Washington DC: 5,949,859
Boston: 4,684,299

On a per capita basis, Houston is the strongest with $81,950 followed by Boston with $79,151 then DC $77,972 and Philadelphia $63,532.

Houston's growth in physically and economically has been extremely impressive the past few years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Louisville
5,299 posts, read 6,072,422 times
Reputation: 9653
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmac9wr View Post
Why would that surprise you? Look at their MSA populations:

Houston: 6,313,158
Philadelphia: 6,034,678
Washington DC: 5,949,859
Boston: 4,684,299

On a per capita basis, Houston is the strongest with $81,950 followed by Boston with $79,151 then DC $77,972 and Philadelphia $63,532.

Houston's growth in physically and economically has been extremely impressive the past few years.
Haha the surprise probably comes from the unwritten rule about not saying nice things about cities from Texas that aren't named Austin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,464 posts, read 5,714,595 times
Reputation: 6098
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmac9wr View Post
Houston's growth in physically and economically has been extremely impressive the past few years.
As I said before, I am pretty sure they count the oil from the Gulf as part of Houston area GDP. Similar to how Alberta with their oil sands has the same GDP as Quebec, which is almost twice more populous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Louisville
5,299 posts, read 6,072,422 times
Reputation: 9653
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
As I said before, I am pretty sure they count the oil from the Gulf as part of Houston area GDP.
As long as the money for that oil exchanges with Houston based hands they will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 08:07 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,464 posts, read 5,714,595 times
Reputation: 6098
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjlo View Post
As long as the money for that oil exchanges with Houston based hands they will.
Yes, but you have to take GDP stats of natural resource producing regions with a grain of salt. The people there aren't more productive/may not even see that money, since they are just digging stuff from the ground that happens to be on their towns' administrative territory. Another good example is Equatorial Guinea, that has GDP per capita similar to countries like South Korea. Oil workers can get paid relatively well, but they are pumping much more in $ value. Each oil worker, on average, pumps billions of $ worth of oil a year, they sure as hell do not see that money, but it counts towards GDP. A refinery worker in Houston can "produce" more GDP than Bill Gates or Warren Buffet.

Last edited by Gantz; 10-22-2014 at 08:19 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 08:28 AM
 
Location: Louisville
5,299 posts, read 6,072,422 times
Reputation: 9653
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
Yes, but you have to take GDP stats of natural resource producing regions with a grain of salt. The people there aren't more productive/may not even see that money, since they are just digging stuff from the ground that happens to be on their towns' administrative territory. Another good example is Equatorial Guinea, that has GDP per capita similar to countries like South Korea. Oil workers can get paid relatively well, but they are pumping much more in $ value. Each oil worker, on average, pumps billions of $ worth of oil a year, they sure as hell do not see that money, but it counts towards GDP. A refinery worker in Houston can "produce" more GDP than Bill Gates or Warren Buffet.
I have a feeling the situation in the Houston MSP is not THAT comparable to Equatorial Guinea, and all of Alberta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 08:29 AM
 
Location: Denver
6,625 posts, read 14,466,386 times
Reputation: 4201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
Yes, but you have to take GDP stats of natural resource producing regions with a grain of salt. The people there aren't more productive/may not even see that money, since they are just digging stuff from the ground that happens to be on their towns' administrative territory. Another good example is Equatorial Guinea, that has GDP per capita similar to countries like South Korea. Oil workers can get paid relatively well, but they are pumping much more in $ value. Each oil worker, on average, pumps billions of $ worth of oil a year, they sure as hell do not see that money, but it counts towards GDP. A refinery worker in Houston can "produce" more GDP than Bill Gates or Warren Buffet.
That's true. Here's the median household income of those four MSAs in 2012:

Washington DC: $88,505 (thank you runaway government spending)
Boston: $70,699
Philadelphia: $59,631
Houston: $55,806

It should definitely be noted that GDP, while a solid measurement, does not tell the whole story of economic power & influence. It doesn't measure things such as assets under management, medical research, or other factors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top