Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-27-2015, 03:00 PM
 
Location: Nashville TN
4,918 posts, read 6,467,718 times
Reputation: 4778

Advertisements

People on here get so mad over the most minor of issues, I love Americans. You guys make me laugh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2015, 03:02 PM
 
3,147 posts, read 3,501,513 times
Reputation: 1873
Quote:
Originally Posted by SK115 View Post
They didn't lose any argument. This thread is about which non-traditional cities should get a chance to host the super bowl. Green Bay does not have the infrastructure to handle such a large-scale event. The only thing standing in the way of Denver getting a super bowl is the fact that their stadium lacks a dome/retractable roof. I have no ties to either city, I'm just being realistic.

The OP actually specifically asked for open stadiums like the NYC game. Of all the "Non-traditional" Super Bowl cities with open stadiums, I would argue Denver would be top 3 on that short list. Along with Century Link and maybe Kansas City.

You are right though, Any of those cities become more likely with a roof.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 03:07 PM
 
3,147 posts, read 3,501,513 times
Reputation: 1873
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKWildcat1981 View Post
People on here get so mad over the most minor of issues, I love Americans. You guys make me laugh.
I love you too.




But yes, sports can be a heated topic here. I thought soccer was the same way in the UK?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 05:24 PM
 
1,461 posts, read 2,109,900 times
Reputation: 1036
UK = University of Kentucky fyi
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 05:51 PM
 
3,147 posts, read 3,501,513 times
Reputation: 1873
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadicalAtheist View Post
UK = University of Kentucky fyi
That is what I was assuming, but I thought it might have a double meaning because of the "I love Americans." comment.

Doesn't sound like something somebody from Kentucky would say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 06:00 PM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
23,766 posts, read 29,048,781 times
Reputation: 37337
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKWildcat1981 View Post
People on here get so mad over the most minor of issues, I love Americans. You guys make me laugh.
oh, what...we're here to amuse you?









https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWIN...-ts=1422327029
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 06:12 PM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,952,147 times
Reputation: 3545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xander_Crews View Post
That is what I was assuming, but I thought it might have a double meaning because of the "I love Americans." comment.

Doesn't sound like something somebody from Kentucky would say.
Yeah because no one from another country would attend the University of Kentucky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 06:19 PM
 
3,147 posts, read 3,501,513 times
Reputation: 1873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trae713 View Post
Yeah because no one from another country would attend the University of Kentucky.
Ugh, read. I clearly said that my FIRST assumption was that it did indeed mean U of K, I then thought there was a possibility of a double meaning.

Can people from the UK not attend U of K?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 06:22 PM
 
6,843 posts, read 10,961,697 times
Reputation: 8436
Two cities I literally despised just two months ago but have become two of my favorites in North America (although no where close to how much I love New York or Miami); San Francisco and Houston.

Oh wait, they are hosting the next two Superbowls, what do you know, awesome.

Nothing against Dallas, I quite like that city a lot too, but don't ever give the Superbowl back to them. The setup, which is essentially ziplining across the Metroplex from Dallas to Fort Worth and everything in between in a car or through TRE (commuter rail) is just inefficient. Either give the activities to Dallas or give it to Fort Worth, don't give the Metroplex another Superbowl until they figure that out, please!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 07:25 PM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,898,942 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red John View Post

Either give the activities to Dallas or give it to Fort Worth...
Heh... good luck with that one.

And this isn't the first time the San Francisco Bay Area and Houston will host.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top