Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
^ Yes, it doesn't have zero art. However, compared to Chicago in pretty much all those categories whether it's arts, theatre, food, etc - it's not going to come out ahead.
Few cities (besides NYC, LA, and SF) can out do Chicago's arts and theatre scene. Food is so subjective, for Sacramento's size its got a great foodie scene, street and regular food is up there. Slavic, eastern european restaurants, few other cities out do Chicago.
Sac reminded me of a giant suburb. It wasnt bad by any sense, but Chicago and its suburbs just offer more. To think otherwise is bizarre.
It's an usual comparison, Chicago is an enormous powerhouse of a city with a long history as a big city. Sacramento is a medium size city and it's metro, last census, was barely over 2million.
Sacramento certainly has a more interesting core than Phoenix which is twice the size of Sacramento both city and metro.
Yeah if you can manage to drive 80mph the entire way....
Going to SF from SAC, if we leave before 10am on Sat/Sun, 1 hour 10-15 minutes, Coming home after 8 or 9pm, easily done in 1hour, 5-15mins. That would be Bay Bridge(SF side) to Sacramento River Bridge.
Luckily I haven't been stuck in heavy traffic in a long time, worse case I think was just over 2hours for me; because of traffic from Berkeley to Bay Bridge, on I-80.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.