Anyhow to answer the guy's questions:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueRedTide
Based on
-American and International Influence
-Fame and Name Recognition
-Rising Economic Prosperity
|
1. For "American and International Influence" it is easily San Diego since it has a sisterhood with a city actually on foreign soil. That automatically puts it on notice versus Denver, Phoenix, and Portland. San Diego finishes up the job, it's composition diversity is more foreign born and globally oriented than any of those three anyway, and I easily argue Las Vegas has far more global outreach in many of the same ways and some different ones too over Denver, Phoenix, and Portland. Easy, San Diego 1, probably Denver and Phoenix tie for 2, and Portland a close 3rd. If you include Las Vegas, then its likely San Diego and Las Vegas 1, Denver and Phoenix 2, and Portland 3rd.
2. For "Fame and Name Recognition" it is easily Las Vegas. It occupies an entire tier for itself on this metric. It's substantiated as it easily pours in the most tourist dollars and invites in the most tourists of any of these cities. After that it is San Diego. People know of the San Diego Zoo, Sea World, Legoland, La Jolla Cove, the golf courses, the beaches, Bolboa Park, Comic Con, so on and so forth. Right behind San Diego, more than likely Denver. Its been making a name for itself since the legalization of Marijuana, it has a widely noted brewscene, so on and so forth. Portland is likely the most known afterwards, just edging out Phoenix.
3. For "Rising economic prosperity" I assume this means overall economic and income growth? Income is a necessary tool for prosperity and the rising economic conditions could probably factor into it.
Overall nominal Gross Domestic Product percentage growth (2008 - 2013):
01. Portland: + 24.04%
02. Houston: + 23.97%
03. Dallas/Fort Worth: + 18.61%
04. Seattle: + 16.87%
05. Denver: + 16.65%
06. Minneapolis/Saint Paul: + 15.91%
07. San Francisco Bay Area: + 15.88%
08. Boston: + 15.61%
09. New York: + 14.16%
10. Washington DC/Baltimore: + 14.00%
11. San Diego: + 12.04%
12. Chicago: + 11.62%
13. Philadelphia: + 10.75%
14. Atlanta: + 10.61%
15. Detroit: + 10.21%
16. Phoenix: + 8.43%
17. Los Angeles: + 7.16%
18. Miami/Fort Lauderdale: + 6.11%
Denver:
Denver 2008: $179.718 Billion
Denver 2009: $174.154 Billion
Denver 2010: $180.619 Billion
Denver 2011: $187.732 Billion
Denver 2012: $197.440 Billion
Denver 2013: $209.648 Billion
Overall (2008 - 2013) change: + $29.93 Billion or 16.65% growth
Phoenix:
Phoenix 2008: $193.233 Billion
Phoenix 2009: $179.998 Billion
Phoenix 2010: $183.248 Billion
Phoenix 2011: $192.242 Billion
Phoenix 2012: $203.531 Billion
Phoenix 2013: $209.523 Billion
Overall (2008 - 2013) change: + $16.29 Billion or 8.43% growth
Portland:
Portland 2008: $152.584 Billion
Portland 2009: $155.064 Billion
Portland 2010: $161.633 Billion
Portland 2011: $172.195 Billion
Portland 2012: $181.733 Billion
Portland 2013: $189.268 Billion
Overall (2008 - 2013) change: + $36.684 Billion or 24.04% growth
San Diego:
San Diego 2008: $176.616 Billion
San Diego 2009: $173.564 Billion
San Diego 2010: $175.201 Billion
San Diego 2011: $182.676 Billion
San Diego 2012: $190.940 Billion
San Diego 2013: $197.886 Billion
Overall (2008 - 2013) change: + $21.27 Billion or 12.04% growth
Should be noted though that unlike Portland, Denver, or Phoenix that San Diego is an actual player in an important industry (I would say top 3 in that industry): Bio-tech.
Income growth by county (2004 - 2013):
1. San Diego County, CA: + 4.9% (San Diego)
2. Denver County, CO: + 2.8% (Denver)
3. Multnomah, OR: + 1.9% (Portland)
4. Maricopa, AZ: + 0.4% (Phoenix)
Although I don't know which places would stand to gain the most or possibly lose the most if you factored in the mysterious departures of Los Angeles, San Francisco (Bay Area), and Seattle.