Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which do you prefer
Houston 56 60.87%
San Jose 36 39.13%
Voters: 92. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-01-2016, 04:50 PM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,732,359 times
Reputation: 10592

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by the topper View Post
Just compare Houston's Galleria vs San Jose's Santana Row. which has better ambiance? Santana Row!
Santana Row does have better ambiance, but Houston Galleria has a heck of a lot more shops.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-01-2016, 04:55 PM
 
3,335 posts, read 2,923,136 times
Reputation: 1305
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessemh431 View Post
If SJ's proximity to SF is not a factor, then that means we're choosing if we hypothetically had to live/work/play all in SJ or Houston, correct? Houston definitely isn't the most fun city in the country, but I really can't think of a more boring major city than SJ. If it weren't for the influence of SF being 1 hour north and the connectedness of the Peninsula, SJ really has almost nothing going for it. It's boring and expensive. The tech jobs are not in the city of SJ really. Palo Alto, Mountain View, and a few others in the area are the real Silicon Valley. That's where Google, Facebook, and others are located, not SJ. SJ really has almost nothing fun. For a city of 1 million, there is Santana Row and that's about it. Houston has a real downtown, real nightlife, real cultural activities. SJ has these things, but without SF, there would be nothing going on in SJ.

And regarding SJ being being the secondary major city within a larger metro. Dallas and Fort Worth function together. Each has its own identity, but they're connected in many ways similar to SJ/SF. Without SF, though, SJ is nothing. Without Dallas, Ft Worth can handle its own and has quite a bit going for it still. LA has Long Beach as its secondary city. LBC has tons of culture, vibrancy, nightlife, etc. to function without LA. The argument can be made that LBC would be nothing without LA's importance, but the port of Long Beach is huge and there is actually enough to do in LBC that people don't always have to drive an hour to West LA, WeHo, DTLA, etc. to do stuff. And their job center is actually in the same city, not like Mountain View and Palo Alto BORDERING the city of SJ.

So with that said, I voted Houston, obviously. If this was SJ taking into consideration the culture, nightlife, culture, etc. of SF, I would have voted SJ. Houston can function on its own and attract people for various reasons. SJ would not be able to do so if it weren't for its proximity to SF.
Houston is more boring than San Jose and so flat. It's so sprawled out with a mediocre downtown to speak of despite the new hotel being completed to connect the other side of its convention center and two new parks(discovery and Market Sq.). There are around 11 high rises recently completed and about to be completed in Dt. Houston to no avail. The oil market has crashed, possibly leaving 5 new apt. towers empty for a long time except for first 2 of them(Skyhouse). Downtown SJ is 15 years ahead of Downtown Houston. The only game in town in Houston is Montrose and Westheimer, the Galleria area. In San Jose, Santana Row, downtown, Alameda, Willow Glen and Campbell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2016, 04:56 PM
 
3,335 posts, read 2,923,136 times
Reputation: 1305
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterlemonjello View Post
Santana Row does have better ambiance, but Houston Galleria has a heck of a lot more shops.
Don't forget valley Fair right next to it. It's tie or San Jose just a very little bit more. That's according to Houston Chronicle!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2016, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,514 posts, read 33,519,512 times
Reputation: 12147
Quote:
Originally Posted by the topper View Post
Houston is more boring than San Jose and so flat. It's so sprawled out with a mediocre downtown to speak of despite the new hotel being completed to connect the other side of its convention center and two new parks(discovery and Market Sq.). There are around 11 high rises recently completed and about to be completed in Dt. Houston to no avail. The oil market has crashed, possibly leaving 5 new apt. towers empty for a long time except for first 2 of them(Skyhouse). Downtown SJ is 15 years ahead of Downtown Houston. The only game in town in Houston is Montrose and Westheimer, the Galleria area. In San Jose, Santana Row, downtown, Alameda, Willow Glen and Campbell.
Yeah because only the people who want to live in these apartments are people working in the oil business? Nevermind the large medical center and growing technology centers? You don't know who is moving into these apartments to say this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2016, 05:20 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterlemonjello View Post
I get how much prettier the South Bay is over Houston and right now San Jose gets the nod over Houston in terms of job prospects.

But the food scene in Houston blows San Jose completely out of the water. Now, if you want to include the rest of the Bay Area, thats a different story. But just Houston vs. San Jose, Houston will definately have the better dinning.
Houston DOES NOT have 'better' dining than San Jose. Where did you get that idea from?

The South Bay/ Peninsula has 7 Michelin star rated restaurants, including Manesa, which has 3 stars.

The foodie scene in the South Bay is vibrant and very diverse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2016, 05:23 PM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,338,961 times
Reputation: 6225
Quote:
Originally Posted by the topper View Post
Houston is more boring than San Jose and so flat. It's so sprawled out with a mediocre downtown to speak of despite the new hotel being completed to connect the other side of its convention center and two new parks(discovery and Market Sq.). There are around 11 high rises recently completed and about to be completed in Dt. Houston to no avail. The oil market has crashed, possibly leaving 5 new apt. towers empty for a long time except for first 2 of them(Skyhouse). Downtown SJ is 15 years ahead of Downtown Houston. The only game in town in Houston is Montrose and Westheimer, the Galleria area. In San Jose, Santana Row, downtown, Alameda, Willow Glen and Campbell.
I mean, let's be honest, neither is a real happening place. But Houston is the hub of...Houston haha. SJ is basically just a massive suburb of SF. Neither really has too much going on, but Houston is the actual job center and entertainment/dining/nightlife hub of the metro. Besides Santana Row, most of the stuff going on around SJ happens outside the city. The Peninsula has a lot of the tech jobs and SF has most of the entertainment and culture. That said, the Bay Area has much more to do and much more culture than Houston, but it's just not in SJ.

Houston being flat shouldn't be something that holds it back THAT much. Chicago is flat. Miami is flat. Those are giant deterrents to move to a city. Especially for someone like me that really doesn't care to ever go into nature, access to hills and mountains and hiking is irrelevant. Houston is at least closer to the warm, usable beaches of the Gulf.

One big benefit I can think of with Houston? Neither city is that great to live/work/play in forever. But at least in Houston you'd ave enough money to be able to travel a lot since housing is so much cheaper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2016, 05:28 PM
 
3,335 posts, read 2,923,136 times
Reputation: 1305
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessemh431 View Post
I mean, let's be honest, neither is a real happening place. But Houston is the hub of...Houston haha. SJ is basically just a massive suburb of SF. Neither really has too much going on, but Houston is the actual job center and entertainment/dining/nightlife hub of the metro. Besides Santana Row, most of the stuff going on around SJ happens outside the city. The Peninsula has a lot of the tech jobs and SF has most of the entertainment and culture. That said, the Bay Area has much more to do and much more culture than Houston, but it's just not in SJ.

Houston being flat shouldn't be something that holds it back THAT much. Chicago is flat. Miami is flat. Those are giant deterrents to move to a city. Especially for someone like me that really doesn't care to ever go into nature, access to hills and mountains and hiking is irrelevant. Houston is at least closer to the warm, usable beaches of the Gulf.

One big benefit I can think of with Houston? Neither city is that great to live/work/play in forever. But at least in Houston you'd ave enough money to be able to travel a lot since housing is so much cheaper
Serious?! San Jose is not a suburb. It's a real city with real working neighborhoods/downtown. They both are mediocre cities. It's just that Houston is more mediocre with no real downtown to speak of and no good barbecue pits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2016, 05:30 PM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,338,961 times
Reputation: 6225
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Houston DOES NOT have 'better' dining than San Jose. Where did you get that idea from?

The South Bay/ Peninsula has 7 Michelin star rated restaurants, including Manesa, which has 3 stars.

The foodie scene in the South Bay is vibrant and very diverse.
I thought we're comparing just San Jose to Houston? Peninsula doesn't count here. If the Peninsula were included, I would have voted for San Jose.

South Bay is definitely the only place to get good Mexican food in the Bay though. Never had the Vietnamese food down there, but I'm assuming with the huge Vietnamese population there, it must be great.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2016, 05:32 PM
 
3,335 posts, read 2,923,136 times
Reputation: 1305
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessemh431 View Post
I mean, let's be honest, neither is a real happening place. But Houston is the hub of...Houston haha. SJ is basically just a massive suburb of SF. Neither really has too much going on, but Houston is the actual job center and entertainment/dining/nightlife hub of the metro. Besides Santana Row, most of the stuff going on around SJ happens outside the city. The Peninsula has a lot of the tech jobs and SF has most of the entertainment and culture. That said, the Bay Area has much more to do and much more culture than Houston, but it's just not in SJ.

Houston being flat shouldn't be something that holds it back THAT much. Chicago is flat. Miami is flat. Those are giant deterrents to move to a city. Especially for someone like me that really doesn't care to ever go into nature, access to hills and mountains and hiking is irrelevant. Houston is at least closer to the warm, usable beaches of the Gulf.

One big benefit I can think of with Houston? Neither city is that great to live/work/play in forever. But at least in Houston you'd ave enough money to be able to travel a lot since housing is so much cheaper
It should be a lot cheaper soon that its economy is coming back to earth due to weaker job market in in case for Houston. Low apartment prices are rearing its pretty head again already in the Houston area after a few years of higher rental/housing price, according to apartment.com. You're right: it's a steal in Houston! In San Jose, it will keep going higher, albeit more slowly. San Jose is a rip off!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2016, 05:32 PM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,732,359 times
Reputation: 10592
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Houston DOES NOT have 'better' dining than San Jose. Where did you get that idea from?

The South Bay/ Peninsula has 7 Michelin star rated restaurants, including Manesa, which has 3 stars.

The foodie scene in the South Bay is vibrant and very diverse.
Great. Now tell me how many of those are in San Jose.

Ive eaten extensively in both cities and if we are ONLY comparing SAN JOSE to HOUSTON then Houston does have a better eating scene.

The OP asked to compare only the cities not the metro areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top