Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-22-2016, 06:54 AM
 
370 posts, read 544,300 times
Reputation: 610

Advertisements

Hoping to see Charlotte hit 2.5 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2016, 07:26 AM
 
16,345 posts, read 18,071,077 times
Reputation: 7879
The public release of the estimates won't be until Thursday at 12:01AM Eastern, and media outlets are not allowed to release the information early. So you will have to wait a few more days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 08:01 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,660 posts, read 67,548,962 times
Reputation: 21249
I am most eager to see the Bay Area's CSA growth, the region should be over 8.7 million but we shall see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Florida
2,232 posts, read 2,120,475 times
Reputation: 1910
Houston will most definitely go down in growth. My question is how much.... I predict less than 100,000 growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 08:14 AM
 
6,843 posts, read 10,972,199 times
Reputation: 8436
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
I am most eager to see the Bay Area's CSA growth, the region should be over 8.7 million but we shall see.
Should cross 9 million in a few years (well before the 2020 census).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happiness-is-close View Post
Houston will most definitely go down in growth. My question is how much.... I predict less than 100,000 growth.
I seriously doubt that will happen. Its slowdown will be 20,000-35,000 max (from 156,000 to something like 135,000 or 120,000).

Houston grows by 100,000 alone off births minus deaths and immigration (constants regardless of economy - since the bulk of its immigration is refugee resettlement from Central America, Middle-East, and Southeast Asia).

Last edited by Trafalgar Law; 03-22-2016 at 08:43 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 10:28 AM
 
12,735 posts, read 21,786,979 times
Reputation: 3774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happiness-is-close View Post
Houston will most definitely go down in growth. My question is how much.... I predict less than 100,000 growth.
Keep on wishing, buddy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 10:29 AM
 
12,735 posts, read 21,786,979 times
Reputation: 3774
This oil downturn is brainwashing so many people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 10:39 AM
 
93,412 posts, read 124,052,832 times
Reputation: 18273
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
I'm interested in Monroe County, NY (Rochester) and Erie County, NY (Buffalo) because according to census estimates both have turned the corner (0-1% growth) and are growing again, but just barely so I'm interested to see if its a trend.
Monroe County has only had one census where it showed a population loss(1980). So, I don't know where you thought it lost people. Adjacent Ontario County is one of the fastest growing counties in NY State too. Saratoga County(Saratoga Springs/Albany metro), I believe is the fastest growing county in NYS.

Erie County is a different story, but is showing slight population growth. Onondaga County(Syracuse) has had slight, but steady growth for several years now and will be interesting to see if that continues. Albany, Schenectady and Rensselaer(Troy) counties likely have steady growth and has so for some years as well. Tompkins(Ithaca), Jefferson(Watertown), Warren(Glens Falls) and Clinton(Plattsburgh) are other Upstate NY counties that also come to mind in terms of population growth, among maybe some others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 12:14 PM
 
6,843 posts, read 10,972,199 times
Reputation: 8436
Curious to see how the Big 3 play out for 2015;

New York MSA:
2010-2011: + 188,718
2011-2012: + 118,478
2012-2013: + 127,480
2013-2014: + 90,797
2014-2015: ????

Los Angeles MSA:
2010-2011: + 125,688
2011-2012: + 110,236
2012-2013: + 111,088
2013-2014: + 86,371
2014-2015: ????

Chicago MSA:
2010-2011: + 32,359
2011-2012: + 25,852
2012-2013: + 25,480
2013-2014: + 9,802
2014-2015: ????

2010-2011 is a 15 month cycle rather than a 12 month one (April 2010 - July 2011). My expectation is for all 3 places to post gains in 2015 but curious to see if deceleration continues to occur or if they actually accelerate. All of the Northeast Corridor cities have decelerated each year since 2010, with Boston doing so the least. The region and state numbers for 2015, released in December, showed the Northeastern United States cooling down by a whopping 40,000 people compared to how much it gained in the same time frame in 2014. So I don't expect anywhere in the Northeast Corridor to post any accelerations at all but am curious to see how far and how deep the deceleration is for everywhere.

If I didn't understand what was going on, I would've found the deceleration concerning but the reality is that the United States is now gearing back to pre-recession trends. The same states that were seeing a superboom prior to the recession (NV, FL, AZ - the leaders of the pack) are doing it again now.

Last edited by Trafalgar Law; 03-22-2016 at 12:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 03:07 PM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,140,627 times
Reputation: 6338
Why did NYC grow 188k through in the heart of the recession and slow down as the national economy got better? Because people couldn't leave the metro when they wanted to? You'd think as the national economy got better overall, those metros would have accelerating growth.

I guess because of a bad economy, people had to stay put so high incoming net immigration + low outgoing migration + high birth/death ratios give you high growth in the large metros. When the economy gets better, the formula turns to high incoming net immigration + high outgoing migration + lowering birth/death ratios = slowing growth in the large metros.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top